njbuff Posted November 9, 2019 Posted November 9, 2019 25 minutes ago, Deranged Rhino said: Something needs to be done about this. There is NO WAY in the REAL WORLD that a biological male should ever be near a woman's sporting event. If I had daughters, this would outrage the hell out of me. Heck,, I don't even have daughters and it sickens me. 2 1
Boatdrinks Posted November 9, 2019 Posted November 9, 2019 24 minutes ago, njbuff said: Something needs to be done about this. There is NO WAY in the REAL WORLD that a biological male should ever be near a woman's sporting event. If I had daughters, this would outrage the hell out of me. Heck,, I don't even have daughters and it sickens me. Seriously. This stuff is some of the most illogical, idiotic type of thinking I’ve ever seen. You’re either male or female. If it’s ambiguous at birth , then it will be treated. Identifying is just a euphemism for “ pretending to be”. How is a male pretending to be female allowed in a women s sporting competition. This stuff is not normal, and any hope the Dems had is likely to be flushed along with this ( and other) agenda. So in the end, that’s a good thing but what a joke they’ve become.
njbuff Posted November 9, 2019 Posted November 9, 2019 2 minutes ago, Boatdrinks said: Seriously. This stuff is some of the most illogical, idiotic type of thinking I’ve ever seen. You’re either male or female. If it’s ambiguous at birth , then it will be treated. Identifying is just a euphemism for “ pretending to be”. How is a male pretending to be female allowed in a women s sporting competition. This stuff is not normal, and any hope the Dems had is likely to be flushed along with this ( and other) agenda. So in the end, that’s a good thing but what a joke they’ve become. How is any of this even a debate? I guess you throw all common sense out the window.
Boatdrinks Posted November 9, 2019 Posted November 9, 2019 Just now, njbuff said: How is any of this even a debate? I guess you throw all common sense out the window. That’s about it. Amazing it would even have to be argued. Libs / progs/ Dems have absolutely lost their minds.
njbuff Posted November 9, 2019 Posted November 9, 2019 1 minute ago, Boatdrinks said: That’s about it. Amazing it would even have to be argued. Libs / progs/ Dems have absolutely lost their minds. I guess these Dems must have loved the movie "Ladybugs" and continuously wanna relive that move.
Chef Jim Posted November 9, 2019 Posted November 9, 2019 (edited) 1 hour ago, Deranged Rhino said: Can someone explain to me why this is ok and being allowed to happen? Anyone here on the left support this and if so why? Edited November 9, 2019 by Chef Jim
Buffalo_Gal Posted November 9, 2019 Posted November 9, 2019 50 minutes ago, njbuff said: Something needs to be done about this. There is NO WAY in the REAL WORLD that a biological male should ever be near a woman's sporting event. If I had daughters, this would outrage the hell out of me. Heck,, I don't even have daughters and it sickens me. While not all men are larger than all women, as a sex most men are bigger and stronger than most women. Add in high testosterone levels and the 20-40 years when men are at their physical peak ... this is a recipe for disaster. Title 9 came about for a number of reasons. "Feminists" today are a shameful breed to allow this to continue without a peep.
3rdnlng Posted November 9, 2019 Posted November 9, 2019 58 minutes ago, Chef Jim said: Can someone explain to me why this is ok and being allowed to happen? Anyone here on the left support this and if so why? It's Notre Dames fault. Ever since they allowed male cheerleaders. -) 1
DC Tom Posted November 9, 2019 Posted November 9, 2019 4 hours ago, Chef Jim said: Can someone explain to me why this is ok and being allowed to happen? Anyone here on the left support this and if so why? "Why are you so hateful?" 1
keepthefaith Posted November 10, 2019 Posted November 10, 2019 22 hours ago, Chef Jim said: Can someone explain to me why this is ok and being allowed to happen? Anyone here on the left support this and if so why? Crickets.
row_33 Posted November 10, 2019 Posted November 10, 2019 23 hours ago, njbuff said: Something needs to be done about this. There is NO WAY in the REAL WORLD that a biological male should ever be near a woman's sporting event. If I had daughters, this would outrage the hell out of me. Heck,, I don't even have daughters and it sickens me. liberals hate women everything they have to do with women is out to destroy them
OldTimeAFLGuy Posted November 10, 2019 Posted November 10, 2019 21 hours ago, 3rdnlng said: It's Notre Dames fault. Ever since they allowed male cheerleaders. -) ...Touchdown Jesus does NOT approve of this message....
B-Man Posted November 12, 2019 Author Posted November 12, 2019 'He wanted me to continue this fight': Widow of Maryland Rep. Elijah Cummings and key figure in Donald Trump's impeachment inquiry announces campaign for her husband's seat a month after the civil rights activist died by Chris Pleasance Original Article The widow of Democrat Elijah Cummings has announced she will run for the Baltimore seat he left vacant when he passed away last month aged 68. Maya Rockeymoore Cummings announced her candidacy Monday night, saying that her late husband 'wanted me to continue this fight.' Maya, who until now has been chair of the Maryland Democrat Party, said her husband had urged her to run for the seat as his health declined. . 1
Westside Posted November 12, 2019 Posted November 12, 2019 1 minute ago, B-Man said: 'He wanted me to continue this fight': Widow of Maryland Rep. Elijah Cummings and key figure in Donald Trump's impeachment inquiry announces campaign for her husband's seat a month after the civil rights activist died by Chris Pleasance Original Article The widow of Democrat Elijah Cummings has announced she will run for the Baltimore seat he left vacant when he passed away last month aged 68. Maya Rockeymoore Cummings announced her candidacy Monday night, saying that her late husband 'wanted me to continue this fight.' Maya, who until now has been chair of the Maryland Democrat Party, said her husband had urged her to run for the seat as his health declined. . Of course she will. Have to keep the corruption in the family. 1
Buffalo_Gal Posted November 12, 2019 Posted November 12, 2019 2 minutes ago, westside2 said: Of course she will. Have to keep the corruption in the family. I thought she was under investigation for something or another? Oh yeah, the IRS is looking into her "non-profit". It will not prevent her from winning, but I am pretty sure she's already got the corruption part down pat. 2
Deranged Rhino Posted November 12, 2019 Posted November 12, 2019 3 minutes ago, Buffalo_Gal said: I thought she was under investigation for something or another? Oh yeah, the IRS is looking into her "non-profit". It will not prevent her from winning, but I am pretty sure she's already got the corruption part down pat. Yup. She's perhaps more dirty than even her husband was. 1
Koko78 Posted November 13, 2019 Posted November 13, 2019 8 hours ago, Buffalo_Gal said: I thought she was under investigation for something or another? Oh yeah, the IRS is looking into her "non-profit". It will not prevent her from winning, but I am pretty sure she's already got the corruption part down pat. Of course, as a Democrat candidate for an elected office, she is now immune from investigation. Trump should be immediately impeached for allowing one of the agencies under him to investigate a political rival. 1
Recommended Posts