YoloinOhio Posted June 28, 2019 Posted June 28, 2019 I had to double check that this tweet is from 2019. Sure enough, it was today. 1
stony Posted June 28, 2019 Posted June 28, 2019 I have a limited understanding of how to build a roster, but I'm keeping him even if he is the 4th option. That seems like a good thing? 10 1 1 1
YoloinOhio Posted June 28, 2019 Author Posted June 28, 2019 Just now, stony said: I have a limited understanding of how to build a roster, but I'm keeping him even if he is the 4th option. That seems like a good thing? It’s a wild take ... isnt this the analyst who is on WGR all the time?
CaptnCoke11 Posted June 28, 2019 Posted June 28, 2019 (edited) Wow that’s pretty horrible. He might very well be our best WR.. If he continues to improve he’ll be our #1 Edited June 28, 2019 by CaptnCoke11 3
buffaloboyinATL Posted June 28, 2019 Posted June 28, 2019 Damn, I haven't really thought of it that way. I just assumed we would get them all on the field as often as possible. I really like Foster and hope this is not he case.
Chris from Rochester Posted June 28, 2019 Posted June 28, 2019 Even if he is the 4th best, he's on a super cheap rookie deal right now. Develop him! This is an awful take 27 1
CommonCents Posted June 28, 2019 Posted June 28, 2019 It’s a troll take no one believes that BS. Got me. I clicked on his Twitter. Scrolled for a minute, he has a selfie in a Lebron Jersey and is talking about shaving his head and coloring his hair. Wheeeeeeeeeee 5
Buffalo Junction Posted June 28, 2019 Posted June 28, 2019 That’s like saying you’d ditch a Rolex you found on the beach for a Sieko you bought for $1,000. 1 3 2
YoloinOhio Posted June 28, 2019 Author Posted June 28, 2019 (edited) Reading through the replies (he’s apparently blocking people who call him out), he’s saying that what matters most isn’t his talent, but the investment that was made in comparison to the other 3. Since it was comparably much lower, he feels they could get a decent return and still have 3 starting caliber WRs. what he’s missing is that their investment in Josh Allen (and therefore putting the players around him that will make him most successful, Foster being one who has proven that already) far exceeds what their investment is in any of those 3 WRs Edited June 28, 2019 by YoloinOhio 6
Gugny Posted June 28, 2019 Posted June 28, 2019 I would never trust anything I read from someone who looks like this .... 5 19 4
C.Biscuit97 Posted June 28, 2019 Posted June 28, 2019 I mean he would have to be horrible to get cut but he wasn’t that far off from being useless at Bama and getting cut last camp (and no other team trying to trade for him). He has all the skills but he is far from a sure thing. But he is super cheap. 1
Cripple Creek Posted June 28, 2019 Posted June 28, 2019 1 minute ago, Buffalo Junction said: That’s like saying you’d ditch a Rolex you found on the beach for a Sieko you bought for $1,000. Sieko watches cost $1,000?
freddyjj Posted June 28, 2019 Posted June 28, 2019 2 minutes ago, Gugny said: I would never trust anything I read from someone who looks like this .... and is named for a Crayola Crayon color - which they also misspelled 5
1st Ammendment NoMas Posted June 28, 2019 Posted June 28, 2019 8 minutes ago, Chris from Rochester said: Even if he is the 4th best, he's on a super cheap rookie deal right now. Develop him! This is an awful take I'm with you on this. We will keep 5-6 WR. Brown, Beasley, Jones, Roberts and Foster should be locks, then it's all out war for the last spot. If someone really impresses then I could see Foster or Jones as the bubble spot. Personally, I think we all fall for one of the outcasts in the pre-season but like the Roosevelt's of the past nothing becomes of them after the final cut.
Happy Posted June 28, 2019 Posted June 28, 2019 His linked article is on patreon.com. Anyone can be a creator and post there, so not sure what makes this guy special. Doubt Foster will be the odd man out even if the Bills only keep five WRs.
stony Posted June 28, 2019 Posted June 28, 2019 17 minutes ago, YoloinOhio said: It’s a wild take ... isnt this the analyst who is on WGR all the time? Yeah, he' usually decent. This makes no sense.
Bleeding Bills Blue Posted June 28, 2019 Posted June 28, 2019 23 minutes ago, YoloinOhio said: I had to double check that this tweet is from 2019. Sure enough, it was today. So wait... we cut the cheap one? In what world does that make sense? Only 4 are even showing up on our top 53 out of 90. We just signed Yeldon and it would save us more money to cut him and pay his guarantee, than cut foster. 3 minutes ago, stony said: Yeah, he' usually decent. This makes no sense. Eh - he makes up his mind very early on and will not change. Still loves tannehill and mariota - despite them clearly not having "it".
WhitewalkerInPhilly Posted June 28, 2019 Posted June 28, 2019 Yeah, this is ridiculous. First of all, we need outside WRs. Now, we might have Brown, and Beasley, but the modern NFL looks for a plethora of receivers. Getting rid of a good one is ridiculous. 1
Marv's Neighbor Posted June 28, 2019 Posted June 28, 2019 12 minutes ago, Gugny said: I would never trust anything I read from someone who looks like this .... 10 minutes ago, freddyjj said: and is named for a Crayola Crayon color - which they also misspelled Rob Ryan's baby picture? 2
Ridgewaycynic2013 Posted June 28, 2019 Posted June 28, 2019 (edited) “Chief O’Hara, there’s no answer on the ‘Sky Diver Phone’ - light the ‘Sky Diver Signal’!” * As for the analyst, did the barber shop catch fire, and he had to run out midway through the haircut? Edited June 28, 2019 by Ridgewaycynic2013 1
Recommended Posts