Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
Just now, Limeaid said:

I heard OJ wants Howard kicked off so feeling is mutual.  

 

 

....let's bring back Don Imus so Howard has a fellow polluter.....maybe even Artie.......

Posted

Following Tim Graham on twitter, he seems like he was mentioned here?  I thought he was actually on the show, but I guess not.  

Posted

I love Howard and can’t  say enough great things about what he has done in his career BUT... it seems a tad bit hypocritical of him to want to silence anyone considering the years he spent playing the free speech card when he was getting harassed by the FCC.

  • Like (+1) 4
Posted
1 hour ago, Leonhart2017 said:

I love Howard and can’t  say enough great things about what he has done in his career BUT... it seems a tad bit hypocritical of him to want to silence anyone considering the years he spent playing the free speech card when he was getting harassed by the FCC.

 

Twitter is a private company and can do whatever they want. Especially to a murderer and convicted criminal. There are plenty of people who have been banned from Twitter.

 

The FCC is a government entity, and the Government can NOT infringe on free speech. Especially when it's just fart and dick jokes.

 

Two completely different situations.

  • Like (+1) 3
Posted
1 hour ago, Leonhart2017 said:

I love Howard and can’t  say enough great things about what he has done in his career BUT... it seems a tad bit hypocritical of him to want to silence anyone considering the years he spent playing the free speech card when he was getting harassed by the FCC.

Bingo

Posted
20 minutes ago, DrDawkinstein said:

 

Twitter is a private company and can do whatever they want. Especially to a murderer and convicted criminal. There are plenty of people who have been banned from Twitter.

 

The FCC is a government entity, and the Government can NOT infringe on free speech. Especially when it's just fart and dick jokes.

 

Two completely different situations.

I am actually not saying Twitter has to allow any user on their private platform. My point (and I hate to even get into this because I love Howard) is that it is a bit hypocritical of Howard Stern to use the philosophy of free speech when it is to his advantage but then want someone else silenced. He has given a platform to people like the Westboro Baptist church as well as an evil racist like Daniel Carver so it does go beyond just sophomoric humor. 

  • Like (+1) 1
Posted
27 minutes ago, DrDawkinstein said:

 

Twitter is a private company and can do whatever they want. Especially to a murderer and convicted criminal. There are plenty of people who have been banned from Twitter.

 

The FCC is a government entity, and the Government can NOT infringe on free speech. Especially when it's just fart and dick jokes.

 

Two completely different situations.

Free speech is free speech, on any platform. Across any playing field you put it on.

  • Like (+1) 1
Posted
59 minutes ago, BillsFan17 said:

Free speech is free speech, on any platform. Across any playing field you put it on.

No, it's really not.

You don't have the right to say whatever you want, and you certainly don't have the right to do it without consequences. You just have the right not to be imprissioned or sanctioned by the government for it.

  • Like (+1) 1
Posted
3 hours ago, Leonhart2017 said:

I love Howard and can’t  say enough great things about what he has done in his career BUT... it seems a tad bit hypocritical of him to want to silence anyone considering the years he spent playing the free speech card when he was getting harassed by the FCC.

1,000% this

 

I listen to Howard everyday. I consider myself a huge fan but agree. CLEARLY, Howard hates OJ (and that’s fine). It’s tough for him to talk about silencing anyone though. He has made a career on free speech.

Posted (edited)

My heart goes out to the Goodman’s.  Howard is not funny anymore. He & O.J need to just go away.

Edited by ALLEN1QB
  • Like (+1) 1
Posted
49 minutes ago, BullBuchanan said:

No, it's really not.

You don't have the right to say whatever you want, and you certainly don't have the right to do it without consequences. You just have the right not to be imprissioned or sanctioned by the government for it.

I think the term "free" is lost on you.

Posted
8 minutes ago, BillsFan17 said:

I think the term "free" is lost on you.

I think the understanding of the meaning of the First Amendment is lost on you.

Posted
5 minutes ago, klos63 said:

I think the understanding of the meaning of the First Amendment is lost on you.

Nah, I have a firm grasp of it.

 

Remind me in the first amendment where it discusses Twitter terms and services.

Posted
1 minute ago, BillsFan17 said:

Nah, I have a firm grasp of it.

 

Remind me in the first amendment where it discusses Twitter terms and services.

If you really had a firm grasp of the 1st Amendment,  you wouldn't have written the 2nd sentence.

  • Like (+1) 1
Posted
Just now, klos63 said:

If you really had a firm grasp of the 1st Amendment,  you wouldn't have written the 2nd sentence.

So, what you are saying is, it's not in the first amendment? Gotcha 

×
×
  • Create New...