Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
6 hours ago, transplantbillsfan said:

 

I think you guys are so weird. 

 

Seems not many of you over here (except Tiberius and one or two others) are registered democrats.

 

THUS

 

You can't vote in the primaries and have no influence on the Democratic nominee.

 

Why the hell would you watch it the Democratic debate?

 

 (Please spare me the rote bullcrap response of having to educate yourself on both sides so you can make an informed decision when November 2020 comes)

 

What a waste of time for you folks.

 

I legitimately feel bad that some of you felt it was worthwhile to inevitably sit for 2 hours to watch something you had no influence over just for some LOLs when there were probably quicker ways to get them later.


Why do I watch the DNC debates? To stay informed. I prefer to form my own opinions on a topic, instead of listening to the talking heads and being told what to think.  It helps to be able to hold a conversation with someone, and I do not fall prey to group-think, and stupid soundbites. 


 

  • Like (+1) 5
  • Thank you (+1) 1
Posted
6 hours ago, transplantbillsfan said:

 

I think you guys are so weird. 

 

Seems not many of you over here (except Tiberius and one or two others) are registered democrats.

 

THUS

 

You can't vote in the primaries and have no influence on the Democratic nominee.

 

Why the hell would you watch it the Democratic debate?

 

Translation: Stop watching my family make massive asshats out of each other!

  • Like (+1) 1
Posted
6 hours ago, BeginnersMind said:

 

He will keep us safe from “the cyber. “

 

Trump and Biden talk about the Internet like the old guys they are. It’s funny. 


Well, you gotta admit,  Trump seems to have that twitter-thing down. 

  • Like (+1) 2
Posted
15 hours ago, jrober38 said:

Trump made no effort to include them his first two years because he didn't need them then.

 

That's not true, at all. The GOP did not have a filibuster-proof majority.

 

14 hours ago, Deranged Rhino said:

No one clapped after Tulsi's opener. (The fix is in)

 

The fix was in the first week of her campaign, when they started smearing her about her father's LGBTQRSTLNMVX positions.

  • Like (+1) 1
Posted
17 hours ago, row_33 said:

 

Reformed/Presbyterian and RC and Lutherans teach that the children of believers are part of a covenant of continuity. A sort of hedge over the child until it is ready down the road to embrace the faith 

 

Lutherans and RC teach infant baptism as regenerating, Ref/Presby doesn’t 

 

None of that makes you a Christian. It may prepare you, but you do not become a Christian directly as a result of those acts. 

 

17 hours ago, row_33 said:

US Evangelicals almost always require a personal decision and commitment, starting around the age of 12, with full immersion for Baptism.

 

You make it sound like Christianity is the same as buying a timeshare. "We need a decision and a commitment before you leave here today!"

 

Evangelicals don't require you to do anything to be a Christian because they can't make you a Christian. Only God can do that, and he requires your personal assistance. Without Googling it...are you aware of what God requires from you to be a Christian? Hint: it involves absolutely none of the things you've mentioned so far.

Posted

And I thought the overreaction to Morse was comedic gold.

 

These Demonrat debates are a laugh a minute.

 

That Williamson broad is totally off her rocker.

 

Its ok to think outside the box, but can you think within the universe?

Posted
17 minutes ago, njbuff said:

And I thought the overreaction to Morse was comedic gold.

 

These Demonrat debates are a laugh a minute.

 

That Williamson broad is totally off her rocker.

 

Its ok to think outside the box, but can you think within the universe?


Williamson is entertainment value now (she's a bit out there), but it becomes less funny if she actually catches on and becomes the nominee.  Being an author of some self-help books to president of the United States? Yikes. 

 

Posted (edited)
4 minutes ago, Buffalo_Gal said:


Williamson is entertainment value now (she's a bit out there), but it becomes less funny if she actually catches on and becomes the nominee.  Being an author of some self-help books to president of the United States? Yikes. 

 

 

Shes the Jack Torrance of politics.

 

Lets hope she doesn’t go after Trump with an axe.

Edited by njbuff
Posted
8 hours ago, transplantbillsfan said:

 

I think you guys are so weird. 

 

Seems not many of you over here (except Tiberius and one or two others) are registered democrats.

 

THUS

 

You can't vote in the primaries and have no influence on the Democratic nominee.

 

Why the hell would you watch it the Democratic debate?

 

 (Please spare me the rote bullcrap response of having to educate yourself on both sides so you can make an informed decision when November 2020 comes)

 

What a waste of time for you folks.

 

I legitimately feel bad that some of you felt it was worthwhile to inevitably sit for 2 hours to watch something you had no influence over just for some LOLs when there were probably quicker ways to get them later.

Lot of states (incl mine) allow you to vote in your choice of primary regardless of political affiliation 

  • Like (+1) 1
  • Thank you (+1) 2
Posted (edited)
57 minutes ago, Buffalo_Gal said:


Williamson is entertainment value now (she's a bit out there), but it becomes less funny if she actually catches on and becomes the nominee.  Being an author of some self-help books to president of the United States? Yikes. 

 

Remember , she officiated in Liz Taylor's marriage to her last hubby (the carpenter I think) and Micheal Jackson was the Best Man(?)

Edited by Wacka
Posted
1 hour ago, Buffalo_Gal said:


Well, you gotta admit,  Trump seems to have that twitter-thing down. 

 

He had mastered trolling. I see that as a negative but freely acknowledge it. 

Posted
8 hours ago, Doc Brown said:

The same reason I watched Ben Carson and Donald Trump in the first Republican debates.  Entertainment.  As somebody who will probably vote in the Democratic primary (a vote that actually counts as opposed to the presidential vote in NYS), I'm looking to see who the candidate is that can best take on Trump.  I'm really not sure at this point as there's too many damn candidates.

 

The one thing that struck me tonight was every candidate besides Biden was indirectly going after Obama's administration as being too right wing.  That's an insane strategy as Obama has a 90 plus approval rating with Democratic voters.  

 

All Biden has to do is hold ground and he's going to be the nominee. I've read people like @Deranged Rhino on here saying there's no way he's going to be the Democratic nominee and it just makes me scratch my head.

 

And yes, that strategy to attack Obama was a terrible one.

  • Like (+1) 1
Posted
5 hours ago, LBSeeBallLBGetBall said:

Good point. There's nothing worthwhile about watching a debate of ideas between people who could potentially be the next president. We should just wait for the spin machine to clean up what they said and tell us what to think like good little lemmings. You are literally the reason why home schooling is such an appealing idea for some.

 

Oh btw, have you conversed with any well spoken black people lately, racist?

 

 

 

Awwwww...

 

You mad bro?

obama_not_amused.gif

Posted
5 minutes ago, transplantbillsfan said:

 

 

 

 

I've read people like @Deranged Rhino on here saying there's no way he's going to be the Democratic nominee and it just makes me scratch my head.

.

 

 

I know that I have said it and I will happily say it again.

 

Today's Democrat majority will NEVER vote for a 77 year old (this Nov.) WHITE MALE.

 

Especially one with so much ammunition against him.

 

If I am wrong, then I will admit it, but I am very confident as I read more and more from our Left/Lib/Dem voters 

×
×
  • Create New...