Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

 

 

MICKEY KAUS: Jeffrey Epstein, Red Pill: Why This Scandal Should Just Be Getting Started.

We’re in the middle of a global populist surge. There’s a sense that elites are not playing by the same rules as everyone else. They might not even be playing the same game. It’s pretty clear that Epstein was running some kind of a sex ring for the rich and well connected. How big a ring? We don’t know until we try to find out. But there are reports out there [click if you dare] that it’s bigger than we might think — bigger than old, familiar Prince Andrew, involving a non-trivial cross-section of business and entertainment leaders, plus some prominent Anglo-American families and maybe a handful of nation states.

 

Do we live in a society where people try to get rich so they can build bigger houses, drive faster cars, wear nice clothes and send their children to the best schools. Or is that really a facade behind which they escape into a secret lawless world where they order up underage girls and boys to rape and abuse? Are we living in Disney movie or a Girl with the Dragon Tattoo movie?

 

Don’t we want to know? If we follow the Epstein case to its conclusion, we might learn which is the reality. Epstein’s the biggest red pill we’ve been handed in decades.

 

 

A lot of people are eager for us to forget all about it.

 
 
 
.
  • Like (+1) 3
  • Thank you (+1) 1
Posted
5 hours ago, Hedge said:

 

 

 

Well, it seems that we will know very soon whether or not we have an independent judiciary.

  • Like (+1) 1
Posted
6 minutes ago, Koko78 said:

 

Well, it seems that we will know very soon whether or not we have an independent judiciary.

 

At least according to Wikipedia:

Quote

Preska was nominated by President George H. W. Bush on March 31, 1992, to a seat on the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York

...

In 2007, it was reported that Judge Preska was on President Bush's short list of potential Supreme Court nominees.[3] On September 9, 2008, Preska was nominated by President George W. Bush to be a United States Circuit Judge for the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit.[4] As Preska was nominated after July 1, 2008, the unofficial start date of the Thurmond Rule during a presidential election year,[clarification needed] no hearings were scheduled on her nomination, and the nomination was returned to Bush at the end of his term.[citation needed]

 

So, by my calculations:

 

         ✔️  Double plus bonus points for 2 Deep State ties from the same family  

          ⚱️   Papa Bush

:beer:Unsealed the first batch of documents

          ?  Possibly believes

=

 

drumroll.PNG.eac6031c673aae4f7d1bed6993c869ae.PNG

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Image result for i don't know

Posted
7 hours ago, Koko78 said:

 

Well, it seems that we will know very soon whether or not we have an independent judiciary.

in an old boys network, what is the expected outcome?

Posted
33 minutes ago, Deranged Rhino said:

 

 

Looks like we're also on track for the 12th for the release of these docs.

 

Quote

 

The case files are known to contain claims by Giuffre that she was sexually abused by “numerous prominent American politicians, powerful business executives, foreign presidents, a well-known Prime Minister and other world leaders.”

 

“Did you people not talk about this?” Preska asked the lawyers in federal court in Manhattan when she was told there was no plan in place for reviewing the documents.

 

Preska ended the hearing with a tentative plan to have the attorneys take the next two weeks to hash out a process for categorizing the thousands of pages of sealed documents.

 

 

  • Like (+1) 1
Posted

 

Quote

Officers at the Metropolitan Correctional Center recently let an accused CIA leaker obtain electronic devices to continue to steal and transmit classified information, according to the documents. They let a fraudster with ties to the Clintons get his hands on a smartphone that he used to falsify evidence. They even let an Islamic terrorist have access to al Qaeda propaganda — including bomb-making instructions — that he distributed to ­fellow inmates.

...

Last year, according to the documents, a former CIA employee allegedly responsible for “the largest unauthorized public disclosure of CIA information in the history of the agency” was able to get two iPhones into his cell at the MCC. The outrageous security breach was aided by correctional officers.

“The contraband cellphones were smuggled into the MCC and protected from detection through a network of visitors to the facility, inmates and correctional officers,” FBI agent Jeff Donaldson wrote in an October affidavit for a search warrant that was recently unsealed and obtained by The Post.

 

  • Like (+1) 1
  • Haha (+1) 1
  • Thank you (+1) 1
Posted

This could go in a number of threads, but I will post it here for the Epstein/Wexner/Victoria's Secret linkage, since it begins and ends with "yachting", and there is quite the speculation that Victoria's Secret is also a front for a premium escort service. 

 

Thread. And there is a surprise cameo appearance at the end. It's quite a tangled web.

 

 

 

  • Thank you (+1) 2
Posted (edited)
17 minutes ago, Hedge said:

This could go in a number of threads, but I will post it here for the Epstein/Wexner/Victoria's Secret linkage, since it begins and ends with "yachting", and there is quite the speculation that Victoria's Secret is also a front for a premium escort service. 

 

Thread. And there is a surprise cameo appearance at the end. It's quite a tangled web.

 

 

 

 

 

This stuff doesn't really bother me, because the women are willing participants. It can't be a surprise that rich guys are attracting women with their wealth (in some of these countries, prostitution is legal anyway), they are just able to cast a wider net now, with social media, uh..."bringing the world together".

Edited by OJ Tom
  • Like (+1) 1
Posted
51 minutes ago, OJ Tom said:

 

 

This stuff doesn't really bother me, because the women are willing participants. It can't be a surprise that rich guys are attracting women with their wealth (in some of these countries, prostitution is legal anyway), they are just able to cast a wider net now, with social media, uh..."bringing the world together".

 

If it was only contractual sex, between willing, and of age, participants, that's one thing. And I would agree with you.

But, this is also about more than just one thing.

 

Yachting is also used to peddle influence and for blackmail purposes, the same MO as Epstein.

For example:

  • Princeling orders up a dozen women for his yacht party.
  • Princeling also has other guests, for instance, politicians, policy makers, and other political movers and shakers. 
  • Princeling offers the women to the guests. Women these guests would never otherwise stand a shot with (and couldn't afford to rent themselves).

Then from here:

  • Guests enjoy themselves and want to be invited back for more. How do they manage this? Curry favor by supporting the causes of the Princeling.
  • Regardless of whether they wish another trip on the yacht, those who don't want their families destroyed, or to be embarrassed in other ways, can now be blackmailed unless they support the causes of the Princeling.
Posted
6 hours ago, Hedge said:

 

If it was only contractual sex, between willing, and of age, participants, that's one thing. And I would agree with you.

But, this is also about more than just one thing.

 

Yachting is also used to peddle influence and for blackmail purposes, the same MO as Epstein.

For example:

  • Princeling orders up a dozen women for his yacht party.
  • Princeling also has other guests, for instance, politicians, policy makers, and other political movers and shakers. 
  • Princeling offers the women to the guests. Women these guests would never otherwise stand a shot with (and couldn't afford to rent themselves).

Then from here:

  • Guests enjoy themselves and want to be invited back for more. How do they manage this? Curry favor by supporting the causes of the Princeling.
  • Regardless of whether they wish another trip on the yacht, those who don't want their families destroyed, or to be embarrassed in other ways, can now be blackmailed unless they support the causes of the Princeling.

Sounds very similar to owning a golf course? 

Posted
7 hours ago, Hedge said:

This could go in a number of threads, but I will post it here for the Epstein/Wexner/Victoria's Secret linkage, since it begins and ends with "yachting", and there is quite the speculation that Victoria's Secret is also a front for a premium escort service. 

 

Thread. And there is a surprise cameo appearance at the end. It's quite a tangled web.

 

 

 

Wait... is that actually Victoria's secret? Could they be that blatant with their naming? 

  • Like (+1) 1
Posted
9 hours ago, Hedge said:

This could go in a number of threads, but I will post it here for the Epstein/Wexner/Victoria's Secret linkage, since it begins and ends with "yachting", and there is quite the speculation that Victoria's Secret is also a front for a premium escort service. 

 

Thread. And there is a surprise cameo appearance at the end. It's quite a tangled web.

 

 

 

 

Seriously...why else would anyone buy a yacht except to bang high-priced call girls in international waters outside any nation's legal jurisdiction?  

 

I thought that was the entire reason rich guys bought boats the size of a WWII troop transport.

  • Like (+1) 1
Posted (edited)
19 hours ago, Hedge said:

 

If it was only contractual sex, between willing, and of age, participants, that's one thing. And I would agree with you.

But, this is also about more than just one thing.

 

Yachting is also used to peddle influence and for blackmail purposes, the same MO as Epstein.

For example:

  • Princeling orders up a dozen women for his yacht party.
  • Princeling also has other guests, for instance, politicians, policy makers, and other political movers and shakers. 
  • Princeling offers the women to the guests. Women these guests would never otherwise stand a shot with (and couldn't afford to rent themselves).

Then from here:

  • Guests enjoy themselves and want to be invited back for more. How do they manage this? Curry favor by supporting the causes of the Princeling.
  • Regardless of whether they wish another trip on the yacht, those who don't want their families destroyed, or to be embarrassed in other ways, can now be blackmailed unless they support the causes of the Princeling.

 

Unless they are women are underage, or somehow being forced to comply, I don't think it would be that effective for blackmail. I mean, I doubt it would take that elaborate of a plan to make deals with these corrupt politicians, and these party favors are probably more along the lines of "celebrations after closing a "deal". 

 

 The thing that surprises me, is how famous many of these women are.

Edited by OJ Tom
×
×
  • Create New...