Happy Days Lois & Clark Posted April 2, 2005 Posted April 2, 2005 Frank Gore RB 6 Cedrick Williams CB 8 Mike Patterson DT 9 Lamont Reid CB 9 Eric Moore DE 9 Mike Mongomery DE 9 Chris Henry WR 9 Roscoe Parish WR 10 Travis Daniels CB 10 Howard Gilmore WR 10
Astrobot Posted April 2, 2005 Posted April 2, 2005 Jason Peters---9, but he was one of several players who scored on defense this year...
IDBillzFan Posted April 2, 2005 Posted April 2, 2005 Just out of curiosity...what is your Wonderlic score?
Kelly the Dog Posted April 2, 2005 Posted April 2, 2005 Just out of curiosity...what is your Wonderlic score? 294094[/snapback] More important, what is his windowlick score?
Happy Days Lois & Clark Posted April 2, 2005 Author Posted April 2, 2005 Just out of curiosity...what is your Wonderlic score? 294094[/snapback] An IQ test players take prior to being drafted See the link below for sample questions http://espn.go.com/page2/s/closer/020228test.html
Art in PNS Posted April 2, 2005 Posted April 2, 2005 An IQ test players take prior to being draftedSee the link below for sample questions http://espn.go.com/page2/s/closer/020228test.html 294103[/snapback] Missed one damn it !!!!
justnzane Posted April 2, 2005 Posted April 2, 2005 Jason Peters---9, but he was one of several players who scored on defense this year... 294090[/snapback] actually that would count as special teams
Tux of Borg Posted April 2, 2005 Posted April 2, 2005 I don't know why this subject keeps coming back up. Once again the University of Miami is leading the way with the lowest scores. Yet, the 'U' will produce a large number of the 1st round picks this year.
Pac_Man Posted April 2, 2005 Posted April 2, 2005 I wonder what the correlation is between a player's Wonderlic Score and his chance of success in the NFL. I know the Patriots like their players smart.
Arkady Renko Posted April 2, 2005 Posted April 2, 2005 I wonder what the correlation is between a player's Wonderlic Score and his chance of success in the NFL. I know the Patriots like their players smart. 294173[/snapback] It actually depends on the position.
Typical TBD Guy Posted April 2, 2005 Posted April 2, 2005 It actually depends on the position. 294206[/snapback] For some reason, offensive linemen traditionally have the highest average Wonderlic scores among all other positions. Anyone know why that might be?
Peter Posted April 2, 2005 Posted April 2, 2005 For what it is worth, Frank Gore has a learning disability.
Guest BackInDaDay Posted April 2, 2005 Posted April 2, 2005 For some reason, offensive linemen traditionally have the highest average Wonderlic scores among all other positions. Anyone know why that might be? 294324[/snapback] They're usually very large, intimidating fellows, repulsive to most women and therefore seldom invited out. Splitting their time equally between masturbation, devouring buckets of fast foods, and watching the hot anchorwomen on CNN, they channel their sexual frustrations and resentments into anger, girth, and an above normal awareness of the world around them. That's for all my old OL buddies.
Chef Jim Posted April 3, 2005 Posted April 3, 2005 An IQ test players take prior to being draftedSee the link below for sample questions http://espn.go.com/page2/s/closer/020228test.html 294103[/snapback] I think he just answered your question LA....
IDBillzFan Posted April 3, 2005 Posted April 3, 2005 I think he just answered your question LA.... 294631[/snapback] In a roundabout way, I guess. Frankly, I was surprised to see how stupid the questions are. On the other hand, what was not explained is exactly how many questions there are on the test and exactly how much time they have to answer them. They could be the simplest questions in the world, but if there are 100 questions and you have 10 minutes to answer them, you know the test won't get finished, etc. That's probably a bunch of crap, but nonetheless I find it hard to believe that THOSE are the questions and these guys still get a bunch of them wrong. Alternately, I've also been amazed how many people here have a hard time completing a full sentence and yet figured out how to access the internet.
Pete Posted April 3, 2005 Posted April 3, 2005 In a roundabout way, I guess. Frankly, I was surprised to see how stupid the questions are. On the other hand, what was not explained is exactly how many questions there are on the test and exactly how much time they have to answer them. They could be the simplest questions in the world, but if there are 100 questions and you have 10 minutes to answer them, you know the test won't get finished, etc. That's probably a bunch of crap, but nonetheless I find it hard to believe that THOSE are the questions and these guys still get a bunch of them wrong. Alternately, I've also been amazed how many people here have a hard time completing a full sentence and yet figured out how to access the internet. 294634[/snapback] Its 50 questions, each progressively harder that need to be answered in 12 minutes. Only 1 person in NFL history scored a perfect 50- Harvard graduate and Bengal Punter Pat Mcinally. What blows my mind is many of those questions are multiple choice and you are not penalized for wrong answers. Frankly anyone that scores a 6 on a wonderlic is illiterate. Hell I just scored a 15 on that ESPN wonderlic and that test did not take me 2 minutes
Dwight Drane Posted April 3, 2005 Posted April 3, 2005 They're usually very large, intimidating fellows, repulsive to most women and therefore seldom invited out. Splitting their time equally between masturbation, devouring buckets of fast foods, and watching the hot anchorwomen on CNN, they channel their sexual frustrations and resentments into anger, girth, and an above normal awareness of the world around them. That's for all my old OL buddies. 294355[/snapback] That's awesome! Although, I usually watch MSNBC.
LabattBlue Posted April 3, 2005 Posted April 3, 2005 Three questions come to mind when wondering about college players that score poorly on the wonderlic.... 1. How the heck did they stay academically eligible throughout college? 2. How do they understand complex NFL offensive & defensive schemes? 3. Is there a correlation between "bad" character players and players who score poorly on this test?
Sound_n_Fury Posted April 3, 2005 Posted April 3, 2005 Frank Gore RB 6Cedrick Williams CB 8 Mike Patterson DT 9 Lamont Reid CB 9 Eric Moore DE 9 Mike Mongomery DE 9 Chris Henry WR 9 Roscoe Parish WR 10 Travis Daniels CB 10 Howard Gilmore WR 10 294087[/snapback] Frankly, I'd love to see the Wonderlic made a requirement for TSW regisration. How about this topic thread: "Dumb As Dirt - Too stupid to post, Wonderlic scores"
Kelly the Dog Posted April 3, 2005 Posted April 3, 2005 IT'S LITTLE WONDER With the draft rapidly approaching, the controversial Wonderlic test is once again in the news. While the amount of weight given to Wonderlic results varies from team to team, Giants director of counseling services Dr. Joel Goldberg doesn't like the test one bit - at least for football players. "I don't think it's necessarily used well by the NFL," Goldberg told The Post. "I've still never seen a validation study that correlates success on that test to success in the NFL." Goldberg continued to point out that most football learning is accomplished through repetition and has nothing to do with the cognitive skills that are measured by the Wonderlic. "That doesn't show how well someone will perform on a football field or how quickly they'll learn," he said. "I wouldn't pay any mind whatsoever to the results." For those interested in the results, the only confirmed perfect score of 50 was posted in the late '70s by former Bengals punter/receiver Pat McInally, who - no surprise here - attended Harvard. However, one only has to look at 49ers star linebacker Julian Peterson, who only scored a five out of 50, to see that the results don't always correlate to NFL success. Among the locals, Tiki Barber (30) and Michael Strahan (28) fared very well, while Jets counterparts Curtis Martin (18) and John Abraham (16) had a more difficult time with the Wonderlic. Tom Brady (33) and Ricky Williams (30) both scored pretty well on the test, while new Giants receiver Plaxico Burress posted only a 15. Interesting little blurb from the NY Post. Curtis Martin seems like one of the smartest running backs I have ever watched, as a football player. He got an 18. Julian Peterson got a 5. Rickey Williams a 30. Hmmmm...
Recommended Posts