3rdnlng Posted October 25, 2019 Posted October 25, 2019 3 minutes ago, DC Tom said: Didn't even know murder by a jury was a crime... Read it again in your native language.
Deranged Rhino Posted October 25, 2019 Posted October 25, 2019 (re Pelosi at Cummings' service just now) 1
Tiberius Posted October 25, 2019 Author Posted October 25, 2019 (edited) 6 minutes ago, Deranged Rhino said: (re Pelosi at Cummings' service just now) Oh Rosie Dear don't you think it's que er? Edited October 25, 2019 by Tiberius
3rdnlng Posted October 25, 2019 Posted October 25, 2019 10 hours ago, Deranged Rhino said: Chris Wallace was on a few minutes ago comparing the Benghazi hearings to this whatever you want to call it "investigation". He basically said that they were being handled in the same way. No, they are not. Every day there are leaks or fabrications coming from the people who want to see Trump hurt. I say "hurt" because this is all a big fvcking farce. The last thing they want to do is impeach Trump. They want to damage Trump without having to go on record regarding impeachment. They also are trying to make the coming lowering of the boom on the criminals that were attempting a soft coup, a political thing. 2
Deranged Rhino Posted October 25, 2019 Posted October 25, 2019 Just now, 3rdnlng said: Chris Wallace was on a few minutes ago comparing the Benghazi hearings to this whatever you want to call it "investigation". He basically said that they were being handled in the same way. No, they are not. Every day there are leaks or fabrications coming from the people who want to see Trump hurt. I say "hurt" because this is all a big fvcking farce. The last thing they want to do is impeach Trump. They want to damage Trump without having to go on record regarding impeachment. They also are trying to make the coming lowering of the boom on the criminals that were attempting a soft coup, a political thing. Yup. Benghazi was not an impeachment push -- even with the political theater involved in those hearings. It's a very different kettle of fish. 4 dead bodies, including a US ambassador, demands a very different procedure than investigating what happened on a (now) unclassified call which we all can read for ourselves. The attempt to conflate the two is a sign of a weak mind/argument. So of course Wallace pushes it. He's a hack. 1
3rdnlng Posted October 25, 2019 Posted October 25, 2019 5 minutes ago, Deranged Rhino said: Yup. Benghazi was not an impeachment push -- even with the political theater involved in those hearings. It's a very different kettle of fish. 4 dead bodies, including a US ambassador, demands a very different procedure than investigating what happened on a (now) unclassified call which we all can read for ourselves. The attempt to conflate the two is a sign of a weak mind/argument. So of course Wallace pushes it. He's a hack. There was a time when I thought Wallace was pretty fair, back when he was also moderating debates. I view him now on the level of Shepard Smith, without the bitchy attitude. He doesn't tell the full story if the full story is going to support conservatives. 1
B-Man Posted October 25, 2019 Posted October 25, 2019 WHAT PROCESS? Republicans Fight Trump’s Impeachment by Attacking the Process. Obfuscation and expediency is not a process. . 1
DC Tom Posted October 25, 2019 Posted October 25, 2019 1 hour ago, Deranged Rhino said: (re Pelosi at Cummings' service just now) Pelosi's been a terrible speaker ever since she went to Syria to pursue a completely separate Congressional foreign policy with Assad. 1
Tiberius Posted October 25, 2019 Author Posted October 25, 2019 The silence of Senate Republicans is deafening
Deranged Rhino Posted October 25, 2019 Posted October 25, 2019 They launched the Ukraine gambit too soon. It was designed to deflect from the Barr/Durham criminal investigations — but now it’s dead and buried long before it can serve its true purpose. Going to be fun times ahead. Get the popcorn. 1 1
DC Tom Posted October 25, 2019 Posted October 25, 2019 3 minutes ago, Deranged Rhino said: They launched the Ukraine gambit too soon. It was designed to deflect from the Barr/Durham criminal investigations — but now it’s dead and buried long before it can serve its true purpose. Going to be fun times ahead. Get the popcorn. If they're smart, they'll try to assassinate Warren or Biden next. I mean...their first inclination has to be to assassinate Trump, or Pence, or Barr. But that would be a "Reichstag fire" moment, and counter-productive. Killing off a Democratic front-runner will distract from the Barr/Durham investigation, and they can find a way to blame Trump for it, and it would probably cement the election for whichever Democrat wins the primaries, particularly if they can blame a white supremacist. Probably Warren, so they get the misogyny angle too. Then Hillary steps in "because as a government official of almost thirty years, despite my reluctance I feel it is my solemn duty to once again serve mysel- er, my country in this time of grave crisis." 1 1
3rdnlng Posted October 25, 2019 Posted October 25, 2019 Obama found many new ways to talk about himself. How many different ways can you say "I"? 30 minutes ago, Tiberius said: The silence of Senate Republicans is deafening If only they could make you mute instead.
RochesterRob Posted October 25, 2019 Posted October 25, 2019 16 minutes ago, DC Tom said: If they're smart, they'll try to assassinate Warren or Biden next. I mean...their first inclination has to be to assassinate Trump, or Pence, or Barr. But that would be a "Reichstag fire" moment, and counter-productive. Killing off a Democratic front-runner will distract from the Barr/Durham investigation, and they can find a way to blame Trump for it, and it would probably cement the election for whichever Democrat wins the primaries, particularly if they can blame a white supremacist. Probably Warren, so they get the misogyny angle too. Then Hillary steps in "because as a government official of almost thirty years, despite my reluctance I feel it is my solemn duty to once again serve mysel- er, my country in this time of grave crisis." Sadly and somewhat fearfully I see this as a real life scenario. Somebody in the Democratic Party (Hillary) wants power at any cost and does not care as to the damage it will do to this country. 1
Doc Posted October 25, 2019 Posted October 25, 2019 45 minutes ago, Tiberius said: The silence of Senate Republicans is deafening They already said that they won’t convict if the house somehow manages to get enough votes to impeach him. Not much more to say. 1
B-Man Posted October 25, 2019 Posted October 25, 2019 (edited) 56 minutes ago, Tiberius said: The silence of Senate Republicans is deafening Tibsy wrong, as usual Senate to Vote on Resolution That Calls House Impeachment Proceedings ‘Illegitimate.’ . Edited October 25, 2019 by B-Man 2
Tiberius Posted October 25, 2019 Author Posted October 25, 2019 1 hour ago, Deranged Rhino said: Yup. Benghazi was not an impeachment push -- even with the political theater involved in those hearings. It's a very different kettle of fish. 4 dead bodies, including a US ambassador, demands a very different procedure than investigating what happened on a (now) unclassified call which we all can read for ourselves. The attempt to conflate the two is a sign of a weak mind/argument. So of course Wallace pushes it. He's a hack. You guys pushed a fake investigation and the Dems are holding the president to account for lawless actions, that's the difference
Recommended Posts