TakeYouToTasker Posted May 11, 2020 Posted May 11, 2020 (edited) 15 minutes ago, Cinga said: You realize what you're quoting is an early re-interpretation of history by progressive theory don't you? Damn the rich and all the raysis founders sort of thing? What‘s revisionist would be naming Beard an espouser of Critical Theory. It‘s also pure and raw fallacy to place your trust in the hands of court historians, writing “history” in order to deify the leaders of the state. I choose not to allow my mind to be ghettoized. I accept that men whose final arguments I disagree with can be right about a good many things along the way, even if their ultimate conclusions are wrong. Beard’s analysis of the Constitution is one such example of this. Marx’s primary identification of what capital is, is another. Edited May 11, 2020 by TakeYouToTasker
Cinga Posted May 11, 2020 Posted May 11, 2020 22 minutes ago, TakeYouToTasker said: What‘s revisionist would be naming Beard an espouser of Critical Theory. It‘s also pure and raw fallacy to place your trust in the hands of court historians, writing “history” in order to deify the leaders of the state. I choose not to allow my mind to be ghettoized. I accept that men whose final arguments I disagree with can be right about a good many things along the way, even if their ultimate conclusions are wrong. Beard’s analysis of the Constitution is one such example of this. Marx’s primary identification of what capital is, is another. Interesting... I always thought of you as an independent thinker, someone who read history and made up your own mind.
TakeYouToTasker Posted May 11, 2020 Posted May 11, 2020 28 minutes ago, Cinga said: Interesting... I always thought of you as an independent thinker, someone who read history and made up your own mind. You just paraphrased exactly what I just said above. I read history, and make up my own mind. IE I’m able to discern which arguments are compelling and meritorious, and which are not; and am able to do so without buttressing my desire to understand upon poisoning the well fallacies, amongst others.
daz28 Posted May 11, 2020 Posted May 11, 2020 7 hours ago, Rob's House said: From the first of your posts that I quoted: "... so don't forget that the if the progressives do take power, you'll know exactly how the other half felt when they were left out." So this is what you want to take in front of the jury of your peers to show that I'm the one who injected partisanship in this discussion, and in this thread??? I think I pretty much took a poop all over the entire government, and the statesmen that inhabit it. I have no dog in the fight but me, you, and every other American. Our government belongs to us no matter what ANYONE says. 7 hours ago, TakeYouToTasker said: Why do you believe that the government is legitimate, or that it represents or serves the people? Only approximately 50% of the eligible voting population casts a ballot, and the eligible population is only roughly 50%, at most, of the total population. This means that one quarter of the population is voting, with the vote being split roughly equally between the two major parties. The results of this are that approximately 1/8 of the population presumes to dictate to 7/8 of the population. Democracy is nothing more than a clever ploy by the power elite to compel their chattel to craft their own shackles, and to cheer while doing so. They haven't pried the right to vote out anyone's cold dead hand either. Did I say I believe the govt is legit or serves us?? I think I said the opposite
Pine Barrens Mafia Posted May 11, 2020 Posted May 11, 2020 9 hours ago, TakeYouToTasker said: The Revolution has somewhere around 30-35% popular support. The Founders served to benefit the most first from waging the war, which granted to themselves the powers formerly vested with the British Crown. By waging the war they afforded themselves immense power. They then tore down a government which served the people and the States in order to implement one which primarily served themselves to the detriment of the people. Charles Beard has done some excellent work on the subject. https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/An_Economic_Interpretation_of_the_Constitution_of_the_United_States
Foxx Posted May 11, 2020 Posted May 11, 2020 7 hours ago, daz28 said: ... They haven't pried the right to vote out anyone's cold dead hand either. Did I say I believe the govt is legit or serves us?? I think I said the opposite if voting changed anything, it would be illegal. 1
Motorin' Posted May 11, 2020 Posted May 11, 2020 On 5/10/2020 at 11:25 AM, Chef Jim said: You blame the system. I blame the people who created and run the system. You can’t blame something that was created you blame the creators. Back to the drug analogy. If there were no drug addicts there’d be no drug dealers. There'd be no drug dealers if drugs didn't have addictive properties.
Chef Jim Posted May 11, 2020 Posted May 11, 2020 18 minutes ago, Motorin' said: There'd be no drug dealers if drugs didn't have addictive properties. So you blame and inanimate object? There would be no need for drug dealers if people with addictive personalities learned how to overcome them their cravings.
Motorin' Posted May 11, 2020 Posted May 11, 2020 3 minutes ago, Chef Jim said: So you blame and inanimate object? There would be no need for drug dealers if people with addictive personalities learned how to overcome them their cravings. The effects of drugs are biological and psychological, thus the effects are not inanimate. Addiction is also a disease, which explains why some people just can't overcome their cravings. Blaming addicts for the actions of drug dealers who capitalize on their illness is off base, in my opinion.
Chef Jim Posted May 11, 2020 Posted May 11, 2020 11 minutes ago, Motorin' said: The effects of drugs are biological and psychological, thus the effects are not inanimate. Addiction is also a disease, which explains why some people just can't overcome their cravings. Blaming addicts for the actions of drug dealers who capitalize on their illness is off base, in my opinion. Take control of your addiction. It’s a curable disease.
Motorin' Posted May 11, 2020 Posted May 11, 2020 1 minute ago, Chef Jim said: Take control of your addiction. It’s a curable disease. For many people who actually suffer from the disease of addiction, the idea that it is curable can be deadly. Way too many examples to count of people who went years and years sober, thought they were "cured" which meant they could have just one beer. Relapse can and does lead to death... It's better for sober addicts to fear the disease and know they are never "cured."
Chef Jim Posted May 11, 2020 Posted May 11, 2020 3 minutes ago, Motorin' said: For many people who actually suffer from the disease of addiction, the idea that it is curable can be deadly. Way too many examples to count of people who went years and years sober, thought they were "cured" which meant they could have just one beer. Relapse can and does lead to death... It's better for sober addicts to fear the disease and know they are never "cured." I know all this first hand. The addict holds the cure. But I’m looking at this fine the demand side of supply and demand.
Albwan Posted May 11, 2020 Posted May 11, 2020 Eating their own: Ellen DeGeneres isn’t as nice as she wants you to believe, insiders confess https://nypost.com/2020/05/09/ellen-degeneres-isnt-as-nice-as-she-wants-you-to-believe/ All this because Ellen sat and joked with Bush at a ball game. lol. I remember that pic thinking, they are going to turn on her. voila. Ellen, we will take you in on the rational right, jump in for the big win. 2
Tiberius Posted May 11, 2020 Posted May 11, 2020 10 minutes ago, Albwan said: Eating their own: Ellen DeGeneres isn’t as nice as she wants you to believe, insiders confess https://nypost.com/2020/05/09/ellen-degeneres-isnt-as-nice-as-she-wants-you-to-believe/ All this because Ellen sat and joked with Bush at a ball game. lol. I remember that pic thinking, they are going to turn on her. voila. Ellen, we will take you in on the rational right, jump in for the big win. Well, she is deep state you know? The Trump gang even said so, lol. Loons
Albwan Posted May 11, 2020 Posted May 11, 2020 20 minutes ago, Buffalo_Gal said: Ya know what it takes to ask the govt for money for fail run states? 2
Recommended Posts