nodnarb Posted April 2, 2005 Posted April 2, 2005 (Sorry if this has already been posted. Didn't see it) Has the bills at 6.2 under, which is a lot better than most teams. Actually, they left off the decimal point so the bills are 62 million under the cap. Sweet. http://sports.espn.go.com/nfl/columns/stor...john&id=2004973
ajzepp Posted April 2, 2005 Posted April 2, 2005 (Sorry if this has already been posted. Didn't see it) Has the bills at 6.2 under, which is a lot better than most teams. Actually, they left off the decimal point so the bills are 62 million under the cap. Sweet. http://sports.espn.go.com/nfl/columns/stor...john&id=2004973 294348[/snapback] lol.....TD is a friggin GENIOUS!!!!!!!!!!
BillsWatch Posted April 3, 2005 Posted April 3, 2005 Might be .62 Million 294363[/snapback] Not likely. It appears to be a missing decimal point and all times he meant less than a million he stated actual number. It would have been better just to use actual figures rather than mixing format; it is much cleaner.
McGill Bill Posted April 3, 2005 Posted April 3, 2005 That's amazing. It seems like just a few weeks ago that Clayton was saying the Bills were less than a million under? Where has the money come from?
jarthur31 Posted April 3, 2005 Posted April 3, 2005 Ralphie and TD were spotted at the craps table in Sin City last weekend. Both left with a grin and a slight gleam in their soon-to-be malfuctioning eyes.
Arkady Renko Posted April 3, 2005 Posted April 3, 2005 No way the Bills are $6.2 million under 294504[/snapback] Any chance some unannounced restructuring changed things?
todd Posted April 3, 2005 Posted April 3, 2005 No way the Bills are $6.2 million under 294504[/snapback] Unless I'm mistaken, only the top 53 players count towards the team's offical cap number. That could account for the difference.
Mike32282 Posted April 3, 2005 Posted April 3, 2005 No way the Bills are $6.2 million under 294504[/snapback] Maybe Mike Williams already extended his deal? Wouldn't that free up a lot of money?
Nanker Posted April 3, 2005 Posted April 3, 2005 They cut Moulds and Williams. That must be it. Someone should shoot Clayton Clumpy's page. On second thought, someone should just shoot Clayton.
McGill Bill Posted April 3, 2005 Posted April 3, 2005 On second thought, someone should just shoot Clayton. 294563[/snapback] I hear ya! Lenny's better.
Recommended Posts