Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
Just now, Warcodered said:

I think it's so he can come back this season right?

Yes.  You have to make the 53 in order to be designated to return.

Posted
1 minute ago, 2020 Our Year For Sure said:

What is the point of this? Why not IR Croom now and keep Coleman?

 

So Coleman's salary doesn't have to be guarateed for the whole season.

Posted
Just now, thebandit27 said:

 

Because if they IR him now he can't be one of their 2 IR returns during the season.

 

 If he initially makes the 53, then he can 

 

I still don't understand why we would need Croom later with Kroft, Smith, Knox and Sweeney on the roster. Are they anticipating Kroft getting hurt again already?

Posted
Just now, Lurker said:

 

So Coleman's salary doesn't have to be guarateed for the whole season.

I believe that’s correct.

Posted
17 minutes ago, The Dean said:

 

You do realize, in a team sport like football, there are many contributions that aren't reflected in the stats. A guy can by 15 yards away from a tackle and be very influential on the play. He isn't a returner or gunner. But he contributes quite a bit. Same with offense. Josh throws a TD. RB runs for 20 yards. Maybe neither happens if DiMarco doesn't do his job.  

MAYBE is the key word. Trying to justify DiMarco's existence on this roster is hilarious to me

Posted
2 minutes ago, 2020 Our Year For Sure said:

What is the point of this? Why not IR Croom now and keep Coleman?

He can be brought back during the season if he's IR'd after making the 53.  If he goes on before that he's done for the year.

Posted
Just now, LBSeeBallLBGetBall said:

If Wade made it, it's because he's the only home run threat at RB.

 

Even if he makes the 53, I would expect he is inactive on game days until one of the other backs gets hurt.

Posted (edited)
4 minutes ago, from_dunkirk said:

 

Click on the arrow that point upward and to the right. McKenzie is one of the bold and underlined cuts. Screenshot was too big to upload here.

 

Or just go here go to Sherlock Holmes' post. Page 42 on this thread.

 

 

oh...that was his projected cuts from that roster list ..I did one too above it but i didnt write these are the cuts like he did...mines on page 40

Edited by Tsaikotic
  • Like (+1) 1
  • Haha (+1) 1
Posted
17 minutes ago, The Dean said:

 

Of course. Just sayin, if anyone really coveted him for the future, they could pull that move and lose little (one PS spot). But I don't expect it to happen. He'll be the Bills 11th PS guy.

 

The people who hate on fullbacks are schoop disciples, generally.

  • Haha (+1) 1
Posted
1 minute ago, Big C said:

 

Even if he makes the 53, I would expect he is inactive on game days until one of the other backs gets hurt.

That's fair.

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
×
×
  • Create New...