1billsfan Posted April 6, 2005 Posted April 6, 2005 They called Donahoe a tard. We'll see you losers... http://www.azcardinals.com/cgi-bin/ultimat...ic;f=2;t=021426
Talonz Posted April 6, 2005 Posted April 6, 2005 They called Donahoe a tard. We'll see you losers... http://www.azcardinals.com/cgi-bin/ultimat...ic;f=2;t=021426 297495[/snapback] This is a classic quote from "BIRDBOY" ...( YIKES ) -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- the cards don't need henry, they could draft a back. the bills need an O-linemen, and need to unload henry. THE BILLS ARE GAY, THATS ALL I HAVE TO SAY
gantrules Posted April 6, 2005 Posted April 6, 2005 The Bills are gay that's all I have to say? 'Nuff said.
bobblehead Posted April 6, 2005 Posted April 6, 2005 The Bills are gay that's all I have to say? 'Nuff said. 297644[/snapback] Does anyone know what a petafile is?
John from Riverside Posted April 6, 2005 Posted April 6, 2005 I was going to register and spend some time chatting with them....but I am not sure if it is worth the effort
R. Rich Posted April 6, 2005 Posted April 6, 2005 THE BILLS ARE GAY, THATS ALL I HAVE TO SAY 297641[/snapback] Where's Andy Milonakis when you need him?
OGTEleven Posted April 6, 2005 Posted April 6, 2005 They are pretty much correct about Henry and his (lack of) value to us. They are also correct about the depth of RB in the draft. Where they're wrong is Shelton. Do they think TD is going to believe they'l keep an already replaced LT with a $3M salary cap hit as a backup? They'll cut him and TD knows that. We, otoh, can afford to keep Henry because his salary is so low and he (to at least some degree) will have to play nice-nice to have a chance at a contract the following year.
Live&DieBillsFootball Posted April 6, 2005 Posted April 6, 2005 That's some funny stuff. I never knew the Cards had any fans and now I know that they do but all of them are 12 years old. I like the TD is gay because he won't make the trade comments. I really think that the Cards need TH more than we need Shelton. Shelton is expendable and getting TH allows them to draft for other needs with their top 2 picks. The Bills would like to get some value for TH, but if we can't we can keep him as a backup for another year. Draft a center in the 2nd and move Teague to LT.
R. Rich Posted April 6, 2005 Posted April 6, 2005 Uh oh. It's getting nasty. 297721[/snapback] Scary, huh?
ganesh Posted April 6, 2005 Posted April 6, 2005 They are pretty much correct about Henry and his (lack of) value to us. They are also correct about the depth of RB in the draft. Where they're wrong is Shelton. Do they think TD is going to believe they'l keep an already replaced LT with a $3M salary cap hit as a backup? They'll cut him and TD knows that. We, otoh, can afford to keep Henry because his salary is so low and he (to at least some degree) will have to play nice-nice to have a chance at a contract the following year. 297687[/snapback] Also, the statement about us needing Shelton is incorrect. We really don't need to have Shelton. We could either draft a Tackle in the 2nd round or draft a Center and move Teague to Tackle. Personally I don't think Shelton has done much in the NFL to say that he is much better than Teague.
Dan Gross Posted April 6, 2005 Posted April 6, 2005 Uh oh. It's getting nasty. 297721[/snapback] Man, that Cigar M, while a Bills fan, is a trouble-maker. He'd be banned in 30 seconds on this board...
IDBillzFan Posted April 6, 2005 Posted April 6, 2005 Also, the statement about us needing Shelton is incorrect. We really don't need to have Shelton. We could either draft a Tackle in the 2nd round or draft a Center and move Teague to Tackle. 297729[/snapback] See, my thinking was somewhat along these lines. They come across as saying we need Shelton more than they need Henry because they can get a RB in the draft. The problem is, they need more than just Henry. They have a defense to worry about. We don't. In fact, many here believe that if and when we get Shelton, we're set and can now focus not on filling desperate needs so much as developing depth. That, to me, is why we hold the upper hand. We have fewer overall needs this offseason than the Cards.
Rayzer32 Posted April 6, 2005 Posted April 6, 2005 Aparrently the word "Gay" is big in AZ, just like "Wicked" is in Boston. Cardinals fans are........GAY!!!
Ramius Posted April 6, 2005 Posted April 6, 2005 apparently, spelling is left out of the circulum in Arizona schools...
mead107 Posted April 6, 2005 Posted April 6, 2005 gay ??? what 's that mean ???? another word for happy ???
Rayzer32 Posted April 6, 2005 Posted April 6, 2005 gay ??? what 's that mean ???? another word for happy ??? 297809[/snapback] I was referring to a "pile of sticks". Oh wait, that's the word faggott. I bet they would use that term instead if they knew how to spell it.
Dr. Fong Posted April 6, 2005 Posted April 6, 2005 A lot of people make a big deal about how deep the draft is at RB. Well here's food for thought on that. The Cards COULD probably get one of those RBs in the draft, however, it will cost them a pick. So they will end up with one of the big 3 RBs and nothing else. OR they can make this trade and get someone like a Pac Man Jones AND Travis Henry. So now tell me how deep the draft is at RB. It doesn't matter when you can improve your team by adding a proven player at a need position and drafting a high draft pick to fill another position of need. Home run for the Cards as far as I'm concerned.
ndmanley Posted April 6, 2005 Posted April 6, 2005 Where's Andy Milonakis when you need him? 297677[/snapback] Nice reference. He is long gone. He was funny for a while but JK is way better with him gone.
Recommended Posts