Deranged Rhino Posted July 24, 2019 Share Posted July 24, 2019 Just now, jrober38 said: Mueller can't be anymore clear that he thinks Trump obstructed justice. Will be very interesting to see what happens once he's out of office. He could have been more clear in his report. Instead he punted. And RR and Barr ruled. It's over. No obstruction will be brought, now or after. That's why the focus on it by the left is so silly and a waste of time. ESPECIALLY when you look back at how this started. This didn't start with an accusation of obstruction. It started with accusations of TREASON. 3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tiberius Posted July 24, 2019 Author Share Posted July 24, 2019 The internet is against Trump now Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DC Tom Posted July 24, 2019 Share Posted July 24, 2019 Just now, jrober38 said: Mueller can't be anymore clear that he thinks Trump obstructed justice. It will be very interesting to see what happens once he's out of office. Yep, everyone has their preconceived notions confirmed by this hearing, but nothing changes. This is just a campaign stunt. 4 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Deranged Rhino Posted July 24, 2019 Share Posted July 24, 2019 Cicilline is trying his best to lie here... Mueller's investigation was not ended. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jrober38 Posted July 24, 2019 Share Posted July 24, 2019 (edited) 2 minutes ago, Deranged Rhino said: He could have been more clear in his report. Instead he punted. And RR and Barr ruled. It's over. No obstruction will be brought, now or after. That's why the focus on it by the left is so silly and a waste of time. ESPECIALLY when you look back at how this started. This didn't start with an accusation of obstruction. It started with accusations of TREASON. Doubtful. If it was over, they wouldn't be interviewing Mueller right now. Everything he's saying about obstruction was in the report. 1 minute ago, DC Tom said: Yep, everyone has their preconceived notions confirmed by this hearing, but nothing changes. This is just a campaign stunt. If I was Trump I'd be very worried. Mueller has said numerous times today that Trump can be charged once he's out of office. Edited July 24, 2019 by jrober38 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Buftex Posted July 24, 2019 Share Posted July 24, 2019 3 minutes ago, B-Man said: She's not wrong..................... Rep. @Jim_Jordan just rips the bark off Mueller: "You can charge 13 Russians, no one has ever heard of, you can charge all kinds of people around the president with false statements, but the guy who puts this whole story in motion, you can’t charge him?" . I guess everyone hears what they want to hear... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
plenzmd1 Posted July 24, 2019 Share Posted July 24, 2019 Whoever this is questioning is stupid...reads @Deranged Rhino twitter Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Deranged Rhino Posted July 24, 2019 Share Posted July 24, 2019 Just now, jrober38 said: Doubtful. If it was over, they wouldn't be interviewing Mueller right now. Everything he's saying about obstruction was in the report. He didn't make a conclusion on obstruction in the report -- so he could have been more clear, right? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Big Gun Posted July 24, 2019 Share Posted July 24, 2019 2 minutes ago, Tiberius said: The internet is against Trump now No it's not! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jrober38 Posted July 24, 2019 Share Posted July 24, 2019 Just now, Deranged Rhino said: He didn't make a conclusion on obstruction in the report -- so he could have been more clear, right? He clearly stated in the report that Trump may have obstructed justice around 12 times, that he can't indict a sitting President, and that if they felt Trump didn't commit any crimes they'd have said so. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
4merper4mer Posted July 24, 2019 Share Posted July 24, 2019 He didn't reach any conclusions in the report before he wrote the report? Time machine FTW. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SoCal Deek Posted July 24, 2019 Share Posted July 24, 2019 Having listened to it for about an hour the ONLY thing we’ve learned is that Mueller is old and clueless. Where do they find these people? I’d have fired his arse for his utter inability to have any idea what he’s doing at work on any given day! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Deranged Rhino Posted July 24, 2019 Share Posted July 24, 2019 1 minute ago, jrober38 said: He clearly stated in the report that Trump may have obstructed justice around 12 times, that he can't indict a sitting President, and that if they felt Trump didn't commit any crimes they'd have said so. That's not how it works. Which is the point. That answer is a punt, not a real answer from a SCO. Which is why it's over. Barr and RR ruled already. It's done. Anyone saying it's not is lying to you. Like they lied to you about Russia working with Trump to steal the election for the last three years. Sooner or later you have to stop believing the words of proven liars. 3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
B-Man Posted July 24, 2019 Share Posted July 24, 2019 1 minute ago, Buftex said: I guess everyone hears what they want to hear... Or, like an adult, you could actually listen to the questions and answers. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DC Tom Posted July 24, 2019 Share Posted July 24, 2019 3 minutes ago, jrober38 said: If I was Trump I'd be very worried. Mueller has said numerous times today that Trump can be charged once he's out of office. He can't even be impeached for it now. And you're only hearing what you want to hear. There's no evidence of obstruction, just vague feelings and interpretations of conflicting opinions. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Deranged Rhino Posted July 24, 2019 Share Posted July 24, 2019 Here comes Swalwell! Can't wait to see how this guy ***** this up. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
plenzmd1 Posted July 24, 2019 Share Posted July 24, 2019 18 minutes ago, Deranged Rhino said: Give me a better answer. They charged everyone else who lied to them (and even some who didn't lie). But they didn't charge Mifsud -- because doing so would expose him to discovery and cross, which would expose him as a western intelligence asset, not a Russian asset as Mueller's report claims. As McCabe claimed. As Comey claimed. This is just like Nader. They had his laptop. Knew there was CP on it, yet they didn't charge him because they wanted his testimony for the report... Truly you are speculating on the reason..do you disagree it is speculation? Pretty simple i think??? 14 minutes ago, Deranged Rhino said: ... Because for 3 years people like Nadler and Swalell and Jeffries have told the American public that Trump was a traitor and they had evidence. Mueller would prove it. yet now, crickets. I dont think anyone is wondering whether the president would be charged with collusion if not the president, he would not. However there is plenty of question if he would be charged with obstruction if not the president..so that's the focus..as it should be Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dubs Posted July 24, 2019 Share Posted July 24, 2019 (edited) 11 minutes ago, jrober38 said: Doubtful. If it was over, they wouldn't be interviewing Mueller right now. Everything he's saying about obstruction was in the report. If I was Trump I'd be very worried. Mueller has said numerous times today that Trump can be charged once he's out of office. Guess they will have to wait for 2024 for that and I’m sure Nikki Haley or Mike Pence will give Trump a gentleman’s pardon. Edited July 24, 2019 by dubs Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SoCal Deek Posted July 24, 2019 Share Posted July 24, 2019 Trump wants to fire Mueller but his attorney tells him it would be construed as obstruction...so Trump DOESN’T FIRE HIM! Where’s the story here? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DC Tom Posted July 24, 2019 Share Posted July 24, 2019 4 minutes ago, jrober38 said: He clearly stated in the report that Trump may have obstructed justice around 12 times, that he can't indict a sitting President, and that if they felt Trump didn't commit any crimes they'd have said so. "[C]learly stated Trump may have..." Do you even understand how stupid that sounds? How do you indict on 12 counts of "may have obstructed?" 3 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts