Koko78 Posted July 13, 2019 Posted July 13, 2019 (edited) On 7/12/2019 at 11:32 PM, row_33 said: Who is planning to run against Trump in the Primaries Expand I will. If you vote for me, I promise a chicken in every pot, a car in every back yard, and I will reach across the aisle to work with the House leadership to land AOC and the Jihad Caucus on the moon... without space suits (or a functioning return vehicle)! Edited July 13, 2019 by Koko78 1
row_33 Posted July 13, 2019 Posted July 13, 2019 On 7/13/2019 at 2:17 PM, Koko78 said: I will. If you vote for me, I promise a chicken in every pot, a car in every back yard, and I will reach across the aisle to work with the House leadership to land AOC and the Jihad Caucus on the moon... without space suits (or a functioning return vehicle)! Expand Joe will cure cancer, so that is taken so we gotta cure death and resurrect anyone you want maybe promise to land a man or woman on the sun by 2030 1
Koko78 Posted July 13, 2019 Posted July 13, 2019 On 7/13/2019 at 4:29 PM, row_33 said: maybe promise to land a man or woman on the sun by 2030 Expand The problem with that is we can only attempt a solar landing during the day. 1
row_33 Posted July 13, 2019 Posted July 13, 2019 On 7/13/2019 at 4:42 PM, Koko78 said: The problem with that is we can only attempt a solar landing during the day. Expand Man o man.... back to the drawing board.
KRC Posted July 13, 2019 Posted July 13, 2019 On 7/13/2019 at 4:29 PM, row_33 said: maybe promise to land a man or woman on the sun by 2030 Expand Only binary gender identity? Excluding those who do not identify as a man or woman? You need to get woke.
row_33 Posted July 13, 2019 Posted July 13, 2019 On 7/13/2019 at 6:03 PM, KRC said: Only binary gender identity? Excluding those who do not identify as a man or woman? You need to get woke. Expand Getting disabused in all directions today... 1
SoCal Deek Posted July 14, 2019 Posted July 14, 2019 It’s interesting how the media has taken a break from impeachment for a while now. I know everyone is waiting for Mueller but even so, there was more run up to Trump’s Fourth of July speech. Is it possible the DNC has told them to back off? 1
Koko78 Posted July 14, 2019 Posted July 14, 2019 On 7/14/2019 at 12:19 PM, SoCal Deek said: It’s interesting how the media has taken a break from impeachment for a while now. I know everyone is waiting for Mueller but even so, there was more run up to Trump’s Fourth of July speech. Is it possible the DNC has told them to back off? Expand It's a losing argument, and their internal polls probably reflect that.
row_33 Posted July 14, 2019 Posted July 14, 2019 On 7/14/2019 at 1:09 PM, Koko78 said: It's a losing argument, and their internal polls probably reflect that. Expand Polls.... they can all suck it
Koko78 Posted July 14, 2019 Posted July 14, 2019 On 7/14/2019 at 3:52 PM, row_33 said: Polls.... they can all suck it Expand Well, Kamala Harris anyhow... 1 1
OldTimeAFLGuy Posted July 14, 2019 Posted July 14, 2019 On 7/12/2019 at 11:32 PM, row_33 said: Who is planning to run against Trump in the Primaries Expand ....I'd say dig up Strom Thurmond to level the possible playing field for Biden.............
Koko78 Posted July 14, 2019 Posted July 14, 2019 On 7/14/2019 at 4:22 PM, OldTimeAFLGuy said: ....I'd say dig up Strom Thurmond to level the possible playing field for Biden............. Expand At that debate, I'd wager Strom Thurmond's rotted corpse makes more intelligent points than Biden does. 1
Doc Brown Posted July 14, 2019 Posted July 14, 2019 On 6/12/2019 at 10:15 PM, Buffalo_Gal said: Expand After Benghazi obsession, they have no credibility. Spare me your faux outrage.
Deranged Rhino Posted July 14, 2019 Posted July 14, 2019 On 7/14/2019 at 6:37 PM, Doc Brown said: After Benghazi obsession, they have no credibility. Spare me your faux outrage. Expand Difference is one was a real event, with real death and government cover-up (of their illegal gun running program into Syria through Libya) -- while the other was fabricated by the previous administration to protect themselves from their own illegalities being exposed and to pull off a backdoor coup. One is not like the other. 4 1 1
Doc Brown Posted July 14, 2019 Posted July 14, 2019 On 7/14/2019 at 6:39 PM, Deranged Rhino said: Difference is one was a real event, with real death and government cover-up (of their illegal gun running program into Syria through Libya) -- while the other was fabricated by the previous administration to protect themselves from their own illegalities being exposed and to pull off a backdoor coup. One is not like the other. Expand They smelled blood and used the deaths as a political weapon instead of working together to make sure something like that never happens again. McCarthy let the cat out of the bag when describing Hillary's declining poll numbers due to the numerous GOP led Benghazi investigations. It actually worked too so maybe that's on the back of a lot of House Democrats minds who are calling for impeachment.
Deranged Rhino Posted July 14, 2019 Posted July 14, 2019 On 7/14/2019 at 7:05 PM, Doc Brown said: They smelled blood and used the deaths as a political weapon instead of working together to make sure something like that never happens again. McCarthy let the cat out of the bag when describing Hillary's declining poll numbers due to the numerous GOP led Benghazi investigations. It actually worked too so maybe that's on the back of a lot of House Democrats minds who are calling for impeachment. Expand They absolutely used it for partisan political purposes -- no denying that. But it doesn't change the fact that Benghazi was a real event, with a very real (likely) crime committed by the administration and a cover up of Americans' deaths (including an Ambassador). They deserved to be dragged over the coals -- and if the media wasn't covering for 44, it likely would have been much worse for the administration. The Russia Collusion/Conspiracy story was always fake. Still is. 2
Doc Brown Posted July 14, 2019 Posted July 14, 2019 On 7/14/2019 at 7:11 PM, Deranged Rhino said: They absolutely used it for partisan political purposes -- no denying that. But it doesn't change the fact that Benghazi was a real event, with a very real (likely) crime committed by the administration and a cover up of Americans' deaths (including an Ambassador). They deserved to be dragged over the coals -- and if the media wasn't covering for 44, it likely would have been much worse for the administration. The Russia Collusion/Conspiracy story was always fake. Still is. Expand Probably. I have no doubt the Dem Congress would pursue the Trump administration with the same vigor that Republicans did if the shoe was on the other foot when it came to Benghazi. I almost think we need a viable third party to help get rid of the us vs. them mentality that plagues our politics. 1
Wacka Posted July 15, 2019 Posted July 15, 2019 What about the straight-partisan support for impeachment? 1
1B4IDye Posted July 16, 2019 Posted July 16, 2019 On 7/16/2019 at 11:14 PM, Deranged Rhino said: Expand What will Nancy say about it? Too soon? 1 2
Recommended Posts