Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

 

 

They're nuts.......

 

Oh Xusana! Racist property redistribution hits Vermont

by John Klar

 

Original Article

 

Last year, Xusana Davis was appointed by Vermont governor Phil Scott as the state’s “first Racial Equity Executive Director.”

 

Davis, formerly of New York City’s Department of Mental Health and Hygiene, applied for the job “on a whim,” and was installed to “identify and address systemic racism in Vermont.”

 

But the law labeling Vermont as systemically racist was also a whim, backed by no evidence aside from bald assertions that racial disparities in prison, land ownership, or school disciplinary actions reflect a disparity in treatment of people of color.

 

The dangers of this false assumption are demonstrated in Xusana’s latest gambit: to “codify community engagement”

 

 

.

Posted
2 hours ago, B-Man said:

 

 

 

ERUkln-W4AAQmty?format=jpg&name=medium

 

 

ERUkoRTWAAAAxEw?format=png&name=360x360

 

 

 

.

 

Please, oh please keep thinking this libs.

 

Why do you want them to keep going after the way of the dodo?

 

If they succeed in continuing on this path, 2 of the very likely outcomes of that are both bad:

 

1.  Somehow the loons like AOC actually get power; or

 

2.  Conservative POLITICIANS get the sort of majority that allows them to become serious grifters (assuming for the moment that they currently aren't) which isn't good for anybody but THEIR cronies.

 

Would suppose there's also the possibility that a 3rd party fills the void where slightly left of center politicians had been, but until that happens we get 1 or 2.

Posted
50 minutes ago, Deranged Rhino said:

 

 

Wait what? Straight black men are the white men of the black community?

  • Like (+1) 1
Posted
Just now, Koko78 said:

 

Wait what? Straight black men are the white men of the black community?

 

Yes, because they're more conservative when it comes to LBGTQ issues (as are Latinos). 

(according to that community of course)

Posted (edited)

 

 

The evidence doesn’t back Democrats’ panic that Bernie can’t win.

 

 

I don’t think Sanders will win but also won’t discount the possibility.

 

The scariest part of a Sanders Administration — and apparently he and his team are already preparing for this — would be a raft of executive orders which would be happily put into action by the Democrats and progressives who dominate the all-too-powerful executive branch.

 

 

 

 

 

 

ELECTING SANDERS MEANS MORE, NOT LESS CORRUPTION:

More regulation creates more opportunities for political corruption, Issues & Insights notes this morning, and it follows as logically as night follows day that electing Bernie Sanders will result in more of the very things he promises to get rid of in government. There’s even objective evidence of this process at work around the world.

 

 

 

 

.

 

 
 
 
 
.
Edited by B-Man
  • Thank you (+1) 1
Posted (edited)

 

 

Why didn't Katie Hill defy Pelosi and stay in the House?

 

Was it to avoid an ethics investigation revealing she treated her own staff like a buffet?

 

.

 

Katie Hill sexually exploited multiple subordinates and used political and government dollars to pay them.

 

She resigned because the House Ethics Committee figured it out and she was worried about facing legal consequences.

 

This rehab tour is wrong.

 

 

.

Edited by B-Man
  • Like (+1) 4
  • Haha (+1) 1
Posted
1 hour ago, B-Man said:

Katie Hill sexually exploited multiple subordinates and used political and government dollars to pay them.

 

Man, why can't I get one of these jobs?

  • Like (+1) 1
  • Haha (+1) 2
Posted
21 minutes ago, 3rdnlng said:

You have to have a dick, not be one. :devil:

 

Not according to Katie Hill! She takes on all comers.

  • Haha (+1) 1
×
×
  • Create New...