Koko78 Posted October 11, 2019 Posted October 11, 2019 2 minutes ago, DC Tom said: You failed miserably. Liberal logic is "Reid was forced to, by Republican obstructionism. He just did what was necessary. McConnell, on the other hand, unconstitutionally withheld the nomination from a floor vote, violating the "advice and consent" clause." Which liberal logic ignores...well, reality. It's based on the first-grade legal principle of "I want it! Gimmee!" Well... schiff.
Chef Jim Posted October 11, 2019 Posted October 11, 2019 2 minutes ago, Koko78 said: Well... schiff. You rang? 1
Hedge Posted October 11, 2019 Posted October 11, 2019 16 minutes ago, Koko78 said: This is going to hurt, but I'm going to attempt liberal "logic": If McConnell wasn't such a mean poopy head, forcing Reid to go nuclear, then McConnell wouldn't have any precedent to remove the filibuster to allow Adolph Gorsuch and the beer-loving rapist onto the Supreme Court. Therefore, This is all Trump's fault, and he must be immediately impeached at all costs (followed by radical wealth redistribution after Hillary retroactively becomes president for reasons)! 7 minutes ago, DC Tom said: You failed miserably. Liberal logic is "Reid was forced to, by Republican obstructionism. He just did what was necessary. McConnell, on the other hand, unconstitutionally withheld the nomination from a floor vote, violating the "advice and consent" clause." Which liberal logic ignores...well, reality. It's based on the first-grade legal principle of "I want it! Gimmee!" Disappointed that neither one of you incorporated dance to help drive it home. 2
Koko78 Posted October 12, 2019 Posted October 12, 2019 3 hours ago, Hedge said: Disappointed that neither one of you incorporated dance to help drive it home. Well I had successfully suppressed any memory of watching that horrific performance. Thanks. 1
4merper4mer Posted October 12, 2019 Posted October 12, 2019 4 hours ago, Hedge said: Disappointed that neither one of you incorporated dance to help drive it home. Looks like exstinktion would have been a better name.
transplantbillsfan Posted October 12, 2019 Posted October 12, 2019 18 hours ago, Deranged Rhino said: You referred to it and erroneously attributed Reid’s action to Mitch. At least be honest. The ignorance you’re displaying is staggering. Oh. You're just misunderstanding what I said. Why did you assume the breaking of the filibuster was one of the precedents he broke? That sentence didn't require that connection, but you assumed it nonetheless in your seemingly overwhelming desire to belittle anyone with different views than your own. The tunnel vision your arrogance is causing is staggering. 17 hours ago, njbuff said: I am no fan of either party, but go ask an independent or some with no political party who the dirty party is and see what they tell you? That is all. I just did. She said Republicans. That is all. 1
OldTimeAFLGuy Posted October 12, 2019 Posted October 12, 2019 18 hours ago, Deranged Rhino said: You referred to it and erroneously attributed Reid’s action to Mitch. At least be honest. The ignorance you’re displaying is staggering. ...I think you're being too DAMN polite........this clown could be Tib's first cousin......SMH........
Deranged Rhino Posted October 12, 2019 Posted October 12, 2019 9 minutes ago, transplantbillsfan said: Oh. You're just misunderstanding what I said. Why did you assume the breaking of the filibuster was one of the precedents he broke? That sentence didn't require that connection, You're being incredibly dishonest. You made an error -- rather than admit your error (and your ignorance), you are just flat out misrepresenting what you wrote. Fortunately, it's still there for all to see. The sentence you wrote, not me, was clear: McConnel was your only subject, and you used a conjunction to make the point. 21 hours ago, transplantbillsfan said: Since McConnell has broken so many precedents and gotten rid of the filibuster, Tell me you don't teach English, please. ***********************
DC Tom Posted October 12, 2019 Posted October 12, 2019 Just now, Deranged Rhino said: You're being incredibly dishonest. You made an error -- rather than admit your error (and your ignorance), you are just flat out misrepresenting what you wrote. Fortunately, it's still there for all to see. The sentence you wrote, not me, was clear: McConnel was your only subject, and you used a conjunction to make the point. Tell me you don't teach English, please. But he didn't mean THAT filibuster. 1
Koko78 Posted October 12, 2019 Posted October 12, 2019 14 minutes ago, transplantbillsfan said: Why did you assume the breaking of the filibuster was one of the precedents he broke? Since you're totally not being dishonest, why don't you go ahead and list all these precedents that he broke. Don't worry, we'll wait for your next attempt at being a weasel.
Foxx Posted October 12, 2019 Posted October 12, 2019 https://twitter.com/DaveNYviii/status/1182857042651963392 2
3rdnlng Posted October 12, 2019 Posted October 12, 2019 22 minutes ago, Deranged Rhino said: You're being incredibly dishonest. You made an error -- rather than admit your error (and your ignorance), you are just flat out misrepresenting what you wrote. Fortunately, it's still there for all to see. The sentence you wrote, not me, was clear: McConnel was your only subject, and you used a conjunction to make the point. Tell me you don't teach English, please. *********************** He don't.
transplantbillsfan Posted October 12, 2019 Posted October 12, 2019 6 hours ago, Deranged Rhino said: You're being incredibly dishonest. You made an error -- rather than admit your error (and your ignorance), you are just flat out misrepresenting what you wrote. Fortunately, it's still there for all to see. The sentence you wrote, not me, was clear: McConnel was your only subject, and you used a conjunction to make the point. Tell me you don't teach English, please. *********************** Not to you, otherwise I would have made you understand it better. It's a shame what you're trying to do here rather than concede your misunderstanding.
Deranged Rhino Posted October 12, 2019 Posted October 12, 2019 37 minutes ago, transplantbillsfan said: Not to you, otherwise I would have made you understand it better. It's a shame what you're trying to do here rather than concede your misunderstanding. You wrote McConnel was the one who removed the filibuster. That’s your sentence, not mine. And its 100% incorrect. Because you are gleefully uninformed on many topics. You’re gonna love your new avatar. 1
3rdnlng Posted October 13, 2019 Posted October 13, 2019 6 hours ago, Deranged Rhino said: Who is this nick cummings? There's something all too familiar about his name.
B-Man Posted October 13, 2019 Posted October 13, 2019 (edited) Pelosi under new pressure to hold an impeachment inquiry vote next week by Susan Ferrechio Original Article . Edited October 13, 2019 by B-Man 1
B-Man Posted October 13, 2019 Posted October 13, 2019 SAY IT AIN’T SO: Fox News pollster Braun Research misrepresented impeachment poll: analysis. The poll released last week by Fox News that claimed most Americans favor the impeachment of President Trump underrepresented Republican and independent voters, The Post has found. The poll said 51% of voters were in favor of Trump’s impeachment and removal from office, while 40% did not want him impeached. Princeton, New Jersey, pollster Braun Research, which conducted the survey, noted 48% of its respondents were Democrats. But the actual breakdown of party-affiliation is 31% Democrat, 29% Republican and 38% independent, according to Gallup. A poll weighted for party affiliation would have concluded that 44.9% favored impeachment and 44.4% opposed it, a Post analysis has concluded. The poll prompted Trump to tweet: “Whoever [Fox News’] Pollster is, they suck.” Harsh, but fair. . 3
Recommended Posts