Koko78 Posted December 20, 2019 Posted December 20, 2019 1 hour ago, DC Tom said: We don't indulge that sort of hate speech here. "Put them up against the wall," though, that's fine. Now hold on, does "learn to code" mean something different in Sweden?
DC Tom Posted December 21, 2019 Posted December 21, 2019 1 hour ago, Koko78 said: Now hold on, does "learn to code" mean something different in Sweden? https://thinkprogress.org/learn-to-code-decoded-the-campaign-against-laid-off-journalists-is-harassments-new-frontier-20725ddd480a/
fansince88 Posted December 21, 2019 Posted December 21, 2019 23 hours ago, Deranged Rhino said: Bye, Joe. I saw this and it absolutely blew my mind. Must see tv right there. Meanwhile the others were trying to figure out a way to outdo him. 1
/dev/null Posted December 21, 2019 Posted December 21, 2019 6 hours ago, B-Man said: December Democratic debate: A lot of winners and one clear cut loser New York Post, by Staff Original Article . Biggest winners of the Democrat debates thus far has been Donald Trump. The more the Democrats talk, the less bad Trump looks 3
row_33 Posted December 21, 2019 Posted December 21, 2019 (edited) They should have learned from Trump, loudly tell all your opponents that they all suck and are losers and they should all quit and go home now it worked Edited December 21, 2019 by row_33 1 1
B-Man Posted December 21, 2019 Author Posted December 21, 2019 ARE VOTERS TUNING OUT THE DEMOCRATS? Last night’s Democratic presidential debate had the lowest ratings of any of this year’s debates: According to Nielsen figures provided to Variety, the Los Angeles debate hosted by PBS NewsHour and Politico and simulcast on CNN drew just over 2 million viewers across PBS stations nationwide, and was seen on CNN by just over 4 million people. PBS told Variety that the debate live streams across the participating networks’ digital and social platforms totaled more than 8.4 million viewers. Those numbers are even worse than the ones for the fifth debate that was hosted by MSNBC. In contrast, 18.1 million tuned in to the Democrats’ first debate, in June. Six months later, the Democrats have lost most of their television audience. This doesn’t surprise me. With Marianne Williamson and Tulsi Gabbard gone, why would anyone watch? To see Bernie wave his arms, Elizabeth Warren hector viewers, Joe Biden stumble and fumble? I don’t blame viewers for tuning out. You can’t read too much into TV ratings, obviously, but there is an obvious lack of enthusiasm for the Democratic candidates. The fact that Slow Joe Biden, now apparently in his dotage, continues to lead the pack, tells you all you need to know. No wonder ratings are dropping. . 1 2
/dev/null Posted December 21, 2019 Posted December 21, 2019 4 hours ago, B-Man said: ARE VOTERS TUNING OUT THE DEMOCRATS? Last night’s Democratic presidential debate had the lowest ratings of any of this year’s debates: . Ratings for the debates were going to go down inevitably. When the debate process started, people were tired of Trump and tuned in to see the alternatives. But people have tuned out after a few Democrat debates reminded them why they voted for Trump 2 1
Just Joshin' Posted December 21, 2019 Posted December 21, 2019 19 hours ago, fansince88 said: I saw this and it absolutely blew my mind. Must see tv right there. Meanwhile the others were trying to figure out a way to outdo him. In Dr Evil voice....One Million Jobs. 1
row_33 Posted December 22, 2019 Posted December 22, 2019 Where did she get that up against the wall thing, from that song by Roger Waters on The Wall?
4merper4mer Posted December 22, 2019 Posted December 22, 2019 27 minutes ago, row_33 said: Where did she get that up against the wall thing, from that song by Roger Waters on The Wall? Who let all of this riff raff into the room? 1
row_33 Posted December 22, 2019 Posted December 22, 2019 2 hours ago, 4merper4mer said: Who let all of this riff raff into the room? lyrics stated every time the Dems elite get together in private
B-Man Posted January 8, 2020 Author Posted January 8, 2020 The Democrats set their criteria for qualifying for their debates, so it's absurd to criticize Mike Bloomberg for not participating. I'm reading "Democrats attack Bloomberg for running imperial campaign/The billionaire businessman says he's sticking to his principle of not accepting donations, and therefore not participating in debates" (Politico). I am getting the feeling that Politico is pro-Bloomberg, so I'm a bit skeptical about who, actually, is criticizing Bloomberg. But there are names attached to the criticism: “He is skipping the democracy part of this,” Elizabeth Warren told MSNBC’s Rachel Maddow on Monday night. Steyer, who raised small-dollar contributions to qualify for the debate but risks missing the January stage because of his low polling numbers, agreed. "Any person who wants to be president should be willing to debate their ideas in front of the American people and participate in the grassroots work of meeting and listening to voters in Iowa, New Hampshire, Nevada and South Carolina,” Steyer spokesman Benjamin Gerdes said.... Why doesn't Elizabeth Warren invite Bloomberg to debate her face-to-face? Is there some Democratic Party rule that blocks candidates from doing this? Put the 2 of them at a table with no moderator for 2 hours and stream it on YouTube (or wherever). .
B-Man Posted January 14, 2020 Author Posted January 14, 2020 TONIGHT: DEMS DUKE IT OUT IN DES MOINES... FINAL DEBATE BEFORE VOTE... POLL: BIDEN MOVES TO TOP IN IOWA... . 1
B-Man Posted January 14, 2020 Author Posted January 14, 2020 IN OTHER NEWS:.............................NO SHE CANNOT. . 3
KRC Posted January 14, 2020 Posted January 14, 2020 2 minutes ago, B-Man said: IN OTHER NEWS:.............................NO SHE CANNOT. . IMPEACH!!!
/dev/null Posted January 14, 2020 Posted January 14, 2020 15 minutes ago, B-Man said: IN OTHER NEWS:.............................NO SHE CANNOT. . Pen and a phone, amirite? 1
Recommended Posts