Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

OK, I did this last year and am going to do it again this year.  For those not participating in TBD survivor leagues, who are you taking in week 1?

Posted (edited)

I'm riding Miami all year unless they play the Raiders. Then I'll consider it.

 

Edit: Meaning I'm taking the Ravens this week.

Edited by LBSeeBallLBGetBall
  • Like (+1) 1
Posted

I have a bunch of entries.  I took Baltimore, Seattle and Philly.  I figure Seattle is a mortal lock but want to save them for later.

Posted (edited)
20 minutes ago, LBSeeBallLBGetBall said:

I'm riding Miami all year unless they play the Raiders. Then I'll consider it.

 

Edit: Meaning I'm taking the Ravens this week.

 

I thought about the Ravens, but I don't trust Lamar Jackson and their offense.  But otherwise, anyone playing Miami and Arizona should be a good bet (though I don't trust Detroit, either).  Redskins are going to suck this year, too; pretty much any team playing them has a good shot at a win.

Edited by Happy Gilmore
Posted
18 minutes ago, Kirby Jackson said:

Seattle

 

Same. You're doomed. I've gotten bounced opening week the past two seasons. And I wasn't trying to save a team either year (Pats then Saints).

Posted
21 minutes ago, Jasovon said:

my strategy this year is just whoever is playing the dolphins

Absolutely. They are survivor gold this year.

Posted
20 minutes ago, qwksilver said:

Seahawks. For those taking Ravens, beware of Fitz's hot starts and it's in Miami (92 with 95% humidity).

 

My son warned me of Fitz starting hot.  But he's got little to work with in Miami.

Posted
16 minutes ago, Happy Gilmore said:

 

I thought about the Ravens, but I don't trust Lamar Jackson and their offense.  But otherwise, anyone playing Miami and Arizona should be a good bet (though I don't trust Detroit, either).  Redskins are going to suck this year, too; pretty much any team playing them has a good shot at a win.

Stafford might not be great, but he's too good to lose every game like the other two.

Posted
1 minute ago, Doc said:

 

My son warned me of Fitz starting hot.  But he's got little to work with in Miami.

Correct. They are going to struggle to win 4 games. 

Also, not a huge fan of Jackson so that would be strike 2 against the Ravens.

 

Although as bad as Fish are I wouldn't be surprised with a 27-6 loss. I just think Seattle is safer for week 1.

Posted

I wouldn't Arizona until I've seen Murray play.  I think he'll struggle but I don't want to find out the hard way if he doesn't.

Just now, qwksilver said:

Correct. They are going to struggle to win 4 games. 

Also, not a huge fan of Jackson so that would be strike 2 against the Ravens.

 

Although as bad as Fish are I wouldn't be surprised with a 27-6 loss. I just think Seattle is safer for week 1.

 

The Ravens' defense and running game will carry that team to a win.

Posted
1 minute ago, LBSeeBallLBGetBall said:

Stafford might not be great, but he's too good to lose every game like the other two.

 

I meant this week vs Arizona.  I agree with you that Detroit won't be that bad this year; Stafford is too up and down to go for/against Detroit on a weekly basis.

  • Like (+1) 1
Posted
1 minute ago, Doc said:

The Ravens' defense and running game will carry that team to a win.

No argument here. I just think there's a slight chance Fitzy could go off. SLIGHT.

Posted
2 minutes ago, qwksilver said:

No argument here. I just think there's a slight chance Fitzy could go off. SLIGHT.

 

There's always a chance.  I just don't see the OL and skill positions being nearly as good as those he's played with in the past.

  • Like (+1) 1
×
×
  • Create New...