Just Joshin' Posted June 22, 2019 Posted June 22, 2019 We already have an injury prone TE with Kroft, so no thanks. He is talented when on the field but can't stay on to deliver. 4
njbuff Posted June 22, 2019 Author Posted June 22, 2019 11 minutes ago, Just Joshin' said: We already have an injury prone TE with Kroft, so no thanks. He is talented when on the field but can't stay on to deliver. I tend to agree with you, but if one more injury pops at TE............... it could become an URGENT situation.
Augie Posted June 22, 2019 Posted June 22, 2019 12 minutes ago, Just Joshin' said: We already have an injury prone TE with Kroft, so no thanks. He is talented when on the field but can't stay on to deliver. Are we snake bit, is it my imagination, or do TE’s just struggle more than some other positions. Hard to be almost OLine size mixing it up, and run almost like a WR.
brianthomas Posted June 22, 2019 Posted June 22, 2019 Whats better than 1 injury prone TE? 2 injury prone TE's Seriously though... i'll pass
HOUSE Posted June 22, 2019 Posted June 22, 2019 (edited) You just want me to google Jordan Reed. Ain't going to happen. Edited June 23, 2019 by HOUSE 4
Augie Posted June 22, 2019 Posted June 22, 2019 38 minutes ago, brianthomas said: Whats better than 1 injury prone TE? 2 injury prone TE's Seriously though... i'll pass First rule of government spending? 1
Ridgewaycynic2013 Posted June 22, 2019 Posted June 22, 2019 1 hour ago, brianthomas said: Whats better than 1 injury prone TE? 2 injury prone TE's Do they come in six packs?
CommonCents Posted June 23, 2019 Posted June 23, 2019 (edited) 1 hour ago, HOUSE said: You just wanted me to google Jordan Reed. Ain't going to happen. That’s number 3 rule in fantasy. Don’t draft any Bills. Don’t draft any Patriots. Don’t fall in love with Jordan Reed. Don’t draft Jamies Winston Edited June 23, 2019 by CommonCents 1
H2o Posted June 23, 2019 Posted June 23, 2019 Nah, he can't stay healthy. I'd rather roll the dice with what we have and let Knox gain valuable experience.
billsbackto81 Posted June 23, 2019 Posted June 23, 2019 When healthy Reed is 10X the TE Kroft is. I would much rather have him on my injured list than Kroft. Wait....., what did I just say? 5 1
Doc Brown Posted June 23, 2019 Posted June 23, 2019 Gruden has commented recently that he loves Reed's receiving ability and fit in their offense. I doubt they let him go. 1
Ayjent Posted June 23, 2019 Posted June 23, 2019 He’s worth the risk. One of the best TEs in the league.
Thurman#1 Posted June 23, 2019 Posted June 23, 2019 (edited) Here's the link to the story. Saw it yesterday, it's Bucky Brooks. Five Blockbuster Trades that would Spice Up the Season. http://www.nfl.com/news/story/0ap3000001034312/article/five-blockbuster-trades-that-would-spice-up-the-2019-nfl-season "Inspired by the Davis trade, I surveyed the NFL landscape to see which teams are a player or two away from making some noise as a potential playoff or title contender. Here are five teams that I would love to see make a blockbuster trade heading into the season, listed along with their potential ideal trade targets." So, it's more that he'd like to see it than a recommendation. Here's the Sports Injury Predictor page for Reed: https://sportsinjurypredictor.com/player/jordan-reed/6714 Tremendously talented. Not sure he's the kind of guy that they're looking for, though. Edited June 23, 2019 by Thurman#1
ProcessTruster Posted June 23, 2019 Posted June 23, 2019 10 hours ago, H2o said: Nah, he can't stay healthy. I'd rather roll the dice with what we have and let Knox gain valuable experience. Injured, expensive shiny object. Pass. Trust the process.
CSBill Posted June 23, 2019 Posted June 23, 2019 Depends, for the right price, YES! Injury prone or not, for the right (affordable) price, he is well worth taking a gamble on.
NewEra Posted June 23, 2019 Posted June 23, 2019 I trade for him if the skins gave us a 2nd rd pick to take his 9-10 mill a year contract off their hands....:and we have them Joel Klopfenstein + $8
1st Ammendment NoMas Posted June 23, 2019 Posted June 23, 2019 (edited) Everything is relative to money. If Reed comes on a cheap deal, it is a no-brainer. It's 2 injury prone TE's who can produce. Fine, they don't have to be on the field at the same time. If they can be great, but it takes some of the stress off carrying the position. With Knox learning the ropes and showing progress, that makes a nice 3 man rotation. Then it's up to Croom, Smith, Sweeney and Towbridge to take the last roster spot. So it comes down to Reed vs one of the remaining TE's. We have the cap space for a team friendly 1-2yr deal. I'll take the gamble on Reed over one of the remaining TE's any day of the week. If for some reason one of the young kids shows promise, cutting Reed or Kroft or if they get hurt, it is not going to kill the cap. Edited June 23, 2019 by BillsRdue
Recommended Posts