Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

Btw, it was 16 years ago the last time a Republican got more votes in a presidential election than the Democrat. 
 

 

1 minute ago, Deranged Rhino said:

 

Go for it! 

Posted
Just now, Tiberius said:

Btw, it was 16 years ago the last time a Republican got more votes in a presidential election than the Democrat. 
 

 

BUCKLE UP, TIBBSY!!!!!!!!!!!!!!  IT’S A COMIN!!!!!!

Posted
Just now, DFT said:

BUCKLE UP, TIBBSY!!!!!!!!!!!!!!  IT’S A COMIN!!!!!!

It is! 
 

Bunch of old POS judges can’t hold back the emerging Democratic majority. Not going to happen 

  • Haha (+1) 1
Posted (edited)
7 minutes ago, Deranged Rhino said:

Romney out too. 

 

Collins as the third?

 

 

 

Just now, Tiberius said:

It is! 
 

Bunch of old POS judges can’t hold back the emerging Democratic majority. Not going to happen 

but.. you're delusional.

Edited by Foxx
  • Thank you (+1) 1
Posted
Just now, Tiberius said:

It is! 
 

Bunch of old POS judges can’t hold back the emerging Democratic majority. Not going to happen 

You’re buckled and you know it.  5-point harness.  Pink infant carrier.  No pics necessary...   It happened 

  • Haha (+1) 2
Posted
1 minute ago, Foxx said:

Collins as the third?


Collins was the first to say publicly she’s out. Romney is two — not sure there would be a third. But if there is, Mitch will walk it back after a head count. 

  • Thank you (+1) 2
Posted
Just now, Unforgiven said:

You have antifa and criminals on your side.

Is that how you see the majority of Americans? Sad, maybe you should move to Russia where their despotism is taken pure without the base alloy of hypocrisy 

Posted
1 minute ago, Deranged Rhino said:

Collins was the first to say publicly she’s out. Romney is two — not sure there would be a third. But if there is, Mitch will walk it back after a head count. 

 

Murkowski. 

  • Like (+1) 1
Posted
2 minutes ago, Foxx said:

Collins as the third?

 

 

 

but.. you're delusional.


If Collins loses her seat (assuming the vote is after the election), there is no reason for her to vote against. Heck, if she wins she has six years and no reason to vote against.

 

I am guessing Lisa Murkowski is a “no” as stated until offered enough incentives.

  • Like (+1) 1
  • Thank you (+1) 1
Posted
1 minute ago, Buffalo_Gal said:

If Collins loses her seat (assuming the vote is after the election), there is no reason for her to vote against. Heck, if she wins she has six years and no reason to vote against.

 

I am guessing Lisa Murkowski is a “no” as stated until offered enough incentives.

 

Susan don't want none of this:

 

th?id=OIP.umAKxd3gHLxbIEK-QUH6ewHaDh&pid

  • Like (+1) 2
×
×
  • Create New...