Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
Just now, 3rdnlng said:

The illegality here was not accepting dirt or hiring someone to dig up dirt. It was misrepresenting the dug up dirt as being vetted and using it as the basis to get a warrant and using law enforcement against an opposing campaign.

 

(and paying for foreign intelligence services to provide said dirt -- which is illegal for the purposes of subverting a sitting president)

Posted (edited)
2 minutes ago, plenzmd1 said:

 

 

This might be the best takeaway. 

 

 

 

The Republicans should probably let Quigly use all their time... 

Edited by whatdrought
Posted
12 minutes ago, jrober38 said:

 

Then why haven't they been charged?

 

Trump said it himself - people pay for political dirt all the time, which is true.

 

For whatever reason, if you seek out the dirt, it's legal , but if a foreign government brings you something on their own, it's illegal.

 

Clinton hasn't been charged, so she's not guilty.

 

Trump hasn't been charged, so...?  

  • Like (+1) 1
  • Thank you (+1) 1
Posted
3 minutes ago, DC Tom said:

 

Clinton hasn't been charged, so she's not guilty.

 

Trump hasn't been charged, so...?  

 

Woah Woah woah... Don't question assumptions now... Obviously we can assume that if Clinton were guilty she'd be charge, but that Trump hasn't been charged because he's obstructing justice... I mean, that's just simple assumptions, which we know are true. 

Posted (edited)

I got out of a meeting in time to catch the last 15 minutes before the current break. It's getting tough to listen to Mueller struggle.

giphy.gif

Edited by LBSeeBallLBGetBall
  • Like (+1) 1
  • Sad 1
  • Haha (+1) 4
Posted
1 minute ago, LBSeeBallLBGetBall said:

I got out of meeting in time to catch the last 15 minutes before the current break. It's getting tough to listen to Mueller struggle.

giphy.gif

 

Image result for if he dies he dies gif

  • Like (+1) 2
  • Haha (+1) 2
Posted
20 minutes ago, Deranged Rhino said:

 

You're 100% wrong on where the dirt came from, how it was obtained, why it obtained in that matter and how it fits the exact definition of collusion/conspiracy the left has been trying to sink Trump with for three years.

 

Feel free to enlighten me then.

  • Thank you (+1) 1
Posted (edited)
9 minutes ago, DC Tom said:

 

Clinton hasn't been charged, so she's not guilty.

 

Trump hasn't been charged, so...?  

 

Trump can't be charged while he's President unless Congress impeaches him.

 

Impeachment is very unpopular in the polls, which is why I think they'll wait until he's no longer President to go after him (I don't agree with this at all, just what I think they'll do). 

Edited by jrober38
Posted
2 minutes ago, jrober38 said:

 

Trump can't be charged.

Quit your horseshit. I haven't been responding to you because you are "one of those posters". You subtly twist things and draw people into a long discussion with statements like the above. We know Trump can't be charged as a sitting president. If Mueller thought he was guilty of something there was nothing against him coming right out and saying so.

  • Thank you (+1) 1
Posted (edited)
1 minute ago, Tiberius said:

Republicans are not questioning any of Muellers basic conclusions. They are just trying to raise red Harings 

 

How so? 

 

What conclussions do you want them to ask about, and what red harings are they throwing? 

Edited by whatdrought
×
×
  • Create New...