Buffalo_Gal Posted November 5, 2019 Posted November 5, 2019 So, he testifies to one thing, the "transcripts" gets released and he has an "oopsie" moment and goes back and changes his testimony. Link to article. A key witness in the House impeachment inquiry has changed his testimony to reveal that he told a ranking Ukrainian official that the country probably would not get nearly $400 million in US military aid unless it announced investigations that President Trump wanted. In the updated testimony, Gordon Sondland, the US ambassador to the European Union — and one of the “three amigos” running Trump’s Ukraine policy — said he had discussed the request with Andriy Yermak, a top adviser to President Volodymyr Zelensky at a Sept. 1 meeting between Vice President Pence and Zelensky in Warsaw. Zelensky had also discussed the aid with Pence, Sondland said. “I said that resumption of the US aid would likely not occur until Ukraine provided the public anti-corruption statement that we had been discussing for many weeks,” Sondland said in the document. </snip> 2
Albwan Posted November 5, 2019 Posted November 5, 2019 (edited) 11 minutes ago, Buffalo_Gal said: So, he testifies to one thing, the "transcripts" gets released and he has an "oopsie" moment and goes back and changes his testimony. Link to article. A key witness in the House impeachment inquiry has changed his testimony to reveal that he told a ranking Ukrainian official that the country probably would not get nearly $400 million in US military aid unless it announced investigations that President Trump wanted. In the updated testimony, Gordon Sondland, the US ambassador to the European Union — and one of the “three amigos” running Trump’s Ukraine policy — said he had discussed the request with Andriy Yermak, a top adviser to President Volodymyr Zelensky at a Sept. 1 meeting between Vice President Pence and Zelensky in Warsaw. Zelensky had also discussed the aid with Pence, Sondland said. “I said that resumption of the US aid would likely not occur until Ukraine provided the public anti-corruption statement that we had been discussing for many weeks,” Sondland said in the document. </snip> "updated testimony" I'm calling bull^%$&, pardon my french. This is exactly what Trump says it is, a lynch mob. Edited November 5, 2019 by Albwan
3rdnlng Posted November 5, 2019 Posted November 5, 2019 Even if the Trump administration told Ukraine that they weren't getting any money until they showed a commitment to getting rid of corruption they were fine, but they didn't even do that. 2
Deranged Rhino Posted November 6, 2019 Posted November 6, 2019 Thread (and a thread inside a thread) worth checking out: *********************** 2 4
B-Man Posted November 6, 2019 Posted November 6, 2019 Crumbling: Yet Another Poll on Impeachment Inquiry Raises Serious Red Flags About Schiff’s Show Trial Charade Democrats might be under the impression that a majority of voters are on their side when it comes to impeaching President Trump, but a new poll indicates that what support they do have is starting to crumble. Morning Consult reports: https://www.redstate.com/sister-toldjah/2019/11/06/crumbling-yet-another-poll-impeachment-inquiry-raises-serious-red-flags-schiffs-show-trial-charade/ 1 1
3rdnlng Posted November 6, 2019 Posted November 6, 2019 46 minutes ago, B-Man said: Crumbling: Yet Another Poll on Impeachment Inquiry Raises Serious Red Flags About Schiff’s Show Trial Charade Democrats might be under the impression that a majority of voters are on their side when it comes to impeaching President Trump, but a new poll indicates that what support they do have is starting to crumble. Morning Consult reports: https://www.redstate.com/sister-toldjah/2019/11/06/crumbling-yet-another-poll-impeachment-inquiry-raises-serious-red-flags-schiffs-show-trial-charade/ Pelosi & Schiff have nothing on Trump but they are raising expectations by continuing on with this farce. Their rules seem designed to give him an unfair impeachment hearing. I say let it happen and get to a trial in the Senate. Do not even request a dismissal. Have the trial and get all of the witnesses to testify. When the public sees what Pelosi, Schiff & Company tried to pull off there will be a lot of embarrassed dems.
Foxx Posted November 6, 2019 Posted November 6, 2019 https://twitter.com/ChadPergram/status/1192182330829475841 why did they revoke the subpoena? are they afraid that the court would say the impeachment process is flawed and side with the Trump administration? 3 2
Deranged Rhino Posted November 6, 2019 Posted November 6, 2019 https://mobile.twitter.com/C_3C_3/status/1192202547743866884 2 3
Buffalo_Gal Posted November 6, 2019 Posted November 6, 2019 1 minute ago, Deranged Rhino said: https://mobile.twitter.com/C_3C_3/status/1192202547743866884 Of course he wasn't... SMH 1
Tiberius Posted November 7, 2019 Author Posted November 7, 2019 Flailing LIVE UPDATES Trump lashes out at lawyer for whistleblower The president called for an immediate end to the impeachment inquiry. By John Wagner 24 minutes ago
row_33 Posted November 7, 2019 Posted November 7, 2019 getting impatient over here when are they going to preempt all the major network programming all day long for months on end to carry this Hearing?
keepthefaith Posted November 7, 2019 Posted November 7, 2019 38 minutes ago, Buffalo_Gal said: Spectacular and she's earned a large helping of disrespect. 1
Recommended Posts