rockpile Posted April 5, 2005 Share Posted April 5, 2005 And squirrel? 296591[/snapback] Shake and Bake works well with squirrel. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ROCCEO Posted April 5, 2005 Share Posted April 5, 2005 lol, that's like 4 minutes away from my parents house. It just shows you what a moneymaker the plate is. So delicious, and in my estimate, no less than 1500 calories Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MattyT Posted April 8, 2005 Share Posted April 8, 2005 UPDATE: Nick's is suing The Lodge at Woodcliff for trademark infringement. http://www.democratandchronicle.com/apps/p...EWS01/504080401 After all the imitators -- at least a dozen -- Nick's finally decides to make a stink (pun intended). Do you suppose this may be because Woodcliff has deeper pockets than your average grease pit? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BRH Posted April 8, 2005 Share Posted April 8, 2005 UPDATE: Nick's is suing The Lodge at Woodcliff for trademark infringement. http://www.democratandchronicle.com/apps/p...EWS01/504080401 After all the imitators -- at least a dozen -- Nick's finally decides to make a stink (pun intended). Do you suppose this may be because Woodcliff has deeper pockets than your average grease pit? 300057[/snapback] I honestly don't understand how "Plat du Refuse" could be an infringement if, for example, Penfield Hots' "Rubbish Plate" isn't. Hell, the standard imitators even use the same ingredients as Nick's. And I think Brad Salai (I know him; Stephen is his first name but he goes by his middle name) pretty much answered Matty's question: "We have to allocate our resources where we think they will do the most good. We go after anyone we can find who is causing confusion," said Salai. In other words, the Woodcliff's got money and Gary Brockler (who owns Penfield Hots) doesn't. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ahr & Ahr & Associates Posted April 8, 2005 Share Posted April 8, 2005 UPDATE: Nick's is suing The Lodge at Woodcliff for trademark infringement. http://www.democratandchronicle.com/apps/p...EWS01/504080401 After all the imitators -- at least a dozen -- Nick's finally decides to make a stink (pun intended). Do you suppose this may be because Woodcliff has deeper pockets than your average grease pit? 300057[/snapback] Give him my number: (888) I SUE YOU. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hull, Kent67 Posted April 9, 2005 Share Posted April 9, 2005 Lived in Crapchester for a couple of years. Plates are awesome. The only thing I miss. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rockpile Posted April 9, 2005 Share Posted April 9, 2005 I honestly don't understand how "Plat du Refuse" could be an infringement if, for example, Penfield Hots' "Rubbish Plate" isn't. Hell, the standard imitators even use the same ingredients as Nick's. And I think Brad Salai (I know him; Stephen is his first name but he goes by his middle name) pretty much answered Matty's question: In other words, the Woodcliff's got money and Gary Brockler (who owns Penfield Hots) doesn't. 300063[/snapback] Also, no other restaurant got so much press for copying the Garbage Plate. Because they are upscale, they leaked the story to the press and got a lot of free advertising, while mentioning Tahoes several times and comparing it to the Plate in the article. Perinton. Bah! I hope Nick's wins. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bobblehead Posted April 9, 2005 Share Posted April 9, 2005 Also, no other restaurant got so much press for copying the Garbage Plate. Because they are upscale, they leaked the story to the press and got a lot of free advertising, while mentioning Tahoes several times and comparing it to the Plate in the article. Perinton. Bah! I hope Nick's wins. 300612[/snapback] The resturant was pretty much daring them to sue. I hope Nicks wins, too. Nothing personal, it's just business. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts