Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
53 minutes ago, Chef Jim said:

 

No, no it wasn't.  And if you think it is you're again not worth my time.  Later...........

Take your ball B word! 

Posted
13 hours ago, BigMcD said:

You are a moron. Trump is a moron. Makes sense. 

 

Makes sense because you, Fib and the Democratic Party as whole are nothing but a bunch of obstructionist braindead fvcking morons. 

 

That is all you nimrods will ever be and everyday you fartsniffers get exposed for the frauds you are.

 

Tell me I am wrong Sparky?

Posted
2 minutes ago, njbuff said:

 

Makes sense because you, Fib and the Democratic Party as whole are nothing but a bunch of obstructionist braindead fvcking morons. 

 

That is all you nimrods will ever be and everyday you fartsniffers get exposed for the frauds you are.

 

Tell me I am wrong Sparky?

Just because I think Trump is a moron, doesn’t make me a dem. I think you are a dicklicker, tell me I’m wrong Spanky. 

Posted

Thanks guys for making this a thoroughly unenjoyable place to hang out.  Why this place attracts guys in their 40's and older that feel that constant name calling is appropriate is beyond me.  

  • Like (+1) 1
  • Sad 1
  • Thank you (+1) 1
Posted
42 minutes ago, BigMcD said:

Just because I think Trump is a moron, doesn’t make me a dem. I think you are a dicklicker, tell me I’m wrong Spanky. 

 

Do I look like Pete Buttigeg?

Posted
4 hours ago, B-Man said:

 

 

 

Featured image......................JOE BIDEN FLIPS ON THE HYDE AMENDMENT

 

 

 

Yxbvmyt.jpg

 

oh man, only McGovern in 1972 was allowed to cynically use that image to scare up votes...

 

 

4 hours ago, Chef Jim said:

 

English please. 

 

that almost made sense to me....

 

sayin' a lot there...

 

 

Posted
36 minutes ago, row_33 said:

 

that almost made sense to me....

 

sayin' a lot there...

 

 

It made sense to me. That's why I knew it was improper English.  

Posted
14 minutes ago, Chef Jim said:

 

It made sense to me. That's why I knew it was improper English.  

 

you are one of the best on here, i can't stop laughing at that

 

Posted
2 hours ago, Chef Jim said:

Thanks guys for making this a thoroughly unenjoyable place to hang out.  Why this place attracts guys in their 40's and older that feel that constant name calling is appropriate is beyond me.  


Block 'em (ignore). It doesn't help when people quote the two or three largest offenders all the time **grumble**grumble**swear**swear** but it does help avoid at least half the stupid posted down here. 

  • Thank you (+1) 1
Posted
14 minutes ago, Buffalo_Gal said:


Block 'em (ignore). It doesn't help when people quote the two or three largest offenders all the time **grumble**grumble**swear**swear** but it does help avoid at least half the stupid posted down here. 

 

 

image.png.779e68f8d7a5087b4ced3df90e772f90.png

Posted (edited)
1 hour ago, Buffalo_Gal said:


Block 'em (ignore). It doesn't help when people quote the two or three largest offenders all the time **grumble**grumble**swear**swear** but it does help avoid at least half the stupid posted down here. 

 

I have never blocked anyone here and never thought I would but there are some on here that are just sadly pathetic.  

Edited by Chef Jim
Posted
1 minute ago, Chef Jim said:

 

I have never blocked anyone here and never thought I would be there are some on here that are just sadly pathetic.  


Well, you're a  better person than I am.

Posted (edited)

Same with me................I've never blocked anyone and I never will

 

I'm 64 years old, I have seen my share of childish, self-centered people, I don't need a "blocking device" to ignore their responses to me, it is easy.

 

I (of course) never respond directly to Gator, he simply is not mature enough, but I will still laugh and post about him.

 

But as Buffalo Gal has said, it is a waste of time to ask a question and expect a lucid answer, though many do it over and over.

 

But it's not just Tibsy, there are multiple posters who jump in, post something ridiculous, and then spend 2 or 3 pages trying to defend it, or (more often) deflect it.

 

 

I offer access to articles that they would otherwise never seek out, if they don't read any, that is their loss.

 

 

 

.

Edited by B-Man
  • Like (+1) 1
Posted
54 minutes ago, Chef Jim said:

 

I have never blocked anyone here and never thought I would be there are some on here that are just sadly pathetic.  

 

i have 30 active on ignore right now, for various issues, 3 of them are basically my fault

 

 

Posted
43 minutes ago, Buffalo_Gal said:


Well, you're a  better person than I am.

 

Don't feel bad.  I'm a better person that most everyone.  ?

19 minutes ago, B-Man said:

Same with me................I've never blocked anyone and I never will

 

I'm 64 years old, I have seen my share of childish, self-centered people, I don't need a "blocking device" to ignore their responses to me, it is easy.

 

I (of course) never respond directly to Gator, he simply is not mature enough, but I will still laugh and post about him.

 

But as Buffalo Gal has said, it is a waste of time to ask a question and expect a lucid answer, though many do it over and over.

 

But it's not just Tibsy, there are multiple posters who jump in, post something ridiculous, and then spend 2 or 3 pages trying to defend it, or (more often) deflect it.

 

 

I offer access to articles that they would otherwise never seek out, if they don't read any, that is their loss.

 

 

The only thing of value I took from this post is that I'm not the oldest dude here.  ?

  • Sad 1
  • Haha (+1) 1
Posted
13 minutes ago, Chef Jim said:

 

Don't feel bad.  I'm a better person that most everyone.  ?

 

where are those 3 little dots....

 

 

Posted
1 hour ago, Buffalo_Gal said:


Block 'em (ignore). It doesn't help when people quote the two or three largest offenders all the time **grumble**grumble**swear**swear** but it does help avoid at least half the stupid posted down here. 

 

and it is humorous reading thru a thread and seeing a string of 

You've chosen to ignore content by 

 

all in a row.  I call back to back ignores a "double", three in a row a "hat trick", four in a row a "grand slam", five in a row a "cinco"

 

Haven't achieved six in a row yet, but that would be a "touchdown".  "seven an extra point".  eight a "two point conversion"

  • Like (+1) 1
  • Haha (+1) 1
  • Awesome! (+1) 1
Posted
11 minutes ago, /dev/null said:

 

and it is humorous reading thru a thread and seeing a string of 

You've chosen to ignore content by 

 

all in a row.  I call back to back ignores a "double", three in a row a "hat trick", four in a row a "grand slam", five in a row a "cinco"

 

Haven't achieved six in a row yet, but that would be a "touchdown".  "seven an extra point".  eight a "two point conversion"

 

sextet for 6

 

  • Like (+1) 1
×
×
  • Create New...