Jump to content

Bi-Partisan Support For Impeachment


Recommended Posts

The dems are falling into the exact place that Putin envisioned when he set out to partner up with them on creating the hoped for chaos that they worked so hard for in 2016. Pull the rug out from under Trump as he works hard to deal with Trade and the scourge that is Iran. Russia, China and Iran all want a weaker U.S. President. So do the dems. What party here has the best interest of the country at heart?

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

Quote

“Shall any man be above justice?” Mason asked. “Shall that man be above it who can commit the most extensive injustice?” A presidential candidate might bribe the electors to gain the presidency, Mason suggested. “Shall the man who has practiced corruption, and by that means procured his appointment in the first instance, be suffered to escape punishment by repeating his guilt?”

https://www.smithsonianmag.com/history/inside-founding-fathers-debate-over-what-constituted-impeachable-offense-180965083/

 

Quote

“Shall any man be above justice?” Mason asked. “Shall that man be above it who can commit the most extensive injustice?” A presidential candidate might bribe the electors to gain the presidency, Mason suggested. “Shall the man who has practiced corruption, and by that means procured his appointment in the first instance, be suffered to escape punishment by repeating his guilt?” Madison argued that the Constitution needed a provision “for defending the community against the incapacity, negligence, or perfidy of the Chief Magistrate.” Waiting to vote him out of office in a general election wasn’t good enough. “He might pervert his administration into a scheme of peculation”— embezzlement—“or oppression,” Madison warned. “He might betray his trust to foreign powers.”

https://www.smithsonianmag.com/history/inside-founding-fathers-debate-over-what-constituted-impeachable-offense-180965083/

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

 

 How The House Plans To Use Its ‘Inquiry’ To Instigate Impeachment.

Congress’s authority to request documents is dependent on whether it has a legitimate legislative purpose for the documents. The purpose of the House invoking the phrase “impeachment inquiry” is to create a pretext to argue in court that it has a right to the documents.

 

The White House brushed off many of Nadler’s requests in this May 15, 2019 letter denying the requests because Nadler had “not articulated any proper legislative purpose” for pursuing matters already investigated by Robert Mueller, for example. Because impeachment is one of the enumerated functions of the House, document requests relevant to an “impeachment inquiry” might be able to overcome this objection.

 

The strategy of declaring an “impeachment inquiry” actually has little or nothing to do with a serious effort to put a case in front of the Senate based upon existing wrongdoing. Rather, it calls to mind the technique used to snare so many victims of the get Trump movement: the process crime. Democrats want to force the president into defying a court order upholding a House document request in order to meet the Khanna test for a full-blown impeachment proceeding.

 

 

Impeachment was a scam from the start.

 
 
 
 
.
  • Thank you (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, B-Man said:

 

 

 How The House Plans To Use Its ‘Inquiry’ To Instigate Impeachment.

Congress’s authority to request documents is dependent on whether it has a legitimate legislative purpose for the documents. The purpose of the House invoking the phrase “impeachment inquiry” is to create a pretext to argue in court that it has a right to the documents.

 

The White House brushed off many of Nadler’s requests in this May 15, 2019 letter denying the requests because Nadler had “not articulated any proper legislative purpose” for pursuing matters already investigated by Robert Mueller, for example. Because impeachment is one of the enumerated functions of the House, document requests relevant to an “impeachment inquiry” might be able to overcome this objection.

 

The strategy of declaring an “impeachment inquiry” actually has little or nothing to do with a serious effort to put a case in front of the Senate based upon existing wrongdoing. Rather, it calls to mind the technique used to snare so many victims of the get Trump movement: the process crime. Democrats want to force the president into defying a court order upholding a House document request in order to meet the Khanna test for a full-blown impeachment proceeding.

 

 

Impeachment was a scam from the start.

 
 
 
 
.

No, Trump has been caught red handed in a crime. You pulling on your dick and screaming otherwise is dishonest and stupid. 

 

 

Red handed 

 

Image result for trump caught red handed
Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 minutes ago, B-Man said:
des·per·ate
/ˈdesp(ə)rət/
adjective
 
  1. feeling, showing, or involving a hopeless sense that a situation is so bad as to be impossible to deal with.
    "a desperate sadness enveloped Tiberius"
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
     

You want to see desperate, then look at the link below depicting all of the judges Trump has nominated and/or got confirmed. Don't tell HAHA Gator though, I don't think he's strong enough to handle the consequences of the loss of the Ninth Circuit.

 

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_federal_judges_appointed_by_Donald_Trump

  • Like (+1) 2
  • Thank you (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

32 minutes ago, B-Man said:

 

 

 How The House Plans To Use Its ‘Inquiry’ To Instigate Impeachment.

Congress’s authority to request documents is dependent on whether it has a legitimate legislative purpose for the documents.

 
 
 
 
.

 

Inaccurate.  Congress's investigation authority is extremely broad, and requests are presumed to have a legitimate legislative purpose until proven otherwise.

 

SCOTUS has ruled such in the past.  Reason being that otherwise it would make the legislative process beholden to, and subordinate to, the courts.

  • Thank you (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Tiberius said:

So Moscow Mitch could simply not have a trial in Senate. He can simply ignore the procedure 

 

 

As per usual, Gator/Tibsy is 180 degrees off.

 

I think that he got confused with the many dems saying that they are for impeachment, thinking that Sen. McConnell won't  follow through ,

 

Ohhhhhhhhhhh, on the contrary, they cannot hide behind that.

 

Reminder what Mitch has said in the past.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

,

Edited by B-Man
  • Like (+1) 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, B-Man said:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

.

 

Jesus.  That's not funny.  That's scary.  That's real Star-Chamber-Type stuff - they're usurping the courts' role in mediating disputes now.  They're really positioning themselves as the Assemblée Nationale.

  • Like (+1) 5
Link to comment
Share on other sites

52 minutes ago, B-Man said:

 

 

As per usual, Gator/Tibsy is 180 degrees off.

 

I think that he got confused with the many dems saying that they are for impeachment, thinking that Sen. McConnell won't  follow through ,

 

Ohhhhhhhhhhh, on the contrary, they cannot hide behind that.

 

Reminder what Mitch has said in the past.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

,

Well good, so glad you corrected that. :) 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

×
×
  • Create New...