Deranged Rhino Posted July 24, 2019 Posted July 24, 2019 1 minute ago, jrober38 said: Yikes. Mueller says Trump can be indicted for Obstruction of Justice after he leaves the White House. He won't be. "At any time was your investigation curtailed or stopped?" Mueller: "No." (No obstruction)
jrober38 Posted July 24, 2019 Posted July 24, 2019 Just now, Deranged Rhino said: He won't be. Debatable. I feel it's pretty likely there are a ton of people in the Democrat Party would love to see him on trial.
Deranged Rhino Posted July 24, 2019 Posted July 24, 2019 Collins: "Is it true the evidence gathered during your investigation did not establish that the president was involved in the underline crime of Russian interference." Mueller: "Yes."
Whatnot78 Posted July 24, 2019 Posted July 24, 2019 1 minute ago, jrober38 said: Debatable. I feel it's pretty likely there are a ton of people in the Democrat Party would love to see him on trial. Hence why we have this testimony today and the topic will continue throughout his presidency
Deranged Rhino Posted July 24, 2019 Posted July 24, 2019 Collins has him on collusion/conspiracy... Collins is thundering after Mueller now on collusion/conspiracy. Mueller says the report is right -- which means collusion/conspiracy are synonymous.
LB3 Posted July 24, 2019 Posted July 24, 2019 3 minutes ago, Tiberius said: Insufficient evidence? I love Wikileaks 2
jrober38 Posted July 24, 2019 Posted July 24, 2019 1 minute ago, Whatnot78 said: Hence why we have this testimony today and the topic will continue throughout his presidency Exactly. If Trump loses in 2020 I think it's easy to see him on trial pretty quickly following the transition of power. Major power players will push for that.
Tiberius Posted July 24, 2019 Author Posted July 24, 2019 That sure sounds like a conspiracy! They were working together, how is that not conspiracy???
GG Posted July 24, 2019 Posted July 24, 2019 Just now, Deranged Rhino said: Collins has him on collusion/conspiracy... Collins is thundering after Mueller now on collusion/conspiracy. Mueller says the report is right -- which means collusion/conspiracy are synonymous. That was after he said that collusion is not a colloquialism for conspiracy. Wonder how many outlets will claim that he perjured himself? 3
Deranged Rhino Posted July 24, 2019 Posted July 24, 2019 Just now, jrober38 said: Exactly. If Trump loses in 2020 I think it's easy to see him on trial pretty quickly following the transition of power. Major power players will push for that. And you think this would be a good thing? Or a bad thing. If that's the case, Obama better be on his toes considering there's actual evidence he broke nearly every oath he took when he led an illegal spying operation out of his DOJ. One designed to spy on his political opponents. The peaceful transition of power used to mean something...
Tiberius Posted July 24, 2019 Author Posted July 24, 2019 126 contacts between Russians and Trump campaign. Hmmmmm.....
jrober38 Posted July 24, 2019 Posted July 24, 2019 Just now, Deranged Rhino said: And you think this would be a good thing? Or a bad thing. If that's the case, Obama better be on his toes considering there's actual evidence he broke nearly every oath he took when he led an illegal spying operation out of his DOJ. One designed to spy on his political opponents. The peaceful transition of power used to mean something... I think it would be a bad thing. No one should use the Justice Department as a weapon. If the Dems are going to do anything, it needs to be via an impeachment process.
Deranged Rhino Posted July 24, 2019 Posted July 24, 2019 "126 contacts between Russians and the Trump campaign" ... she's hitting this after we've established that none of those contacts crossed the line to conspiracy/collusion. This is all a show, folks. They're playing games because they got caught lying about a Russian conspiracy. Just now, jrober38 said: I think it would be a bad thing. No one should use the Justice Department as a weapon. If the Dems are going to do anything, it needs to be via an impeachment process. And yet, that's exactly what 44 did. And how we got to this point.
Tiberius Posted July 24, 2019 Author Posted July 24, 2019 Sharing polling data, accepting Russian help and spreading Russian propaganda, ya, nothing to see here Stolen election
jrober38 Posted July 24, 2019 Posted July 24, 2019 1 minute ago, Deranged Rhino said: "126 contacts between Russians and the Trump campaign" ... she's hitting this after we've established that none of those contacts crossed the line to conspiracy/collusion. This is all a show, folks. They're playing games because they got caught lying about a Russian conspiracy. And yet, that's exactly what 44 did. And how we got to this point. There's zero evidence whatsoever that Obama had anything to do with that. With that said, the players who were involved were way out of line and should probably on trial for committing crimes. I agree with you there. 1
Deranged Rhino Posted July 24, 2019 Posted July 24, 2019 "Which DOJ policy or principle sets forth a legal standard that an investigated person is NOT exonerated if their innocence from criminal conduct is not conclusively determined. Where does that policy come from?" Ratcliffe (It doesn't exist -- his job was not to exonerate Trump) 1
Whatnot78 Posted July 24, 2019 Posted July 24, 2019 1 minute ago, Deranged Rhino said: "126 contacts between Russians and the Trump campaign" ... she's hitting this after we've established that none of those contacts crossed the line to conspiracy/collusion. This is all a show, folks. They're playing games because they got caught lying about a Russian conspiracy. And yet, that's exactly what 44 did. And how we got to this point. I wonder if that will even come to light. IMO, no big to-do will come of it because it will severely hinder any faith in our intelligence community, both nationally and internationally. A couple of lowe-level people will fall on the sword and that's all we will hear of it. Then there will be internal changes...
Recommended Posts