Bockeye Posted April 14, 2020 Posted April 14, 2020 This is great - not a single Lib willing to step up to respond to these latest Biden accusations and how he has responded in the past. Where are you??? We know you’re watching. 2
Doc Posted April 14, 2020 Posted April 14, 2020 4 minutes ago, Bockeye said: This is great - not a single Lib willing to step up to respond to these latest Biden accusations and how he has responded in the past. Where are you??? We know you’re watching. Are you surprised? No one said anything when Hilly was trotting-out Slick to campaign for her, while calling Trump a misogynist. 2
B-Man Posted April 14, 2020 Posted April 14, 2020 IT CERTAINLY OUGHT TO: Biden’s Weakness on China Could Prove to Be His Downfall. “Biden has downplayed the economic threat from China for years. Not understanding the hazard the repressive Communist Party regime has for the world is a dereliction of duty, especially for a seasoned candidate who held a top position in the White House for two terms. Biden is either hopelessly outclassed or playing politics in a generational crisis. Both are certainly unacceptable in the world that we live in today.” FLASHBACK: 6 facts about Hunter Biden’s business dealings in China. In December 2013, Hunter landed in Beijing aboard Air Force Two, accompanying his father on an official visit to China. Less than two weeks later, Hunter’s company, Rosemont Seneca, became a partner in a new investment company backed by the state-owned Bank of China. Christening the new firm Bohai Harvest RST (BHR), the partners set out to raise $1 billion for the new fund. Representatives of the Biden family have denied any connection between the vice president’s visit and Hunter’s business. However, a BHR representative told The New Yorker earlier this year that Hunter used the opportunity to introduce his father to Chinese private equity executive Jonathan Li, who became CEO of BHR after the deal’s conclusion. It isn’t so much that Biden is weak on China than it is that he and his sole surviving son are inextricably intertwined with Beijing. . 1
Magox Posted April 14, 2020 Posted April 14, 2020 13 minutes ago, B-Man said: IT CERTAINLY OUGHT TO: Biden’s Weakness on China Could Prove to Be His Downfall. “Biden has downplayed the economic threat from China for years. Not understanding the hazard the repressive Communist Party regime has for the world is a dereliction of duty, especially for a seasoned candidate who held a top position in the White House for two terms. Biden is either hopelessly outclassed or playing politics in a generational crisis. Both are certainly unacceptable in the world that we live in today.” FLASHBACK: 6 facts about Hunter Biden’s business dealings in China. In December 2013, Hunter landed in Beijing aboard Air Force Two, accompanying his father on an official visit to China. Less than two weeks later, Hunter’s company, Rosemont Seneca, became a partner in a new investment company backed by the state-owned Bank of China. Christening the new firm Bohai Harvest RST (BHR), the partners set out to raise $1 billion for the new fund. Representatives of the Biden family have denied any connection between the vice president’s visit and Hunter’s business. However, a BHR representative told The New Yorker earlier this year that Hunter used the opportunity to introduce his father to Chinese private equity executive Jonathan Li, who became CEO of BHR after the deal’s conclusion. It isn’t so much that Biden is weak on China than it is that he and his sole surviving son are inextricably intertwined with Beijing. . Biden has a lot of vulnerabilities. A) The China issue is going to be huge. He is going to get hammered on how he supported bad trade deals such as NAFTA and TPP. His sons dealings with China. His unwillingness to take them to task. The China travel ban. This will be an ongoing and pummeling theme from now to election day. B) His mental acuity. Or lack thereof. Trump is going to hammer him on this. Trump is going to be seen as the one with a lot more stamina than Joe and I think that will be apparent to voters. C) His history of making bad decisions. Iraq war, Nafta, China travel ban, how he would have backed down on killing Osama when Obama decided to do it. D) Creepy Joe and this sexual assault. I would expect this wouldn't be an overarching theme, but targeted to females in suburban areas to depress voter turnout of those that would be inclined to choose him over Trump. E) HIs leftward lurch. His position being against fracking is gonna get him in lots of trouble in the parts of Pennsylvania. His positions on climate, taxes, energy, forgiving debt will scare some of the moderate right leaning suburban women who hate Trump, but don't like lefty positions either. F) Trump took this economy to new highs one time and he will make the case that "I did it once and I will do it again". That's a powerful argument. It's forward thinking. But to your point, the China one will be central to his case to being president. 4
Foxx Posted April 14, 2020 Posted April 14, 2020 29 minutes ago, Bockeye said: This is great - not a single Lib willing to step up to respond to these latest Biden accusations and how he has responded in the past. Where are you??? We know you’re watching. they are waiting for the talking points to be formulated. 2
ALF Posted April 14, 2020 Posted April 14, 2020 Lets see what the economy and budget deficit looks like in Nov
Tiberius Posted April 14, 2020 Posted April 14, 2020 41 minutes ago, Bockeye said: This is great - not a single Lib willing to step up to respond to these latest Biden accusations and how he has responded in the past. Where are you??? We know you’re watching. Yawn, we are going to be defending him for at least the next four years, so...
3rdnlng Posted April 14, 2020 Author Posted April 14, 2020 34 minutes ago, ALF said: Lets see what the economy and budget deficit looks like in Nov The narrative has changed regarding the economy. It's gone from Trump being able to say "look what I did for the economy" to being able to say "look what I can do again for the economy". MAKE ECONOMY GREAT AGAIN aka MEGA hats will be a popular seller. 2
Chef Jim Posted April 14, 2020 Posted April 14, 2020 1 hour ago, Tiberius said: Yawn, we are going to be defending him for at least the next four years, so... Is anyone saving these to trot out on November 4th. I wish I had been saving them. That would be one long ass post. 1
OldTimeAFLGuy Posted April 14, 2020 Posted April 14, 2020 37 minutes ago, Chef Jim said: Is anyone saving these to trot out on November 4th. I wish I had been saving them. That would be one long ass post. ...may have to wait....toilet paper is in short supply......BUT...WaPo and NY Times could be alternatives to TP.....SAME function............
Warcodered Posted April 15, 2020 Posted April 15, 2020 9 hours ago, B-Man said: Kind of weird to pull something he said in 2012. 9 hours ago, Bockeye said: This is great - not a single Lib willing to step up to respond to these latest Biden accusations and how he has responded in the past. Where are you??? We know you’re watching. “Women have a right to tell their story, and reporters have an obligation to rigorously vet those claims,” Kate Bedingfield said in a statement to HuffPost. “We encourage them to do so, because these accusations are false.” Seems about as reasonable a response as possible, ideally I'd rather not have a candidate with sexual assault allegations but we don't really have that opportunity on either side. Still if we're going to use this to decide I'd probably go with the guy with the single sexual assault allegation as opposed to the one with what 23 now. Also the one that doesn't have an audio recording of him bragging about doing the exact thing he's accused of.
Deranged Rhino Posted April 15, 2020 Posted April 15, 2020 45 minutes ago, Warcodered said: Seems about as reasonable a response as possible, ideally I'd rather not have a candidate with sexual assault allegations but we don't really have that opportunity on either side. Still if we're going to use this to decide I'd probably go with the guy with the single sexual assault allegation ... Joes got way more than one. Most on film. ********* “Progressives” are having none of Joe. https://mobile.twitter.com/CBSNews/status/1250242440407195649 No Chance Joe. 2
Warcodered Posted April 15, 2020 Posted April 15, 2020 23 minutes ago, Deranged Rhino said: Joes got way more than one. Most on film. ********* “Progressives” are having none of Joe. https://mobile.twitter.com/CBSNews/status/1250242440407195649 No Chance Joe. That's not really correct there are 7 women who stated he touched them in ways that made them feel uncomfortable and they felt was inappropriate and when further questioned after this accusation they didn't give any further allegations. Still I'd rather neither candidate have these kind of accusations but I wouldn't lean towards "Grab them by the *****" Trump as being the less likely predator.
billsfan1959 Posted April 15, 2020 Posted April 15, 2020 "I'm delighted to have the endorsement of my old friend, CornPop," he said as horrified aides attempted to cut off the footage. "You know, CornPop and me go way back. I used to work at the community pool. There were both poor kids and white kids, everyone getting along great. I was wearing a rubber chicken on my swim trunks, as was the style at the time. Sometimes the kids would run their fingers through my leg hair and I'd smack 'em with the rubber chicken and then they'd chase me and we'd all get pushed into the pool and really have a great laugh. It was around the summer of '42 I believe when CornPop came around -- a real bad dude. "Anyway, it's great to have CornPop's endorsement, and I know that working together, we can build a stronger Canada." 1 7
3rdnlng Posted April 15, 2020 Author Posted April 15, 2020 5 hours ago, Warcodered said: That's not really correct there are 7 women who stated he touched them in ways that made them feel uncomfortable and they felt was inappropriate and when further questioned after this accusation they didn't give any further allegations. Still I'd rather neither candidate have these kind of accusations but I wouldn't lean towards "Grab them by the *****" Trump as being the less likely predator. In Joe's defense, he just didn't know what he was doing. As proof, look back over the last 40 or so years. 1
Recommended Posts