Deranged Rhino Posted July 24, 2019 Posted July 24, 2019 Just now, jrober38 said: Why would the law change just do to the severity of the charge? The law is the law. Mueller has been incredibly clear. They cannot say Trump committed crimes, because they cannot indict him while he's President. So you're saying if Mueller discovered proof that Trump was a traitor, he couldn't do anything about it until he served out his term? Come on. You're being fed bull by people who think you're too stupid to think for yourself.
plenzmd1 Posted July 24, 2019 Posted July 24, 2019 Just now, Deranged Rhino said: They're key players in the Russian narrative. Denying they are is fantasy. maybe i misheard..that line of questioning did not go there
jrober38 Posted July 24, 2019 Posted July 24, 2019 (edited) 1 minute ago, Deranged Rhino said: So you're saying if Mueller discovered proof that Trump was a traitor, he couldn't do anything about it until he served out his term? Come on. You're being fed bull by people who think you're too stupid to think for yourself. Correct. At that point it would still be on Congress to impeach him. The law doesn't change just because of the charge. Getting rid of a President is Congress' job. Edited July 24, 2019 by jrober38 1
plenzmd1 Posted July 24, 2019 Posted July 24, 2019 Just now, Deranged Rhino said: So you're saying if Mueller discovered proof that Trump was a traitor, he couldn't do anything about it until he served out his term? Come on. You're being fed bull by people who think you're too stupid to think for yourself. Thats what Trumps attorney taold us... https://www.huffpost.com/entry/the-morning-email-giuliani-trump-cant-be-indicted-shooting-comey_n_5b151797e4b02143b7ce0d58?guccounter=1&guce_referrer=aHR0cHM6Ly93d3cuZ29vZ2xlLmNvbS8&guce_referrer_sig=AQAAAEnWV91LabJ9QsT0znv3L0eeidzjZTMlgXErHqa5wRNXTcj2-i-FB49n3xYvhiFOfPKm0Kc7MGD2OBubv9h7T7wvGE0BCjRKhxUamZcujqc7KBRYTcMDxRQbTxe-qmLjy9V3O0FQkqu2vBUhPenAqmiAvjArlIno_IYpADMogf6L
jrober38 Posted July 24, 2019 Posted July 24, 2019 Just now, Deranged Rhino said: Ridiculous. The only way to get rid of a President is to impeach them. That's literally the law.
Deranged Rhino Posted July 24, 2019 Posted July 24, 2019 Just now, jrober38 said: The only way to get rid of a President is to impeach them. That's literally the law. Had they found evidence -- no one would be hiding behind the SCO law. No one. Not Mueller. This only became a thing for Vol 2 for a reason. You're being conned.
Prickly Pete Posted July 24, 2019 Posted July 24, 2019 4 minutes ago, Deranged Rhino said: So you're saying if Mueller discovered proof that Trump was a traitor, he couldn't do anything about it until he served out his term? Come on. You're being fed bull by people who think you're too stupid to think for yourself. No, he's an idiot.
whatdrought Posted July 24, 2019 Posted July 24, 2019 Well, we officially have the opinion of this little #######. 1
B-Man Posted July 24, 2019 Posted July 24, 2019 Mueller continues to testify............... Mueller won’t read anything from the report out loud. ? . 1
Deranged Rhino Posted July 24, 2019 Posted July 24, 2019 Now votes being changed was outside Mueller's RUSSIAN INTERFERENCE PROBE'S purview 3
Buftex Posted July 24, 2019 Posted July 24, 2019 Demings: "Lies by Trump campaign officials and administration officials impeded your investigation." Mueller: "I would generally agree with that."
whatdrought Posted July 24, 2019 Posted July 24, 2019 2 hours ago, jrober38 said: I'm very familiar with what I assume is in there, but save me the time of reading the whole thing. What pages mention Obama? I'm playing catch up on this thread, but I just wanted to drop a line and say What the Literal hell? Come. On. You have to see how stupid that sounds. 5
B-Man Posted July 24, 2019 Posted July 24, 2019 Biggs asking million dollar question: When did you reach conclusion? And the answer was? Mueller refused to answer. David Axelrod tweet: “This is delicate to say, but Mueller, whom I deeply respect, has not publicly testified before Congress in at least six years. And he does not appear as sharp as he was then.” 1
Deranged Rhino Posted July 24, 2019 Posted July 24, 2019 Now they're back to trying to conflate WikiLeaks with Russian intelligence. WikiLeaks does NOT = Russian intelligence. Never has. They think we're stupid.
LB3 Posted July 24, 2019 Posted July 24, 2019 Weird that he can't answer any questions that expose the Russia probe for what it was. 3
Deranged Rhino Posted July 24, 2019 Posted July 24, 2019 Just now, LBSeeBallLBGetBall said: Weird that he can't answer any questions that expose the Russia probe for what it was. Funny how that works, isn't it?
LB3 Posted July 24, 2019 Posted July 24, 2019 Just now, Deranged Rhino said: They think we're stupid. Based on Twitter and some of the responses in this thread...we are. 1
Deranged Rhino Posted July 24, 2019 Posted July 24, 2019 Mueller: "We strove to hire those individuals who could do the job." That job was TO FRAME THE PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR PARTISAN PURPOSES.
Recommended Posts