Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
6 minutes ago, Joe in Winslow said:

 

So this is the hill you want to die on? That Tyreek Hill isn't a shitlord?
 

 

I'm speaking specifically to the accusation of child abuse. It's baseless as was made clear with the suspension happy NFL doing nothing to him. 

1 hour ago, 4merper4mer said:

That's not what they determined.  They determined they couldn't prove anything and they don't want to risk being sued.  None of this compels the Chiefs to extend this cretin but here we are.

 

Ummmm did you see what happened with Zeke? What did the NFL prove in that specific case?!?!

Posted
6 minutes ago, StHustle said:

 

I'm speaking specifically to the accusation of child abuse. It's baseless as was made clear with the suspension happy NFL doing nothing to him. 

 

 

 

You can't be serious.

 

Posted
2 hours ago, StHustle said:

You guys know the NFL is QUICK to suspend a player if they find a shred of credible evidence. Law enforcement and the league determined the allegations were false...what makes you think you know better than them? I'm sure you think Shady got his ex robbed as well.

 

They didn't quite determine that. They determined the evidence was insufficient to proceed. They did not determine the allegations were false. 

1 hour ago, 4merper4mer said:

That's not what they determined.  They determined they couldn't prove anything and they don't want to risk being sued.  None of this compels the Chiefs to extend this cretin but here we are.

 

Correct. 

  • Like (+1) 1
Posted
25 minutes ago, StHustle said:

 

I'm speaking specifically to the accusation of child abuse. It's baseless as was made clear with the suspension happy NFL doing nothing to him. 

 

 

The initial basis was a kid with a broken friggin arm and a recording of this reprobate making threats.  Nothing was proven.  Whoop de friggin do.  The Chiefs still decided to throw millions at this loooooooooooser.

Posted
19 hours ago, H2o said:

:lol: I'll take that bet as long as there are outs for injury. 

And thats part of it, little guys rarely last.

Posted
18 hours ago, GunnerBill said:

 

So Hill does catch bubble screens and a the little shovel passes (far from all he catches of course) but newsflash - that is modern NFL offense. The Bills just kept a guy for exactly that purpose over a big guy who high points the ball. So is Hill a bit "unconventional" as a #1 receiver? Yep. But calling it gadget bull**** completely misses the direction NFL offenses are going in. A guy who can do gadget stuff isnt a drawback.... it is an asset! 

A few tears ago nobody could stop the Wildcat, it didn't last and neither will the stuff behind the LOS, NFL athletes are too fast and physical for it to work as a major part of the game.  Theres a reason end arounds, flee flickers, hell even conventional screen plays aren't used much, they require a failure on the D and perfect execution and a playmaker all coming together for it to work.  It's all well and good, but Andy Reid always starts off hot and his team ***** the bed around mid season and can't finish because trick bull ***** only works so long before teams expect the "unexpected".

 

19 hours ago, jeremy2020 said:

 

So there's like 2 #1 receivers in the league?

No, there are plenty of guys that run routes and catch the ball down field, outside of fly routes.

 

18 hours ago, klos63 said:

what type of gadget plays? just because he runs circles around defenders doesn't mean it's a gadget play. This is really a ridiculous comment.

He gets a lot of short pass, behind LOS, bubble screen stuff, he makes plays, as I said.  He can be shut down and my bet is he will be this year.  The good thing he has going is a lot of other threats around which makes it harder to focus on him.

Posted (edited)
22 hours ago, aristocrat said:

https://twitter.com/AdamSchefter/status/1170002787700289536?s=20

Tyreek Hill signed a three-year $54 million extension with the Chiefs, as

reported.

 

That's what Andy Reid calls "the Process".

 

22 hours ago, mannc said:

Or maybe, like the NFL, they don’t think he did it.

 

That's incorrect.

 

The information developed in the court proceeding is confidential and has not been shared with us, and the court has sealed all law enforcement records. Local law enforcement authorities have publicly advised that the available evidence does not permit them to determine who caused the child's injuries.

 

"Similarly, based on the evidence presently available, the NFL cannot conclude that Mr. Hill violated the Personal Conduct Policy."

 

Based on the little evidence they had, they concluded they don't know what happened. 

Edited by Mr. WEO
Posted
1 hour ago, DCofNC said:

And thats part of it, little guys rarely last.

If he gets in 12 games he'll easily be over 1000 yards

Posted
20 hours ago, Rob's House said:

The son would be much better off if his dad's earning potential was significantly diminished.

 

If the kid is being paid per beating, you may have a point.

  • Haha (+1) 1
×
×
  • Create New...