Cinga Posted July 23, 2020 Posted July 23, 2020 11 minutes ago, RochesterRob said: I nominate your post for most idiotic of the year. Why would Acosta wait on a promise that most likely would not have ever happened when your supposed deal would have been struck? How would Trump promise a cabinet position that he was in no position to offer at the time. If a deal were struck back at that time would not Acosta seek something he could realistically get from Trump such as money? Do you barter for nonexistent compensation at the time you are suppose to perform your part of the deal. Do you do a full day's work on some guy's plumbing to use a cottage on a lake that the home owner in question does not have nor will likely ever have? It's just @Tiberius jumping to conclusions again
RochesterRob Posted July 23, 2020 Posted July 23, 2020 2 minutes ago, Gary M said: It is very likely that Acosta gave him a light sentence because he or his boss at the time was on one of JEs videos!!!! Somebody in Acosta's immediate environment politically most likely had Acosta place his finger on the scale in favor of Epstein. Then there is always the possibility like DWI a couple generations ago that the whole matter was treated very lightly because "we don't want ruin somebody's life over a "trivial" matter."
WEATHER DOT COM Posted July 23, 2020 Posted July 23, 2020 1 minute ago, TBBills said: Trump and the Clinton's would both be in big trouble if they didn't have this guy killed. Clinton and Trump families used to be pretty tight knit. What a ruse they have pulled on the people.
RochesterRob Posted July 23, 2020 Posted July 23, 2020 16 minutes ago, Cinga said: It's just @Tiberius jumping to conclusions again More likely that Tiberius' masters at the Soros Institute got some bad internal polling information about Biden. That the public numbers about Biden being double digits ahead of Trump don't even play in the nut house. 1
Tiberius Posted July 23, 2020 Posted July 23, 2020 29 minutes ago, RochesterRob said: I nominate your post for most idiotic of the year. Why would Acosta wait on a promise that most likely would not have ever happened when your supposed deal would have been struck? How would Trump promise a cabinet position that he was in no position to offer at the time. If a deal were struck back at that time would not Acosta seek something he could realistically get from Trump such as money? Do you barter for nonexistent compensation at the time you are suppose to perform your part of the deal. Do you do a full day's work on some guy's plumbing to use a cottage on a lake that the home owner in question does not have nor will likely ever have? Easy, he remembered the favor done for his gang of thieves. Certainly Alan Dershowitz reminded Trump of the help Acosta was in freeing Epstein. Trump knows how to use people. Now hes wishing a child molesting scum bag well. Would you wish a person like that well? A child molester!
RochesterRob Posted July 23, 2020 Posted July 23, 2020 3 minutes ago, Tiberius said: Easy, he remembered the favor done for his gang of thieves. Certainly Alan Dershowitz reminded Trump of the help Acosta was in freeing Epstein. Trump knows how to use people. Now hes wishing a child molesting scum bag well. Would you wish a person like that well? A child molester! Your first paragraph was pure gibberish. Are you cracking under the pressure of pushing dementia Joe across the finish line? As far as Maxwell goes he is saying what most people would say when someone is undergoing the legal process and the verdict is not in. Let Maxwell be declared guilty by the court then the lambasting of Maxwell can begin without threat of a libel suit.
Tiberius Posted July 23, 2020 Posted July 23, 2020 1 minute ago, RochesterRob said: Your first paragraph was pure gibberish. Are you cracking under the pressure of pushing dementia Joe across the finish line? As far as Maxwell goes he is saying what most people would say when someone is undergoing the legal process and the verdict is not in. Let Maxwell be declared guilty by the court then the lambasting of Maxwell can begin without threat of a libel suit. Would you be wishing a child molester well?
RochesterRob Posted July 23, 2020 Posted July 23, 2020 1 minute ago, Tiberius said: Would you be wishing a child molester well? If it was upon the advice of my lawyers concerning a person engaged in the legal system who could sue for defamation because no guilty verdict has been delivered then yes. The lambasting can wait until the guilty verdict is read. You know this so stop being intellectually dishonest.
Tiberius Posted July 23, 2020 Posted July 23, 2020 1 minute ago, RochesterRob said: If it was upon the advice of my lawyers concerning a person engaged in the legal system who could sue for defamation because no guilty verdict has been delivered then yes. The lambasting can wait until the guilty verdict is read. You know this so stop being intellectually dishonest. He was just asked a question about a child molester and he said he wished her well. Sick. That's the guy you elected. 1
RochesterRob Posted July 23, 2020 Posted July 23, 2020 Just now, Tiberius said: He was just asked a question about a child molester and he said he wished her well. Sick. That's the guy you elected. You can keep pitching that manure but nobody here is buying it. Time to load it it on the spreader and head for the field where it might do some good.
Tiberius Posted July 23, 2020 Posted July 23, 2020 Just now, RochesterRob said: You can keep pitching that manure but nobody here is buying it. Time to load it it on the spreader and head for the field where it might do some good. Biden is going to smash Trump with that during the debates. Whose going to vote for a guy that helps child molesters?
RochesterRob Posted July 23, 2020 Posted July 23, 2020 1 minute ago, Tiberius said: Biden is going to smash Trump with that during the debates. Whose going to vote for a guy that helps child molesters? Biden might be dead before then. Biden is finished if he is not allowed an ear piece that allows him to get material spoon fed to him. Trump will insist no ear pieces be worn by Biden. If Biden has hearing issues then the questions can be printed on cards to minimize cheating.
Tiberius Posted July 23, 2020 Posted July 23, 2020 10 minutes ago, B-Man said: Trump wishes her well. Just now, RochesterRob said: Biden might be dead before then. Biden is finished if he is not allowed an ear piece that allows him to get material spoon fed to him. Trump will insist no ear pieces be worn by Biden. If Biden has hearing issues then the questions can be printed on cards to minimize cheating. Biden can be dead and still beat Trump. Biden could be dead and be a better president than Trump.
RochesterRob Posted July 23, 2020 Posted July 23, 2020 1 minute ago, Tiberius said: Trump wishes her well. Biden can be dead and still beat Trump. Biden could be dead and be a better president than Trump. Now you are just flinging manure. Take it to the corn field where it might do some good. Anyways, it is easy to see that Biden's health is plummeting. Most people that decline so rapidly are not long lived.
3rdnlng Posted July 23, 2020 Posted July 23, 2020 1 hour ago, RochesterRob said: I nominate your post for most idiotic of the year. Why would Acosta wait on a promise that most likely would not have ever happened when your supposed deal would have been struck? How would Trump promise a cabinet position that he was in no position to offer at the time. If a deal were struck back at that time would not Acosta seek something he could realistically get from Trump such as money? Do you barter for nonexistent compensation at the time you are suppose to perform your part of the deal. Do you do a full day's work on some guy's plumbing to use a cottage on a lake that the home owner in question does not have nor will likely ever have? He doesn't do a full days work on any individual guy's plumbing. Being the snake that he is he sweats joints & nipples, puts elbows in place and cleans pipes. As a plumber he sucks but he has the unique ability to handle many kinds of nuts.
Cinga Posted July 23, 2020 Posted July 23, 2020 1 hour ago, RochesterRob said: More likely that Tiberius' masters at the Soros Institute got some bad internal polling information about Biden. That the public numbers about Biden being double digits ahead of Trump don't even play in the nut house. yeah, I saw something the other day saying pollsters expect a below average turnout from Republicans this year since they is what they got in 2012 for Democrats in Obama second go around. That's why they are typically polling Republicans 7 points lower that their numbers should be. Pretty crappy assumption I think they are really using to try and discourage Republican from going to the polls but i think this will be a way above average turnout for Republicans because of all the anti-Trump crap we're seeing. Time will tell....
Tiberius Posted July 23, 2020 Posted July 23, 2020 2 minutes ago, Cinga said: yeah, I saw something the other day saying pollsters expect a below average turnout from Republicans this year since they is what they got in 2012 for Democrats in Obama second go around. That's why they are typically polling Republicans 7 points lower that their numbers should be. Pretty crappy assumption I think they are really using to try and discourage Republican from going to the polls but i think this will be a way above average turnout for Republicans because of all the anti-Trump crap we're seeing. Time will tell.... Dem turnout is going to be huge. Millions of older Americans have died in last four years and millions of new voters have come of age and registered. Women hate Trump a lot. Biggest gender gap in history
Cinga Posted July 23, 2020 Posted July 23, 2020 59 minutes ago, RochesterRob said: Now you are just flinging manure. Take it to the corn field where it might do some good. Anyways, it is easy to see that Biden's health is plummeting. Most people that decline so rapidly are not long lived. But they have Hillary, the rightful heir to the throne waiting in the wings....
leh-nerd skin-erd Posted July 23, 2020 Posted July 23, 2020 1 minute ago, Cinga said: yeah, I saw something the other day saying pollsters expect a below average turnout from Republicans this year since they is what they got in 2012 for Democrats in Obama second go around. That's why they are typically polling Republicans 7 points lower that their numbers should be. Pretty crappy assumption I think they are really using to try and discourage Republican from going to the polls but i think this will be a way above average turnout for Republicans because of all the anti-Trump crap we're seeing. Time will tell.... I think with the country burning from the inside out, and an entrenched dem representing a 'centrist and unifying' position including ending our symbiotic relationship with energy we have in abundance, a reliance on a socialist platform and an extraordinarily expensive green new deal, and labelling a million of our fellow citizens as 'the enemy' because they enforce laws...it makes perfect sense that they would stay at home and let a demented dipsh7t with a history of absurd racial commentary become president. Everyone I know is repeating the following catch phrase: Look to 2012. 1
Recommended Posts