Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
12 minutes ago, PromoTheRobot said:

NFL.com has the Bills at 12, ESPN at 15. New York Post moves us up one, all the way to 18 from 19. The next lowest 2-0 team is #8. :lol: Bitter much?

 

https://nypost.com/2019/09/17/nfl-power-rankings-for-week-2-surprise-49ers-are-surging/

 

I think the bitterness is directed at the Jets and Giants. Their fans currently think a strong high school team could beat them. 

Posted
12 minutes ago, dollars 2 donuts said:

 

The post has the Browns more than a quarter of the entire league in front of us.

 

San Fran, the only other team to be 2-0 after 2 road games, and against middling opposition, and after finishing 4-12 last year, is #8.

It's all about that guy dating the porn star.    SF is the chic pic I guess

  • Awesome! (+1) 1
Posted
Quote

 

 

If Buffalo goes to 3-0, it's possible that their 3 opponents will be the 3 lowest ranked teams in the NFL. Miami is no longer in the NFL.

  • Like (+1) 1
  • Awesome! (+1) 1
  • Thank you (+1) 1
Posted

Here is a different type of power rankings.  Based on a formula, targeted at gamblers.  It does not take into accounts things like the injury to Drew Brees and the retirment of Andrew Luck. Not a better method, not a worse method.  Just a different method.  It has the Bills currently  at 15th.  

https://www.oddsshark.com/nfl/power-rankings

oddsharks definitely like the Bills over the Bengals

 

image.thumb.png.7d466aec5f43f137efc6e2f5c8ebf80b.png

  • Thank you (+1) 1
Posted

 

I think #12 is a fair ranking at this time.  Yes, the Bills are 2-0 and did that on the road but both of their opponents look to be serious bottom-feeders.  Until they prove they can beat teams about equal to them or better, they won't get the "respect" that Bills fans think they deserve now.   A win, even a lopsided one, next week over Cinci probably won't propel the Bills more than 1 or 2 places higher.  If they can go toe-to-toe with the Pats in Week 4, then they'll start being considered a serious playoff contender.

  • Like (+1) 1
Posted
2 minutes ago, SoTier said:

 

I think #12 is a fair ranking at this time.  Yes, the Bills are 2-0 and did that on the road but both of their opponents look to be serious bottom-feeders.  Until they prove they can beat teams about equal to them or better, they won't get the "respect" that Bills fans think they deserve now.   A win, even a lopsided one, next week over Cinci probably won't propel the Bills more than 1 or 2 places higher.  If they can go toe-to-toe with the Pats in Week 4, then they'll start being considered a serious playoff contender.

Looking like bottom feeders and being bottom feeders .. not the same.

 

the media has always ranked Darnold over Allen.   The Giants put up points against Dallas.   ergo .....  

 

see the point?    (no, because there isn't one) 

Posted

The heavy numbers are lazy and counter to the intent of a "power ranking".  If you want to see rankings based on record just go to nfl.com standings.  

 

Looking at last year's results, combined with the bottom feeder perception of the teams we beat, I would put us in the mid teens at this point.  While we as the fans saw a game where the Bills clearly outplayed the Jets for 4 quarters as a team, it doesn't matter.  The result is that we beat the giants and almost lost to the Jets.  If we embarrass the Bengals we could go up a few spots.  Playing the Pats tough, even if we lose, will have the greatest impact on where perception falls.

 

Personally, I feel the Bills can be a top 10 team this year.  But we (and the media) won't know until we play another top 10 team and are competitive.

Posted
5 minutes ago, Rew said:

The heavy numbers are lazy and counter to the intent of a "power ranking".  If you want to see rankings based on record just go to nfl.com standings.  

 

Looking at last year's results, combined with the bottom feeder perception of the teams we beat, I would put us in the mid teens at this point.  While we as the fans saw a game where the Bills clearly outplayed the Jets for 4 quarters as a team, it doesn't matter.  The result is that we beat the giants and almost lost to the Jets.  If we embarrass the Bengals we could go up a few spots.  Playing the Pats tough, even if we lose, will have the greatest impact on where perception falls.

 

Personally, I feel the Bills can be a top 10 team this year.  But we (and the media) won't know until we play another top 10 team and are competitive.

 

they are # 9 ...   

 

heavy actually did that 

Posted

Among national media outlets, ESPN almost always has Buffalo ranked lower than anybody else.  Right now, they have Buffalo at #15.  This time, they're the same as Bleacher Report.  Among regional media outlets, the Mile High Report has Buffalo at #24 - two spots higher than the 0 - 2 Denver Broncos.  Surprise, surprise.

Posted
5 minutes ago, TigerJ said:

Among national media outlets, ESPN almost always has Buffalo ranked lower than anybody else.  Right now, they have Buffalo at #15.  This time, they're the same as Bleacher Report.  Among regional media outlets, the Mile High Report has Buffalo at #24 - two spots higher than the 0 - 2 Denver Broncos.  Surprise, surprise.

where?? 

 

I see last weeks #'s on their ranking  page 

 

Posted
15 minutes ago, TigerJ said:

Among national media outlets, ESPN almost always has Buffalo ranked lower than anybody else.  Right now, they have Buffalo at #15.  This time, they're the same as Bleacher Report.  Among regional media outlets, the Mile High Report has Buffalo at #24 - two spots higher than the 0 - 2 Denver Broncos.  Surprise, surprise.

Are they actually hating.... or did they just eat the wrong gummy bears?

Posted
1 hour ago, SlimShady'sGhost said:

Looking like bottom feeders and being bottom feeders .. not the same.

 

the media has always ranked Darnold over Allen.   The Giants put up points against Dallas.   ergo .....  

 

see the point?    (no, because there isn't one) 

 

As I've said before, some teams that laid eggs in Week 1 will go on to become playoff teams while some other teams that performed well in Week 1 will wind up in the toilet.  Week 2 only gives us a hint of what the teams really are.

  • Like (+1) 1
Posted
2 hours ago, PlayoffsPlease said:

Here is a different type of power rankings.  Based on a formula, targeted at gamblers.  It does not take into accounts things like the injury to Drew Brees and the retirment of Andrew Luck. Not a better method, not a worse method.  Just a different method.  It has the Bills currently  at 15th.  

https://www.oddsshark.com/nfl/power-rankings

oddsharks definitely like the Bills over the Bengals

 

image.thumb.png.7d466aec5f43f137efc6e2f5c8ebf80b.png

Indy at #4.... Woah

13 minutes ago, SlimShady'sGhost said:

who knows, could be 

Bills > Chargers

Without Gordon, yes.

 

Rivers is pretty much done

Posted (edited)

https://www.yahoo.com/sports/nfl-power-rankings-poll-week-140559473.html

 

13. BUFFALO BILLS (2-0)

Previous rank: 20
Points in poll: 217 

Highest-place vote: 7 (1 voter) Lowest-place vote: 18 (1 voter) 

Last week’s result: Beat N.Y. Giants, 28-14 

This week: vs. Cincinnati

Josh Allen is winning games—and showing some swag.

 

Our voters took note, and the Bills are in the top half of the poll for the first time in a long time.

Edited by SlimShady'sGhost
  • Like (+1) 1
×
×
  • Create New...