Jump to content

Bi-Partisan Support For Impeachment


Recommended Posts

15 hours ago, Deranged Rhino said:

:lol: This morning the poll was 98-2 in favor of. 

 

Why, it's almost like there are a ton of Trump voters out there who are pissed, Rosie. 

 

No one doubts Trump supporters are very loyal. That is one reason impeachment would be a bad idea.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, ALF said:

 

No one doubts Trump supporters are very loyal. That is one reason impeachment would be a bad idea.

 

It's not the loyalty that's underestimated. 

 

It's their numbers. 

 

************

Pelosi giving a presser -- about wanting Trump to work with them on prescription drug prices. 

 

:lol: 

 

You can't have it both ways, Nancy. The public won't buy this act. 

 

AT ALL.

  • Like (+1) 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 minutes ago, Deranged Rhino said:

 

It's not the loyalty that's underestimated. 

 

It's their numbers. 

 

************

Pelosi giving a presser -- about wanting Trump to work with them on prescription drug prices. 

 

:lol: 

 

You can't have it both ways, Nancy. The public won't buy this act. 

 

AT ALL.

Uh, while the democrats fiddled, Trump was doing something about drug prices.

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, 3rdnlng said:

Uh, while the democrats fiddled, Trump was doing something about drug prices.

 

This whole press conference is designed to make it LOOK like the democrat caucus is legislating and working on things other than impeachment. It's a sham (but they got some Khosoggi shout outs -- without once mentioning Bernie's heart because they'd rather kiss up to a dead MB spook than a colleague), and transparent. Pelosi is TOUGH to listen to. 

 

(second tweet) :lol: 

Edited by Deranged Rhino
Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 minutes ago, Deranged Rhino said:

 

This whole press conference is designed to make it LOOK like the democrat caucus is legislating and working on things other than impeachment. It's a sham (but they got some Khosoggi shout outs -- without once mentioning Bernie's heart because they'd rather kiss up to a dead MB spook than a colleague), and transparent. Pelosi is TOUGH to listen to. 

 

(second tweet) :lol: 

That was my take on it too. I can only describe Nancy's way of speaking as "halting".

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

 

Make them pay for impeachment

by Don Surber

 

Original Article

 

Democrats believe they can impeach President Donald John Trump with impunity.

 

They figure it will be like Clinton's one-day trial and acquittal, which would allow them to scream injustice from now until forever. President Trump should extract the full price for their farce.

 

Whilst the attorney general and inspector general continue investigating Hillarygate and Muellergate, President Trump should have fun with this by forcing Democrats to make their case to the American people. Just like they did with Clarence Thomas. Just like they did with Brett Kavanaugh.

 

That means putting the whistle blower on the stand. The Constitution requires the accuser to face the accused.

 

 

 

 

And a few other names you’ll recognize. Like Barack Hussein Obama… You’ll like this idea….

 

 

 

 

.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Pelosi is trying to do impeachment on the cheap

 

Original Article

 

If House Democrats really want to impeach President Trump, they should do it right. They should own it, as previous Congresses have done when impeaching previous presidents. They should vote on the House floor to open a formal impeachment inquiry. As long as they avoid this step, they evince a lack of faith that Trump deserves to be impeached. Without a vote, they are just going through the motions of impeachment but without taking responsibility for their actions.

 

When Congress began the impeachment process for Richard Nixon, it did so with a vote. When Congress began the impeachment process of Bill Clinton, it also did so with a vote.

  • Like (+1) 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

BILL MCGURN ON PELOSI’S PERMANENT IMPEACHMENT.     By proceeding by fiat instead of a full House vote, the speaker sets a terrible precedent:

Almost a year ago Mr. Nadler advanced a similar argument about the high bar for impeaching President Trump. “If you’re serious about removing a president from office, what you’re really doing is overturning the result of the last election,” he told Roll Call. “You don’t want to have a situation where you tear this country apart, and for the next 30 years half the country’s saying, ‘We won the election, you stole it.’ ” Today that Mr. Nadler is nowhere to be found.

 

Meanwhile, with her decision to proceed with impeachment by fiat, Mrs. Pelosi has set many disturbing precedents—none more terrible than the idea that all you need is a willing speaker and you can put a congressional committee in permanent impeachment mode, using its powers to try to overturn an election.

 

“Until now, only the full House could trigger impeachment proceedings,” says Mr. Collins. “By denying that vote, she is laying the ground for perpetual impeachment proceedings—and transforming the most severe constitutional power into an irreverent messaging tool.”

 

 

 

As with Harry Reid and the filibuster, apparently Pelosi believes there will never be another Republican Congress and if there is one, they will never attempt to employ the same tactics she’s invoked against a president whom the DNC-MSM is deifying as the next FDR/JFK/BHO.

 

As Jonah Goldberg wrote over a decade ago, “Liberals are geniuses at unleashing social panics because

 

A) it never occurs to them that their motives are anything but pure and

B) because they are almost exclusively focused on short term tactics.

 

And yet they are invariably shocked when these moral frenzies come back to bite them. McCarthyism was a direct consequence of both the Red Scare and the Brown Scare. And when the tactics they mastered were turned on them, they acted as if they came from nowhere.”

 

 

 

 

.

 Posted 
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, B-Man said:

 

“Until now, only the full House could trigger impeachment proceedings,” says Mr. Collins. “By denying that vote, she is laying the ground for perpetual impeachment proceedings—and transforming the most severe constitutional power into an irreverent messaging tool.”

 

 

Because they know it won't go through.  It'll never pass the Senate.  All the House can do is make noise.

 

And they're fine with that.  Because Democrats believe Congress is nothing more than an advocacy group.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

×
×
  • Create New...