Deranged Rhino Posted July 24, 2019 Posted July 24, 2019 Gohmert gets Mueller to (basically) admit he didn't write his statement. Just now, jrober38 said: They've already established that Trump didn't collude with Russia. The issue at this point is volume 2, where Trump appears to have tried to obstruct justice multiple times. No. No. No. That's wrong on every count. If they established that, which they did, then Fusion GPS becomes even MORE important to understand, especially for the SCO since they were the source of the entire conspiracy narrative.
Doc Posted July 24, 2019 Posted July 24, 2019 47 minutes ago, Deranged Rhino said: "At any time was your investigation curtailed or stopped?" Mueller: "No." (No obstruction) 54 minutes ago, jrober38 said: To summarize his opening statement. 1. The Russians systematically interfered with the election. 2. The Trump campaign did not collude with the Russians. 3. The Trump White House may have obstructed justice. It's on Congress to establish that conclusively. Thats all folks. 1
jrober38 Posted July 24, 2019 Posted July 24, 2019 3 minutes ago, Deranged Rhino said: Gohmert gets Mueller to (basically) admit he didn't write his statement. No. No. No. That's wrong on every count. If they established that, which they did, then Fusion GPS becomes even MORE important to understand, especially for the SCO since they were the source of the entire conspiracy narrative. Obstruction of justice is certainly the issue at this point.
keepthefaith Posted July 24, 2019 Posted July 24, 2019 Mueller strikes me as a man whose better days are well behind him. He's a doddering old man. 2
Deranged Rhino Posted July 24, 2019 Posted July 24, 2019 1 minute ago, jrober38 said: Obstruction of justice is certainly the issue at this point. You're dodging now. The original charge was conspiracy -- which Mueller was tasked with investigating. He wrote an entire volume on it. Yet, despite this, he's "unfamiliar" with Fusion GPS -- the SOURCE of all the information discussed in Volume 1. That makes sense to you? That's an acceptable answer? 1 2
jrober38 Posted July 24, 2019 Posted July 24, 2019 2 minutes ago, keepthefaith said: Mueller strikes me as a man whose better days are well behind him. I think that's the case for every 75 year old man.
Big Gun Posted July 24, 2019 Posted July 24, 2019 2 minutes ago, keepthefaith said: Mueller strikes me as a man whose better days are well behind him. He's a doddering old man. He also seems a bit nervous to me, like he is hiding something.
Deranged Rhino Posted July 24, 2019 Posted July 24, 2019 Deutch is literally asking WHY Trump wanted to fire Mueller... but he didn't fire Mueller. Mueller said himself he wasn't obstructed or impeded at all. THIS is their big smoking gun. Talking about something that DID NOT HAPPEN. While ignoring, like jrober is, what started this whole thing. Ask yourself if that's the act of honest politicians interested in truth, or if they're blind partisans.
keepthefaith Posted July 24, 2019 Posted July 24, 2019 1 minute ago, jrober38 said: I think that's the case for every 75 year old man. It really is a swamp in Washington with the same cast of characters constantly recycled until they're dead. 3
Whatnot78 Posted July 24, 2019 Posted July 24, 2019 1 minute ago, keepthefaith said: It really is a swamp in Washington with the same cast of characters constantly recycled until they're dead. Term limits would solve some of the issues 2 1
GG Posted July 24, 2019 Posted July 24, 2019 5 minutes ago, Deranged Rhino said: You're dodging now. The original charge was conspiracy -- which Mueller was tasked with investigating. He wrote an entire volume on it. Yet, despite this, he's "unfamiliar" with Fusion GPS -- the SOURCE of all the information discussed in Volume 1. That makes sense to you? That's an acceptable answer? How can Strzok be in scope but Simpson not?
jrober38 Posted July 24, 2019 Posted July 24, 2019 (edited) 8 minutes ago, Deranged Rhino said: You're dodging now. The original charge was conspiracy -- which Mueller was tasked with investigating. He wrote an entire volume on it. Yet, despite this, he's "unfamiliar" with Fusion GPS -- the SOURCE of all the information discussed in Volume 1. That makes sense to you? That's an acceptable answer? You're acting like Mueller was an active part of the FBI during the 2016 election cycle. There was never any charge. It's only ever been an investigation. Michael Flynn was linked to Russians in early 2017, and subsequently resigned. Jeff Sessions recused himself on March 2nd, and from there the cries for an investigation into the Trump campaign began and in May of 2017, Robert Mueller was named Special Counsel to investigate Russian Interference and potential ties between the Trump Campaign and Russia. I 100% agree with you that there should be an investigation into Fusion GPS, but I don't see how Robert Mueller's mandate would have anything to do with it. Edited July 24, 2019 by jrober38
Deranged Rhino Posted July 24, 2019 Posted July 24, 2019 Just now, GG said: How can Strzok be in scope but Simpson not? Agreed. It's nonsense/exposing the partisan nature of the entire ordeal from the start.
4merper4mer Posted July 24, 2019 Posted July 24, 2019 14 minutes ago, Deranged Rhino said: Gohmert gets Mueller to (basically) admit he didn't write his statement. No. No. No. That's wrong on every count. If they established that, which they did, then Fusion GPS becomes even MORE important to understand, especially for the SCO since they were the source of the entire conspiracy narrative. They are not interested in publishing all of the truth. Their task was Get Trump. 1
jrober38 Posted July 24, 2019 Posted July 24, 2019 5 minutes ago, Deranged Rhino said: Deutch is literally asking WHY Trump wanted to fire Mueller... but he didn't fire Mueller. Mueller said himself he wasn't obstructed or impeded at all. THIS is their big smoking gun. Talking about something that DID NOT HAPPEN. While ignoring, like jrober is, what started this whole thing. Ask yourself if that's the act of honest politicians interested in truth, or if they're blind partisans. I'm not dodging anything. I'd love for there to be an investigation into how the "links" between Russia and Trump began. 2 minutes ago, GG said: How can Strzok be in scope but Simpson not? Because Strzok literally worked for Mueller.
Deranged Rhino Posted July 24, 2019 Posted July 24, 2019 Just now, jrober38 said: You're acting like Mueller was an active part of the FBI during the 2016 election cycle. His job was to look into this very question, and he had the entire toolkit of the FBI at his disposal. Again, you're dodging. 1 minute ago, jrober38 said: There was never any charge. Michael Flynn was linked to Russians in early 2017, and subsequently resigned. Flynn was NOT linked to Russia. This is inaccurate. 1 minute ago, jrober38 said: I 100% agree with you that there should be an investigation into Fusion GPS, but I don't see how Robert Mueller's mandate would have anything to do with it. It was literally his tasking. 1
Tiberius Posted July 24, 2019 Author Posted July 24, 2019 Ordering an aid to lie, make a fake record and pressuring a subordinate to lie is ten times worse than what Clinton did. Thats big time obstruction of justice.
LB3 Posted July 24, 2019 Posted July 24, 2019 Just now, Tiberius said: Ordering an aid to lie, make a fake record and pressuring a subordinate to lie is ten times worse than what Clinton did. Thats big time obstruction of justice. Hmmmm...I think murder is worse, but to each their own.
Tiberius Posted July 24, 2019 Author Posted July 24, 2019 Oh boy, the blind guy Jordan. He watches young people getting sexually abused and says nothing. F u Jordan you corrupt scum bag
Deranged Rhino Posted July 24, 2019 Posted July 24, 2019 There was no obstruction of justice, per the AG and DAG. It's over. This is for show, not dough. Jodan asks why Mifsud wasn't charged with lying -- and Mueller says he can't get into it. WHAT? 1 1
Recommended Posts