Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
1 hour ago, KD in CA said:

 

Another minimally productive, wildly overrated player that somehow still holds fascination for Bills fans.

 

My fantasy is a day when the Bills never again have to put gadget players on the field in a futile attempt to overcome for not having good players.

 

....what's worse IF I'm correct, we paid him $5 mil in 2011 and $3.25 mil in 2012.....for the effin' "Puddycat"....go figure.....

Posted
2 hours ago, JohnBonhamRocks said:

 

His whole thing is that he only had a few carries per game. 

 

Actually....ONE carry per game.   Further evidence that his ypc average is meaningless and that he was one of the dumber signings in Bills history.

 

 

 

Posted (edited)
1 hour ago, KD in CA said:

 

Actually....ONE carry per game.   Further evidence that his ypc average is meaningless and that he was one of the dumber signings in Bills history.

 

 

 

And 2 total touchdowns/200 rushing yards over two SEASONS. There is absolutely no room on a roster for that kind of production. I don't love/hate the idea of a gadget guy, but Brad Smith is a very strange hill to die on. You gotta bring a WHOLE lot more production than that to make it a worthy debate. Pure silliness.

 

What about Tyree Jackson's skill set says gadget guy? He's fast (FOR A QUARTERBACK). Kind of like good looking for a politician. The guy is either a QB or a TE and chances are good he's neither. Strikes me as a really good kid, so I wish him well in life. It's probably not gonna be in the NFL.

 

THIS is how I'm spending my Saturday.:doh:

Edited by LSHMEAB
  • Haha (+1) 1
Posted
1 hour ago, KD in CA said:

 

Actually....ONE carry per game.   Further evidence that his ypc average is meaningless and that he was one of the dumber signings in Bills history.

 

 

 

 

It’s a gadget role, not the savior of the franchise.

×
×
  • Create New...