K-9 Posted August 5, 2019 Posted August 5, 2019 4 minutes ago, Chemical said: You don’t think Julio Jones helped Atlanta? Randy Moss didn’t help NE? You don’t actually have to win it all to be extremely helpful to your team winning games. You’re already defining success by only a super bowl ring and only the best WR in the league. If Tyree doesn’t make the helmet catch or ATL defense stops NE once they both have a ring in those years. You’re the one trying to be cute by selecting your own parameters to prove some point which escapes me. The only thing I can think you’re getting at is “the best wide receivers aren’t really the best for your team” ok, well then they’re not the best are they? Didn’t you just try to tell me AB isn’t a loser because he won a SB (that he didn’t actually win)? Seems you’re trying to define a parameter by holding up a Super Bowl win as a proof source, too. Being wrong about a player winning a SB can happen to anybody. Hypocrisy is another matter.
mannc Posted August 5, 2019 Posted August 5, 2019 4 minutes ago, Chemical said: You don’t think Julio Jones helped Atlanta? Randy Moss didn’t help NE? You don’t actually have to win it all to be extremely helpful to your team winning games. You’re already defining success by only a super bowl ring and only the best WR in the league. If Tyree doesn’t make the helmet catch or ATL defense stops NE once they both have a ring in those years. You’re the one trying to be cute by selecting your own parameters to prove some point which escapes me. The only thing I can think you’re getting at is “the best wide receivers aren’t really the best for your team” ok, well then they’re not the best are they? Chemical, relax. You're in an alternate universe called TBD, where the members are pissed that the GM tried to improve the worst receiver group in recent NFL history by signing a first-ballot hall of fame WR who's still near the peak of his career. As a corollary, they also believe that great WRs are to be avoided at all costs, especially ones who celebrate good plays. 2
Rock-A-Bye Beasley Posted August 5, 2019 Posted August 5, 2019 26 minutes ago, K-9 said: Didn’t you just try to tell me AB isn’t a loser because he won a SB (that he didn’t actually win)? Seems you’re trying to define a parameter by holding up a Super Bowl win as a proof source, too. Being wrong about a player winning a SB can happen to anybody. Hypocrisy is another matter. I already said I don’t care about your definition of a “loser”. AB clearly isn’t one by most people’s definition
K-9 Posted August 5, 2019 Posted August 5, 2019 3 minutes ago, Chemical said: I already said I don’t care about your definition of a “loser”. AB clearly isn’t one by most people’s definition We settled the issue on the definition of loser. We are now on to the issue of your hypocrisy of using SB wins as a proof source to establish a parameter in support of an argument. You told Gugny he shouldn’t do that when you tried the very same thing by referencing a SB win to support your claim about AB.* Nice deflection. *even though AB has never actually won a SB
Gugny Posted August 5, 2019 Posted August 5, 2019 9 minutes ago, Chemical said: I already said I don’t care about your definition of a “loser”. AB clearly isn’t one by most people’s definition Statistics and ability wise, you are correct. But he quit on his team. He is a "me first," loser in my book.
Rock-A-Bye Beasley Posted August 5, 2019 Posted August 5, 2019 2 minutes ago, K-9 said: We settled the issue on the definition of loser. We are now on to the issue of your hypocrisy of using SB wins as a proof source to establish a parameter in support of an argument. You told Gugny he shouldn’t do that when you tried the very same thing by referencing a SB win to support your claim about AB.* Nice deflection. *even though AB has never actually won a SB Difference is I’m not trying to prove anything 2 minutes ago, Gugny said: Statistics and ability wise, you are correct. But he quit on his team. He is a "me first," loser in my book. Thats fine if you think that. But I think the Bills would be much better this season with him on the team. I’m glad Beane tried to get him. No need to argue any further imo
Gugny Posted August 5, 2019 Posted August 5, 2019 2 minutes ago, Chemical said: Difference is I’m not trying to prove anything Thats fine if you think that. But I think the Bills would be much better this season with him on the team. I’m glad Beane tried to get him. No need to argue any further imo He couldn't be happy/was a disruption on a team with a HOF QB and the best RB (arguably) in the game. Personally, I was indifferent when learning about Beane's attempt to trade for him. I could see the good and the bad. My guess is that it would have been more bad than good. Going from Ben Roethlisberger to a sophomore QB would have likely led to him being unhappy very quickly. We'll never know. But he still downgraded significantly by heading to the Raiders (team and QB). I look forward to watching this one unfold.
K-9 Posted August 5, 2019 Posted August 5, 2019 3 minutes ago, Chemical said: Difference is I’m not trying to prove anything Thats fine if you think that. But I think the Bills would be much better this season with him on the team. I’m glad Beane tried to get him. No need to argue any further imo Again, nice deflection. It’s not about what you’re trying to prove or not prove. It’s about using a SB win to establish a parameter in support of an argument. Just like gugny did. And I was done “arguing” the Brown issue a while ago.
Rock-A-Bye Beasley Posted August 5, 2019 Posted August 5, 2019 Just now, K-9 said: Again, nice deflection. It’s not about what you’re trying to prove or not prove. It’s about using a SB win to establish a parameter in support of an argument. Just like gugny did. And I was done “arguing” the Brown issue a while ago. I agree using a super bowl win as evidence of anything is a weak argument. (Which I tried incorrectly to do) but it doesn’t change the fact that AB isn’t a loser by most standards.
K-9 Posted August 5, 2019 Posted August 5, 2019 3 minutes ago, Chemical said: I agree using a super bowl win as evidence of anything is a weak argument. (Which I tried incorrectly to do) but it doesn’t change the fact that AB isn’t a loser by most standards. What does quitting on your team, coaches, and fans the week of the most important game of the year because a playoff birth is on the line mean then? What does openly mocking a teammate on Twitter for being named team MVP instead of you suggest? What “standard” does that apply? 1
SlimShady'sSpaceForce Posted August 5, 2019 Posted August 5, 2019 I found a place that could help him recommended by this guy 1
stinky finger Posted August 5, 2019 Posted August 5, 2019 (edited) 16 hours ago, OldTimeAFLGuy said: ...Wrecks can fix 'em up....... AB’s such loser even HE’S uncomfortable in his own skin. Edited August 5, 2019 by inaugural balls 1
Doc Posted August 5, 2019 Posted August 5, 2019 10 minutes ago, ShadyBillsFan said: I found a place that could help him recommended by this guy Now if that were the type of masseuse working there, I could see... 1
formerlyofCtown Posted August 5, 2019 Posted August 5, 2019 4 hours ago, Chemical said: Locker room cancer? He missed one game at the end of the year last season. What about the rumors of Ben being racist? The Steelers were a pretty good team in his time there. I’ll take that type of carcinogen in the locker room any day. Y’all just mad he didn’t want to come to Buffalo, but why blame him? We haven’t had a good passing offense in years. Our top 3 receivers combined don’t get as many yards as a #1 receiver. I dont want to live in NY state either so cant see myself holding that against him.
DC Tom Posted August 5, 2019 Posted August 5, 2019 17 hours ago, BillsRdue said: Take a look at The Feet . Looks painful. Truly, the Agony of Da Feet. 1
K-9 Posted August 5, 2019 Posted August 5, 2019 28 minutes ago, DC Tom said: Truly, the Agony of Da Feet.
1st&ten Posted August 5, 2019 Posted August 5, 2019 On 8/4/2019 at 3:21 PM, PromoTheRobot said: Some are doing that over Morse. Yep, Sully has an article about it already.
Saxum Posted August 5, 2019 Posted August 5, 2019 8 hours ago, Chemical said: Locker room cancer? He missed one game at the end of the year last season. What about the rumors of Ben being racist? The Steelers were a pretty good team in his time there. I’ll take that type of carcinogen in the locker room any day. Y’all just mad he didn’t want to come to Buffalo, but why blame him? We haven’t had a good passing offense in years. Our top 3 receivers combined don’t get as many yards as a #1 receiver. Like the rumor of you making chemical weapons which cause cancer sometimes rumors are false. Sometimes! 7 hours ago, Chemical said: He’s a loser who has won the Super Bowl nice try. Listen to Chemical agent, he is expert at losers.
Recommended Posts