Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
5 hours ago, Tiberius said:

Oh look, every House Republican has failed to uphold their oath to defend the Constitution! Lawless pro Russian scum 

 

You're almost there, buddy. You're so close to figuring out why the liberals won't win in 2020!

 

2 hours ago, 3rdnlng said:

If the Left felt that they could beat him next November they would not be pushing for this fake impeachment. They have emptied their clip and are now throwing their gun at him.

 

I'd think it's more accurate to say that the Democrats have emptied the magazine, thrown the gun, and are now using their fingers as guns saying "pew pew" as they run around the playground.

  • Haha (+1) 3
Posted

  

 

 

Impeachment Vote Will Cost
These Dems Their Seats

by David Catron

Original Article

 

During the 2018 midterms, dozens of “moderate” Democrats won House seats in swing districts by forswearing partisan feuds in order to concentrate on the needs of their constituents. They pledged to focus less on conflict than on finding common ground with their Republican colleagues. They also modulated their comments concerning President Trump and, when the subject of impeachment arose, they insisted that it would be a destructive and unproductive exercise.

 

Thursday, however, all but two voted in favor of a hyper-partisan impeachment resolution, exposing their campaign promises as cynical lies and ensuring that the Democrats will lose their House majority in 2020.

 

 

.

Posted

"The Pelosi impeachment resolution was supposed to deprive the GOP of its complaint that the process wasn't formal. Instead, it formalized a rigged process..."

 
"... and gives Republicans a solid rationale for rejecting the entire proceeding. Democrats gripe that the GOP refuses to talk about the substance of the case against the president.
 
But it is Democrats who have made that impossible, given the secrecy and one-sided approach. Due process is at the heart of America's system of ordered liberty, and the 'evidence' Democrats are secretly compiling in the basement of the House is already soiled. That's why every House Republican -- even vulnerable ones -- felt confident in voting 'no' on Thursday's resolution.
 
Republicans pointed out that even as Democrats were claiming the vote meant 'transparency,' Intelligence Chairman Adam Schiff was holding another closed hearing, to which most of the House and the president's legal counsel weren't privy. 'Democrats cannot fix this process,' said House GOP Conference Chair Liz Cheney after the vote. 'This is a process that has been fundamentally tainted.'"

Writes Kimberly Strassel in "A Partisan Impeachment Vote" (WSJ). She notes that when the House impeached Bill Clinton, there was a motion to dismiss in the Senate. The motion was voted down, so the Senate went on to conduct its idea of a trial, so the Democrats established a precedent for a motion to dismiss, and — Strassel says — the GOP majority in the Senate could vote yes on such a motion in the Trump case, based on the unfairness of the process in the House
 
 
 
 
.
  • Like (+1) 1
Posted
3 minutes ago, B-Man said:

"The Pelosi impeachment resolution was supposed to deprive the GOP of its complaint that the process wasn't formal. Instead, it formalized a rigged process..."

 
"... and gives Republicans a solid rationale for rejecting the entire proceeding. Democrats gripe that the GOP refuses to talk about the substance of the case against the president.
 
But it is Democrats who have made that impossible, given the secrecy and one-sided approach. Due process is at the heart of America's system of ordered liberty, and the 'evidence' Democrats are secretly compiling in the basement of the House is already soiled. That's why every House Republican -- even vulnerable ones -- felt confident in voting 'no' on Thursday's resolution.
 
Republicans pointed out that even as Democrats were claiming the vote meant 'transparency,' Intelligence Chairman Adam Schiff was holding another closed hearing, to which most of the House and the president's legal counsel weren't privy. 'Democrats cannot fix this process,' said House GOP Conference Chair Liz Cheney after the vote. 'This is a process that has been fundamentally tainted.'"

Writes Kimberly Strassel in "A Partisan Impeachment Vote" (WSJ). She notes that when the House impeached Bill Clinton, there was a motion to dismiss in the Senate. The motion was voted down, so the Senate went on to conduct its idea of a trial, so the Democrats established a precedent for a motion to dismiss, and — Strassel says — the GOP majority in the Senate could vote yes on such a motion in the Trump case, based on the unfairness of the process in the House
 
 
 
 
.

Oh don't worry, the public testimony will begin soon enough. Then you guys will be forced to at least face questions about the substance of Trumps criminal acts 

Posted
20 hours ago, Tiberius said:

Dream on! You guys got this piece of garbage over the goal line once with Russian help, not going to happen again. 

 

I mean seriously, what’s he going to run on? Infrastructure? Health care? Tax cuts? Tariff wars? Nope 

 

Well Tibs….sounds like you should throw your hat in the Primary Ring.  You appear to have a platform all laid out there. Two questions....are you an American, and are you over 35?

Impeachment trial in a nutshell:

 

Senate: President Trump, was it your intent to withhold foreign aid in exchange for political favors?

Trump: No

Senate:  I guess we're done here.

  • Like (+1) 1
Posted
2 hours ago, Deranged Rhino said:

 

 

The Left insults our intelligence with the degree of hubris they appear to have. Do they actually think that their duplicity (LTC Vindman for example) won't be found out?

  • Like (+1) 3
Posted
52 minutes ago, 3rdnlng said:

The Left insults our intelligence with the degree of hubris they appear to have. Do they actually think that their duplicity (LTC Vindman for example) won't be found out?

So you are ok with Trump using a foreign nation to interfere in our elections? 

 

Yes, yes you are 

Posted
14 minutes ago, Tiberius said:

So you are ok with Trump using a foreign nation to interfere in our elections?

 

If it's good enough for the Dems...

  • Like (+1) 2
  • Haha (+1) 2
Posted
Just now, Doc said:

 

If it's good enough for the Dems...

So you are ok with selling out our sovereignty because the Dems did it first (in you imagination) 

 

You consider yourself a patriot? 

 

You scream and pull pull your dirty short hairs when a black guy does stand for the anthem? 

 

 

Posted

Gator’s desperation is really on display today 

 

Would any of us who have read Doc’s posts over the years have written anything as obviously backwards as Tibsy did above?

 

I hope he is wearing a bib , that drool must be everywhere 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

.

Posted
27 minutes ago, Tiberius said:

So you are ok with selling out our sovereignty because the Dems did it first (in you imagination) 

 

You consider yourself a patriot? 

 

You scream and pull pull your dirty short hairs when a black guy does stand for the anthem?

 

What was sold out? 

Posted
30 minutes ago, Tiberius said:

So you are ok with selling out our sovereignty because the Dems did it first (in you imagination) 

 

You consider yourself a patriot? 

 

You scream and pull pull your dirty short hairs when a black guy does stand for the anthem? 

 

 

And...there it is Tibs….you finally pulled out the race card. Nice!

×
×
  • Create New...