njbuff Posted October 28, 2019 Posted October 28, 2019 5 hours ago, Doc said: IOW, deplorables. Smelly Walmart people. 4 hours ago, row_33 said: this week Schiff: 1) prank calls a neighbor 2) returns a pair of jeans 3) tries a Buffalo Wing for the first time The skits aren't really funny, but the character is as funny as hell. 1
Warren Zevon Posted October 28, 2019 Posted October 28, 2019 2 minutes ago, njbuff said: Smelly Walmart people.
DC Tom Posted October 28, 2019 Posted October 28, 2019 26 minutes ago, Hedge said: All the Democrats are going to vote yes, because he didn't take any of them to the baseball game. 1
Buffalo_Gal Posted October 28, 2019 Posted October 28, 2019 33 minutes ago, Hedge said: Fourth (fifth?) time is a charm? 2
Foxx Posted October 28, 2019 Posted October 28, 2019 39 minutes ago, Hedge said: is this a side step to actually voting on an investigation or will they actually authorize one? 2
B-Man Posted October 28, 2019 Posted October 28, 2019 Maybe they hope it will be voted down! Suddenly, House Democrats want a formal vote on impeachment. The NYT reports. The vote will take place on Thursday, and it will be presented as whether to “affirm” the inquiry... which seems to say that they don't want to admit that they were doing it wrong, just asking for an affirmation. Democrats are good enough. They're smart enough. And doggone it, people like them.My first thought was, the Democrats are in trouble, they know the impeachment inquiry is dragging them down, and they want the vote to fail. But here's how Nancy Pelosi put it: “This resolution establishes the procedure for hearings that are open to the American people, authorizes the disclosure of deposition transcripts, outlines procedures to transfer evidence to the Judiciary Committee as it considers potential articles of impeachment, and sets forth due process rights for the president and his counsel.... We are taking this step to eliminate any doubt as to whether the Trump administration may withhold documents, prevent witness testimony, disregard duly authorized subpoenas, or continue obstructing the House of Representatives." In other words, the procedural arguments are damaging and distracting, and they want to knock them out of the picture.
Deranged Rhino Posted October 28, 2019 Posted October 28, 2019 16 minutes ago, Foxx said: is this a side step to actually voting on an investigation or will they actually authorize one? FWIW 4
njbuff Posted October 28, 2019 Posted October 28, 2019 Why can't Pelosi be impeached? Aren't there rules to being dead drunk all the time? And shouldn't it be illegal to speak in public and in front of cameras with your dentures constantly trying to fly out of your mouth?
row_33 Posted October 28, 2019 Posted October 28, 2019 29 minutes ago, njbuff said: Why can't Pelosi be impeached? Aren't there rules to being dead drunk all the time? And shouldn't it be illegal to speak in public and in front of cameras with your dentures constantly trying to fly out of your mouth? 15 judges have been impeached, including a SCOTUS justice (LBJ"s gopher) and a US Senator and a Cabinet member oh yes, and two Presidents
Foxx Posted October 28, 2019 Posted October 28, 2019 (edited) 34 minutes ago, Deranged Rhino said: FWIW thanks, that was kind of my understanding from the wording on the Tweet Hedge posted, hence my question. Dems still avoiding going on record as to whether or not they support impeachment. https://twitter.com/The_War_Economy/status/1188908757478203392 Edited October 28, 2019 by Foxx 1
Foxx Posted October 28, 2019 Posted October 28, 2019 45 minutes ago, Deranged Rhino said: FWIW actually, reading the letter where it says, "we will bring a resolution to the Floor that affirms the ongoing, existing investigation" means that they will have to go on record. we will see however whether or not the actual wording of the resolution reflects this or not. 1 1
B-Man Posted October 28, 2019 Posted October 28, 2019 I ‘4 more years’ it is! House Dems’ announce planned next step on Trump impeachment (‘word salad’ alert!) The House Dems’ ongoing effort to make their base believe they’re moving closer to impeaching President Trump without actually doing so continues with a planned vote this week, but not on actual impeachment: The House will vote this week on a resolution to formalize the next steps of the impeachment inquiry into Trumphttp://bit.ly/2BMk0zA House to vote on resolution establishing next steps in impeachment inquiry politico.com House Democrats now suddenly saying they'll vote on an impeachment resolution to “ensure transparency” is rich—considering they've spent weeks conducting interviews in secret, leaking their own talking points while locking down any and all information that benefits the President We’re just guessing that after the House vote on whatever jumbled wording is in the resolution, they will return to doing exactly what they’ve been doing https://twitchy.com/dougp-3137/2019/10/28/4-more-years-it-is-house-dems-announce-planned-next-step-on-trump-impeachment-word-salad-alert/
DC Tom Posted October 28, 2019 Posted October 28, 2019 1 hour ago, Deranged Rhino said: FWIW As I said before. The House has the sole, unfettered authority to determine impeachment procedures. If the House decides the proper procedure is closed committee hearings without a full House authorization to proceed, that's entirely Constitutional. Just like it's the Senate's sole, unfettered authority to determine how "advice and consent" works, and if they decide the Senate chair can park it and not forward it to committee or a floor vote, that's entirely Constitutional... ...wait a minute. The Democrats couldn't possibly be exercising a double-standard, could they? 2 1
RochesterRob Posted October 29, 2019 Posted October 29, 2019 2 hours ago, B-Man said: I ‘4 more years’ it is! House Dems’ announce planned next step on Trump impeachment (‘word salad’ alert!) The House Dems’ ongoing effort to make their base believe they’re moving closer to impeaching President Trump without actually doing so continues with a planned vote this week, but not on actual impeachment: The House will vote this week on a resolution to formalize the next steps of the impeachment inquiry into Trumphttp://bit.ly/2BMk0zA House to vote on resolution establishing next steps in impeachment inquiry politico.com House Democrats now suddenly saying they'll vote on an impeachment resolution to “ensure transparency” is rich—considering they've spent weeks conducting interviews in secret, leaking their own talking points while locking down any and all information that benefits the President We’re just guessing that after the House vote on whatever jumbled wording is in the resolution, they will return to doing exactly what they’ve been doing https://twitchy.com/dougp-3137/2019/10/28/4-more-years-it-is-house-dems-announce-planned-next-step-on-trump-impeachment-word-salad-alert/ Teasing like what Pelosi is doing would make the most bawdy red light district working girl envious. Where does Nancy put the 100 dollar bills?
daz28 Posted October 29, 2019 Posted October 29, 2019 https://townhall.com/tipsheet/bethbaumann/2019/10/28/breaking-top-ukraine-expert-on-national-security-council-plans-to-testify-about-trumpzelensky-call-n2555490
Tiberius Posted October 29, 2019 Author Posted October 29, 2019 “I did not think it was proper to demand that a foreign government investigate a U.S. citizen, and I was worried about the implications for the U.S. government’s support of Ukraine,” Vindman intends to tell lawmakers, according to a draft of his opening statement. Time for Trump cultist to attack another member of the military
daz28 Posted October 29, 2019 Posted October 29, 2019 https://www.rawstory.com/2019/10/oh-my-god-msnbcs-morning-joe-torches-fox-news-for-disgusting-spy-slurs-against-new-impeachment-witness/
Recommended Posts