Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted (edited)
4 minutes ago, Deranged Rhino said:

 

Promo, you're barking up the wrong tree. Epstein doesn't get arrested if Trump isn't POTUS. Barr's DOJ indicted him. If they wanted to bump him off they could have done it any number of ways before he was incarcerated. 

 

There is no deeper Trump\Epstein connection waiting to be exposed. 

 

There IS a deeper Clinton \ Epstein connection which was JUST exposed the day before he died. 

 

Is that the latest Q breadcrumb? And you are kidding yourself if you don't think Trump, and a number of other powerful folks including Bill Clinton, aren't in deeper with Epstein's underage harem. 

Edited by PromoTheRobot
Posted
3 minutes ago, Deranged Rhino said:

 

Its even funnier when you tune into any news channel or feed. 

 

The same group who pushed a baseless conspiracy theory about Trump being a Russian asset (with ZERO evidence) for two years thinks even suggesting a potential Clinton connection to the death is a bridge too far. ?

 

These are also the same people who pushed baseless Kavanaugh gang rape charges for weeks and weeks with zero evidence — but talk about the trail of bodies in the Clinton’s wake is a deplatforming worthy offense. 

 

Look at asshats in this thread who believed and pushed trump Russia without evidence (still to this day) trying to take a high ground in this thread claiming conspiracies are dangerous. 

 

They are exposing themselves day in and day out as people who are not interested in truth. Are not interested in justice. Don’t care about protecting children from predators if that predator has a D before his or her name. They’ve exposed themselves as enemies of truth and justice. 

 

And they can all ***** off. 

I used to be the one that thought we as a society had advanced beyond such atrocities as child rape/slavery, infanticide and anything goes politics. Of course there was always the odd exception of the rare sick human that would diddle the 10-year old or set a cat on fire but what we're seeing today is beyond comprehension. Some people celebrate that we are living in the best of times because everyone has a smart phone and backup cameras come standard on our new cars. I fear we have lost our individual compasses and are traveling down paths that will lead us to our own destruction. 

  • Like (+1) 2
Posted
8 minutes ago, PromoTheRobot said:

 

Is that the latest Q breadcrumb? And you are kidding yourself if you don't think Trump, and a number of other powerful folks including Bill Clinton, aren't in deeper with Epstein's underage harem. 

On what basis do you make this charge?

Posted
20 minutes ago, PromoTheRobot said:

 

Except he was supposed to be under suicide watch,

 

No, that was lifted weeks ago. 

 

20 minutes ago, PromoTheRobot said:

but curiously wasn't monitored.

 

He was monitored, perhaps negligently. But not according to a suicide watch protocol.

 

20 minutes ago, PromoTheRobot said:

AG Barr was "appalled" that this happened under federal detention. Oopsies.

 

The truth is that prison guards get paid crap and are not all that diligent in their duty, if they take it seriously at all. This is based on too much exposure to federal prisons over a period of time. 

 

I'd like to think that they would put forth extra effort to watch Epstein given who he is but it wouldn't shock me if they were playing Angry Birds on their phones for 5 hours. 

Posted
12 minutes ago, Buffalo_Gal said:

Let the lawsuits begin! (continue)
 

 

 

Wasn't the Aaron Hernandez guilty verdict overturned when he committed suicide? I think it was then re-instated after that, however. But I think, in the brief period of time when it was overturned, his assets were protected from lawsuits.

  • Like (+1) 1
Posted
1 minute ago, BeginnersMind said:

The truth is that prison guards get paid crap and are not all that diligent in their duty, if they take it seriously at all.

 

^^^^ bulllllllsht 

Posted
8 minutes ago, PromoTheRobot said:

 

On what basis do you all make yours?

I suggest you read through this thread so you educate yourself rather than make yourself seem foolish.

  • Like (+1) 2
Posted (edited)
18 minutes ago, 3rdnlng said:

On what basis do you make this charge?

 

On the basis that the President has no direct oversight over his Department of Justice (which he has direct oversight of), but does have direct oversight over a couple of prison guards (whom he does not have direct oversight of).

 

And so the Trump DoJ indicted Epstein, knowing that the President would be outed for criminal behavior which the public would be outraged over directly before the upcoming election cycle; but then Trump had his minions at a Federal prison take him out, because that chain of command clearly is direct, and everyone knows that prison guards are in close contact with the Oval.

 

Also important to note is that leaked Democratic talking points on the issue state to not link to, nor reference, the primary source documents which seem to clear the President of anything untoward, is in no way suspicious.

 

What about this is so hard to understand?

Edited by TakeYouToTasker
  • Like (+1) 4
Posted
1 hour ago, BeginnersMind said:

 

image.png.81e3eec8c9a549ad04ff4c35ce897329.png

 

re·turn
/rəˈtərn/
noun

a key pressed on a computer keyboard to simulate a carriage return in a word-processing program, or to indicate the end of a command or data string.

 

Did you do that on porpoise?

 

image.png.276fffcf3799050dac458a42c963d9ea.png

Posted
3 minutes ago, TakeYouToTasker said:

 

On the basis that the President has no direct oversight over his Department of Justice (which he has direct oversight of), but does have direct oversight over a couple of prison guards (whom he does not have direct oversight of).

 

And so the Trump DoJ indicted Epstein, knowing that the President would be outed for criminal behavior which the public would be outraged over directly before the upcoming election cycle; but then Trump then Trump had his minions at a Federal prison take him out, because that chain of command clearly is direct, and everyone knows that prison guards are in close contact with the Oval.

 

Also important to note is that leaked Democratic talking points on the issue state to not link to, nor reference, the primary source documents which seem to clear the President of anything untoward, is in no way suspicious.

 

What about this is so hard to understand?

It amazes me that anyone as ignorant of the subject as Promo would choose to even discuss the matter without taking the approach of educating themselves first.

  • Thank you (+1) 1
Posted

 

15 minutes ago, Teddy KGB said:

 

^^^^ bulllllllsht 

 

You think prison guards are generally well paid at $15-$25/hour and dedicated to their craft? 

 

You are welcome to that opinion. Having a fair amount of experience with them, I’ll keep to mine as a general rule of thumb. 

Posted

 

1 hour ago, MILFHUNTER#518 said:

He also pointed out how it was literally IMPOSSIBLE to hanf oneself with the equipment in the cell. There was no where to tie your noose.

 

The jail issued clothing wasnt strong enough to not rip when you were suspended.

 

There's always a way.  If someone wants to commit suicide, they're going to.

Posted
15 minutes ago, TakeYouToTasker said:

 

On the basis that the President has no direct oversight over his Department of Justice (which he has direct oversight of), but does have direct oversight over a couple of prison guards (whom he does not have direct oversight of).

 

And so the Trump DoJ indicted Epstein, knowing that the President would be outed for criminal behavior which the public would be outraged over directly before the upcoming election cycle; but then Trump had his minions at a Federal prison take him out, because that chain of command clearly is direct, and everyone knows that prison guards are in close contact with the Oval.

 

Also important to note is that leaked Democratic talking points on the issue state to not link to, nor reference, the primary source documents which seem to clear the President of anything untoward, is in no way suspicious.

 

What about this is so hard to understand?

 

 I’d just throw in the point that MCC’s resources are a lot more complex than just ‘a couple prison guards’, and a federal witness with as much information as Epstein is a higher priority prisoner within the facility.

×
×
  • Create New...