Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
  On 7/24/2019 at 6:07 PM, 3rdnlng said:

The illegality here was not accepting dirt or hiring someone to dig up dirt. It was misrepresenting the dug up dirt as being vetted and using it as the basis to get a warrant and using law enforcement against an opposing campaign.

Expand  

 

(and paying for foreign intelligence services to provide said dirt -- which is illegal for the purposes of subverting a sitting president)

Posted
  On 7/24/2019 at 6:02 PM, jrober38 said:

 

Then why haven't they been charged?

 

Trump said it himself - people pay for political dirt all the time, which is true.

 

For whatever reason, if you seek out the dirt, it's legal , but if a foreign government brings you something on their own, it's illegal.

Expand  

 

Clinton hasn't been charged, so she's not guilty.

 

Trump hasn't been charged, so...?  

  • Like (+1) 1
  • Thank you (+1) 1
Posted
  On 7/24/2019 at 6:15 PM, DC Tom said:

 

Clinton hasn't been charged, so she's not guilty.

 

Trump hasn't been charged, so...?  

Expand  

 

Woah Woah woah... Don't question assumptions now... Obviously we can assume that if Clinton were guilty she'd be charge, but that Trump hasn't been charged because he's obstructing justice... I mean, that's just simple assumptions, which we know are true. 

Posted (edited)

I got out of a meeting in time to catch the last 15 minutes before the current break. It's getting tough to listen to Mueller struggle.

giphy.gif

Edited by LBSeeBallLBGetBall
  • Like (+1) 1
  • Sad 1
  • Haha (+1) 4
Posted
  On 7/24/2019 at 6:04 PM, Deranged Rhino said:

 

You're 100% wrong on where the dirt came from, how it was obtained, why it obtained in that matter and how it fits the exact definition of collusion/conspiracy the left has been trying to sink Trump with for three years.

Expand  

 

Feel free to enlighten me then.

  • Thank you (+1) 1
Posted (edited)
  On 7/24/2019 at 6:15 PM, DC Tom said:

 

Clinton hasn't been charged, so she's not guilty.

 

Trump hasn't been charged, so...?  

Expand  

 

Trump can't be charged while he's President unless Congress impeaches him.

 

Impeachment is very unpopular in the polls, which is why I think they'll wait until he's no longer President to go after him (I don't agree with this at all, just what I think they'll do). 

Edited by jrober38
Posted
  On 7/24/2019 at 6:25 PM, jrober38 said:

 

Feel free to enlighten me then.

Expand  

 

I'm not trying to be snippy -- just a lot happening all at once. 

 

When this dies down I will -- but start by reading that document I shared which you said you already knew about but didn't. 

 

https://www.dni.gov/files/documents/icotr/51117/2016_Cert_FISC_Memo_Opin_Order_Apr_2017.pdf

Page 82-85 specifically.

  • Like (+1) 1
Posted
  On 7/24/2019 at 6:25 PM, jrober38 said:

 

Trump can't be charged.

Expand  

Quit your horseshit. I haven't been responding to you because you are "one of those posters". You subtly twist things and draw people into a long discussion with statements like the above. We know Trump can't be charged as a sitting president. If Mueller thought he was guilty of something there was nothing against him coming right out and saying so.

  • Thank you (+1) 1
Posted (edited)
  On 7/24/2019 at 6:35 PM, Tiberius said:

Republicans are not questioning any of Muellers basic conclusions. They are just trying to raise red Harings 

Expand  

 

How so? 

 

What conclussions do you want them to ask about, and what red harings are they throwing? 

Edited by whatdrought
×
×
  • Create New...