Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

The link is a BN column written by Mike Harrington. Although the title of the column listed Reinhart the body of the column dealt with the philosophy and style of play that Krueger is promoting. It points out that playing responsibly on the defensive end leads to offensive opportunities. Krueger's hockey philosophy is not complicated. It's basic and simple. It's all about giving effort and playing responsibly starting with the defensive side of the game.  

 

https://buffalonews.com/2019/10/06/buffalo-sabres-nhl-sam-reinhart/

Posted

Krueger reminds me of Belichick a bit.  Obviously he's not the same personality-wise but in his approach to success.  

 

I am so tired of hearing about talent (lack thereof).   

Posted
On 10/5/2019 at 9:37 PM, JohnC said:

What is dramatically different this year is that the team quickly gets the puck out of the defensive zone. They are playing a north/south game instead of dithering with the puck in their zone. There have been more successful stretch passes up the middle in the first two games of the season than there were all season last year. The addition of talent allows you to have the capability to execute plays. 

Nailed it.  They are putting 10x more pressure on their opponents this year.  No more letting the defense get set while they stage a canned breakout. 

 

The puck movement in transition, team defense, and sustained pressure in the offensive zone have all stood out.  Last year most of our scoring was a result of individual efforts from Eichel/Skinner.  We scored almost exclusively on the rush, not even odd man rushes which were few and far between.  Also noticeable is we are running 4 lines which all look like they can contribute.  Last year Housely ran the first line into the ground I thought.

 

 

  • Like (+1) 1
Posted
58 minutes ago, Jauronimo said:

Nailed it.  They are putting 10x more pressure on their opponents this year.  No more letting the defense get set while they stage a canned breakout. 

 

The puck movement in transition, team defense, and sustained pressure in the offensive zone have all stood out.  Last year most of our scoring was a result of individual efforts from Eichel/Skinner.  We scored almost exclusively on the rush, not even odd man rushes which were few and far between.  Also noticeable is we are running 4 lines which all look like they can contribute.  Last year Housely ran the first line into the ground I thought.

 

 

Housley had no choice because other than the first line there was no potency to the offense. What do you do when you don't have a credible second line? You play players in a higher position than they should be playing. As an example Okposo was incapable as a top two line player but as a fourth line player he is more than fulfilling his more appropriate role. You can say the same thing about all the lines and defensive pairings. 

 

No one is arguing that Housley comes close to matching Krueger as a coach. That would be an absurd position to take. But when a coach is working with a bereft of talent the plays that are now being executed were never going to be consistently executed because the players weren't good enough to execute them.

 

Entering this season there have been at least six players added to the roster. That is the major reason for the good start and better play. In this league success is mostly predicated on talent. That's the way it has always been and will continue to be.  

Posted
1 hour ago, Alaska Darin said:

Krueger reminds me of Belichick a bit.  Obviously he's not the same personality-wise but in his approach to success.  

 

I am so tired of hearing about talent (lack thereof).   

(I made this same  point in a response to Jauronimo.) This year's team is much more talented than last year's team. Vesey, Johansson, Miller, Olofsson, Jorki were additions that bolstered the roster. In addition, young players such as Dahlin and Mitts and others should be improved with the added experience. By adding more talent you are better placing the players in the roles that they should be playing. No one is arguing that Housley is a better coach than Krueger. But to be fair to Housley last year's team lacked adequate talent. What's apparent is that the GM did a good job this offseason in bringing in talent (nearly a half a dozen players) to bolster last year's obviously inadequate roster. 

Posted
On 10/5/2019 at 8:14 PM, Kelly the Dog said:

Olofsson is going to score 30 goals playing with Jack and Reinhart as well as the PP. That first PP is a killer group.

 

Totally different team under Krueger, plus the new guys make a huge difference. They're really fun to watch right now.

 

If he sticks on that line all year, it will pretty much make him a Calder finalist by default.  I can't picture 70+ games with Eichel leading to anything less than that.

Posted
1 hour ago, shrader said:

 

If he sticks on that line all year, it will pretty much make him a Calder finalist by default.  I can't picture 70+ games with Eichel leading to anything less than that.

The addition of Olofsson on the first line has a multiplier positive effect. Not only is his addition to the first Jack line maintaining its effectiveness but It also allowed Skinner to be moved to the second line. With the addition of Johansson a credible second line was created also benefiting the first line by taking some of the scoring pressure off of it.  

  • Like (+1) 1
Posted
18 minutes ago, JohnC said:

The addition of Olofsson on the first line has a multiplier positive effect. Not only is his addition to the first Jack line maintaining its effectiveness but It also allowed Skinner to be moved to the second line. With the addition of Johansson a credible second line was created also benefiting the first line by taking some of the scoring pressure off of it.  

 

That and they now have 5 incredibly accurate shots on that first PP unit.  They should finally get back to the first year or two of Eichel where the PP unit was near the top of the league.  They obviously fit that description on saturday.

  • Like (+1) 1
Posted
3 hours ago, GG said:

New talent on offense is a rookie and a Rangers washout.  

 

Yup.  Coaching means more in the NHL than in any other professional sport.  The Sabres have talent.

Posted
1 hour ago, shrader said:

 

That and they now have 5 incredibly accurate shots on that first PP unit.  They should finally get back to the first year or two of Eichel where the PP unit was near the top of the league.  They obviously fit that description on saturday.

In addition to your adroit comment the second PP unit isn't bad. And when Montour gets back, and with the addition of Miller, strong and accurate shots from the defensemen make our PP one of the better PP units in the league. 

Posted
3 hours ago, GG said:

New talent on offense is a rookie and a Rangers washout.  

Johansson was a terrific addition that helped in the rebuilding of a second line. And Miller not only is a good defenseman who meshes well with Dahlin but he also has a tremendous shot. And if you want you can consider Vesey a Ranger washout. However, that doesn't take away the from fact that he upgraded the talent base on the Sabres. Let's be clear here, adding talent doesn't diminish the importance of coaching and make our positions mutually exclusive. Both adding talent and better coaching can occur at the same time and result in better outcomes. 

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
×
×
  • Create New...