Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
57 minutes ago, BullBuchanan said:

The Colts had 4 good QBs a week ago, and one of them was getting cut. Now they keep all 3. The only QB they would want right now would be a guy like Eli. 

I in no way want Rivers to get hurt. But IF he did, it would be hilarious if Eli ended his career with the Chargers.

Posted
58 minutes ago, klos63 said:

You realize Barkley is playing well in preseason against 2nd and 3rd stringers, right? Not regular season against starters with a game plan. He looks good, but let's not get ahead of ourselves.

He's also playing WITH 2nd and 3rd stringers and without a game plan.

 

That's like saying "Well if you take out these lucky couple plays he had his game wasn't THAT good", without also eliminating his two worst or unlucky plays.  You can't do that and have a logical argument.  It's bending reality to fabricate a point.

Posted

I just don't see any possible way we would trade Barkley.   They would never offer a high enough pick and we don't have another option on the roster to fill the role.  

 

We aren't disrupting our sound situation. 

 

 

  • Like (+1) 1
Posted
5 minutes ago, 1ManRaid said:

He's also playing WITH 2nd and 3rd stringers and without a game plan.

 

That's like saying "Well if you take out these lucky couple plays he had his game wasn't THAT good", without also eliminating his two worst or unlucky plays.  You can't do that and have a logical argument.  It's bending reality to fabricate a point.

First point is true- most people in the game might not even be in the league in one week, yet that somehow is a gauge on how he will perform in a regular season game.

 

Second point is so wrong . It's not even remotely close to saying that. 

Posted

Definitely not trading Barkley. I think he is more of an asset to this team than just your average backup QB. 

Posted
19 minutes ago, White Linen said:

I just don't see any possible way we would trade Barkley.   They would never offer a high enough pick and we don't have another option on the roster to fill the role.  

 

We aren't disrupting our sound situation. 

 

 

 

...I agree...and erased Hamdan and Nall from speed dial.................

Posted
Just now, OldTimeAFLGuy said:

 

...I agree...and erased Hamdan and Nall from speed dial.................

The Chroise!!!

 

  • Haha (+1) 1
Posted
2 minutes ago, OldTimeAFLGuy said:

 

...I agree...and erased Hamdan and Nall from speed dial.................

Hamdan and Nall? Yikes!

  • Haha (+1) 1
Posted
1 hour ago, BullBuchanan said:

The Colts had 4 good QBs a week ago, and one of them was getting cut. Now they keep all 3. The only QB they would want right now would be a guy like Eli. 

I hope they trade for Eli, it would be surreal to see a Manning on the field in a Colts jersey again.

The team is “built to win now”, and just imagine,  Eli has a “Warner-esque” resurgence, and goes on to win a 3rd SB ring, topping his superior older brother, with the franchise where Peyton built his legacy... 

  • Like (+1) 1
Posted

He's a much more valuable asset being our #2 qb vs acquiring a 6th rounder, which is all you could realistically hope for with a trade.

Posted
2 hours ago, billsredneck1 said:

That's a big no for me. As a matter of fact if I were beans, Barkley would be signed long term and I'd make him the highest paid back up.

Someday the Bills will look back at Barkley's signing and say "we hit a homerun here"....he's going nowhere. 

Posted (edited)
12 hours ago, billsredneck1 said:

That's a big no for me. As a matter of fact if I were beans, Barkley would be signed long term and I'd make him the highest paid back up.

Yup, he's so good he's played in 12 games over a 6 year span. He's had 2 good games in his career and has played well this preseason, but he shouldn't be the highest paid back up QB, that's bad money management. He doesn't have an arm and floats long passes, which will work playing 2nd & 3rd string players who don't game plan for ya. JMO.

Edited by LOVEMESOMEBILLS
  • Awesome! (+1) 1
Posted

Would I trade Barkley. Of course, depending on the compensation. He looks like a capable backup at this point. He's made four touchdown passes that I thought were really quite good throws (regardless of the competition). Two to Duke, one to Perry and one to Philips. I'd trade him for Jacobi Brissett tho. More upside IMO. 

Posted

What do you think teams are going to give for a qb with a 67 career qb rating who was sitting in the couch 7 weeks into last season?  Barkley has no trade value unless a stupid team actually puts stock into preseason games.

  • Thank you (+1) 1
Posted

It wouldn't make sense for the Bills or the Colts. A backup QB is pretty valuable, so the Bills would have to go out and get one after trading Barkley. Barkley seems like a nice fit for the Bills. 

 

From the Colts perspective, Barkley doing well in the preseason is hardly a predictor of franchise QB type success. There will be some interesting names out there after the cuts, if they want to take a chance on someone. They probably would be best off struggling through this season and drafting someone next year. 

×
×
  • Create New...