Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
7 minutes ago, LB3 said:

 

 


I'm sayin'....

The people thinking "this is bad for Trump" are smokin' some bad stuff and listening to the wrong sponsors.

 

  • Like (+1) 4
  • Haha (+1) 1
  • Thank you (+1) 2
Posted
3 minutes ago, dubs said:


Well, I can provide an example. 
 

It would be something like saying, “I did not have sexual relations with that woman, Miss Lewinski” when in fact you did have sexual relations with Miss Lewinski. 

So total lie is like saying the same but replacing lie with truth. Thats what I thought!

  • Haha (+1) 1
Posted
Just now, Reality Check said:

 

 

There is no way on God's green Earth that it's a coincidence.

 

 

I love watching the TDS logic.

 

1. Maxwell hasn't been arrested because it would be bad for Trump.

2. Barr is Trump’s lackey.

3. Barr fired Berman to protect Trump.

 

 (Berman is gone and Maxwell is finally arrested.)

 

4. Trump should be scared.

 

  • Like (+1) 5
  • Haha (+1) 3
  • Awesome! (+1) 1
  • Thank you (+1) 2
Posted
1 minute ago, LB3 said:

I love watching the TDS logic.

 

1. Maxwell hasn't been arrested because it would be bad for Trump.

2. Barr is Trump’s lackey.

3. Barr fired Berman to protect Trump.

 

 (Berman is gone and Maxwell is finally arrested.)

 

4. Trump should be scared.

 

 

That sums it up beautifully.

  • Like (+1) 1
Posted
6 minutes ago, LB3 said:

I love watching the TDS logic.

 

1. Maxwell hasn't been arrested because it would be bad for Trump.

2. Barr is Trump’s lackey.

3. Barr fired Berman to protect Trump.

 

 (Berman is gone and Maxwell is finally arrested.)

 

4. Trump should be scared.

 

 

In their defense, "logic" has as specific a meaning as "defund"

  • Like (+1) 1
  • Haha (+1) 1
Posted
1 minute ago, billsfan1959 said:

 

In their defense, "logic" has as specific a meaning as "defund"

? Speaking of Logic, it's amazing that that moron has become a respected thinker on the main board in the Wuhan Flu era.

  • Haha (+1) 1
Posted
1 hour ago, wnyguy said:

 

 

He was also escorted out of Trumps property when he was accused of doing something unseemly to a young girl. I believe it was Trump who ordered him out.

 

AND, Trump is the only one of his stature who walked in and offered to testify AGAINST Epstein in that Florida case!

  • Like (+1) 1
  • Thank you (+1) 2
Posted
56 minutes ago, dubs said:

It’s encouraging to see her arrested, but I’ve gotten to the point where I just find it hard to believe anyone of any significance will ever go down on these things. 
 

 

 

 

...charges are from 1994-1997......anybody see a problem for a jury to convict on something from 23-26 years ago?............

Posted
2 minutes ago, Cinga said:

 

AND, Trump is the only one of his stature who walked in and offered to testify AGAINST Epstein in that Florida case!

 

There are SO MANY sources for this. Too bad the lamestream media covers them up. I think I have papers in the armoire that can prove it for the folks here in PPP. 

  • Like (+1) 1
Posted
Just now, LB3 said:

? Speaking of Logic, it's amazing that that moron has become a respected thinker on the main board in the Wuhan Flu era.

 

Mind boggling, but not surprising. They tend to welcome any view there, as long it is isn't different from theirs. Because they are the enlightened, tolerant ones....

  • Like (+1) 2
Posted
27 minutes ago, dubs said:


Well, I can provide an example. 
 

It would be something like saying, “I did not have sexual relations with that woman, Miss Lewinski” when in fact you did have sexual relations with Miss Lewinski. 

 

Define SEX

Posted
Just now, Cinga said:

 

AND, Trump is the only one of his stature who walked in and offered to testify AGAINST Epstein in that Florida case!

 

 

When you say Trump do you mean Donald Trump? President Donald Trump? The one everyone is pointing fingers at as being a friend and accomplice to Epstein and Maxwell? That Trump? {sarcasm off)

  • Haha (+1) 1
Posted
Just now, Winston Zeddemore said:

 

There are charges beyond those years as well. 

 

 

...beyond or more current?......I'm guessing much would depend upon statute of limitations, but the attorneys bringing charges must know.....could see defense attorneys making a big deal about the age of initial charges to cast doubt.....

Posted
5 minutes ago, Cinga said:

 

Define SEX

 

Just grab the Webster's Dictionary you have that is holding up your coffee table. ?

Posted
2 minutes ago, OldTimeAFLGuy said:

 

 

...beyond or more current?......I'm guessing much would depend upon statute of limitations, but the attorneys bringing charges must know.....could see defense attorneys making a big deal about the age of initial charges to cast doubt.....

 

The bit of the indictment I've seen there appears to be 3 "victims" at least. And I doubt they would be listed if they are not willing to testify. But I suspect there is a lot more that we may never know about, but hopefully puts at least some of these sick bastards away for a very long time.

  • Like (+1) 1
Posted
3 minutes ago, njbuff said:

 

Just grab the Webster's Dictionary you have that is holding up your coffee table. ?

 

Ha!!!!!!!!

Thanks for the help but I just asked my wife and she reminded me... ?

  • Like (+1) 1
Posted
Just now, Cinga said:

 

Ha!!!!!!!!

Thanks for the help but I just asked my wife and she reminded me... ?


You needed your wife?

 

Whatever happened to the mistress?

 

??

  • Haha (+1) 1
Posted
11 minutes ago, Winston Zeddemore said:

 

I'm not absolutely certain, as I'm still reading the indictment. Though, she was also referenced (unnamed) in Epstein's indictment from 2002-2005. The 94-97 period referenced in today's indictment is focused on her grooming/transporting of minors.

 

The timing of that is quite important for reasons that will become more clear down the road. 

 

 

...good points and thanks......more current stuff and witnesses willing to come forward would strengthen the case.......

  • Like (+1) 1
×
×
  • Create New...