Freddie's Dead Posted May 10, 2019 Posted May 10, 2019 20 minutes ago, nucci said: why do you think he would make a good coach...plus I think our staff is set It was the whole rationale for keeping him around in the first place. Veteran mentor and all.
nucci Posted May 10, 2019 Posted May 10, 2019 1 minute ago, Freddie's Dead said: It was the whole rationale for keeping him around in the first place. Veteran mentor and all. No, Allen was injured and Peterman was awful. That's why he was brought in...
Thurman#1 Posted May 10, 2019 Posted May 10, 2019 That's a shame. He'd have helped Allen a lot. I don't think that Barkley is as effective at that role as Anderson was.
Patrick Duffy Posted May 10, 2019 Posted May 10, 2019 2 minutes ago, Thurman#1 said: That's a shame. He'd have helped Allen a lot. I don't think that Barkley is as effective at that role as Anderson was. Should be fine with Dorsey.
The Senator Posted May 10, 2019 Posted May 10, 2019 18 minutes ago, nucci said: No, Allen was injured and Peterman was awful. That's why he was brought in... Yes, then Peterman and Anderson were both awful, and we brought in Barkley. .
BUFFALOKIE Posted May 10, 2019 Posted May 10, 2019 (edited) 15 hours ago, ROCBillsBeliever said: 500 and change yards from #3 all-time in rushing yards, and he's going to retire? Do you think that kind of attitude is what got him to #4 all time? https://www.footballdb.com/leaders/career-rushing-yards Wow... Slowwwwwwww clap for you, @#34fan Wow. Emmitt is untouchable! I dont think his record will ever be broken. Even the next four too rushing records seem unlikely to ever be broken! AD and Shady would be next in line, and neither one of them are even close. Beyond that, nobody is even sniffing Frank Gore's jock! Edit to say that AD could conceivably achieve top 5 all time. He is getting close. Edited May 10, 2019 by BUFFALOKIE 1
Freddie's Dead Posted May 10, 2019 Posted May 10, 2019 31 minutes ago, nucci said: No, Allen was injured and Peterman was awful. That's why he was brought in... Right, but they signed him this year to be the crafty vet.
nucci Posted May 10, 2019 Posted May 10, 2019 1 minute ago, Freddie's Dead said: Right, but they signed him this year to be the crafty vet. nothing crafty about him 1
RobbRiddick Posted May 10, 2019 Posted May 10, 2019 Typical, I was all excited about signing our draft picks and then I get this devastating news
C.Biscuit97 Posted May 10, 2019 Posted May 10, 2019 Easily one of the greatest Bill ever. I can’t wait to see him get put on the Wall Of Fame. What a legend.
krf139 Posted May 10, 2019 Posted May 10, 2019 Very selfish move by Anderson. He should have never signed his contract extension if he didn't intend on playing. Obviously there would have been huge problems if he ever sniffed the field, but I still find it to be a selfish move to commit and then back off the commitment.
OldTimeAFLGuy Posted May 10, 2019 Posted May 10, 2019 4 minutes ago, krf139 said: Very selfish move by Anderson. He should have never signed his contract extension if he didn't intend on playing. Obviously there would have been huge problems if he ever sniffed the field, but I still find it to be a selfish move to commit and then back off the commitment. ...first he was a UFA...secondly his one year deal had a $90,000 signing bonus and only $90,000 guaranteed......his vet minimum salary becomes fully guaranteed week one.....so who did he screw and how?.......Jesus, McBeane pays the Rockpile Beerman more than 180 grand...............
krf139 Posted May 10, 2019 Posted May 10, 2019 10 minutes ago, OldTimeAFLGuy said: ...first he was a UFA...secondly his one year deal had a $90,000 signing bonus and only $90,000 guaranteed......his vet minimum salary becomes fully guaranteed week one.....so who did he screw and how?.......Jesus, McBeane pays the Rockpile Beerman more than 180 grand............... It's not about how much money he was scheduled to make or the impact on the team. It's BS for a guy to make a commitment and then retire. If he wanted to retire, he should have done so before signing the contract. Perhaps we could have even looked at bringing another veteran in.
OldTimeAFLGuy Posted May 10, 2019 Posted May 10, 2019 (edited) 9 minutes ago, krf139 said: It's not about how much money he was scheduled to make or the impact on the team. It's BS for a guy to make a commitment and then retire. If he wanted to retire, he should have done so before signing the contract. Perhaps we could have even looked at bringing another veteran in. Joe Buscaglia ✔ @JoeBuscaglia #Bills HC Sean McDermott on QB Derek Anderson's retirement: We knew about it as we started our offseason program. At the end of the day, we respect Derek's decision. He's been nothing but a joy to work with all the way back to my time in Carolina 34 11:20 AM - May 10, 2019 Edited May 10, 2019 by OldTimeAFLGuy
Rocky Landing Posted May 10, 2019 Posted May 10, 2019 6 minutes ago, krf139 said: It's not about how much money he was scheduled to make or the impact on the team. It's BS for a guy to make a commitment and then retire. If he wanted to retire, he should have done so before signing the contract. Perhaps we could have even looked at bringing another veteran in. Nothing BS about it. It’s a business.
krf139 Posted May 10, 2019 Posted May 10, 2019 10 minutes ago, OldTimeAFLGuy said: Joe Buscaglia ✔ @JoeBuscaglia #Bills HC Sean McDermott on QB Derek Anderson's retirement: We knew about it as we started our offseason program. At the end of the day, we respect Derek's decision. He's been nothing but a joy to work with all the way back to my time in Carolina 34 11:20 AM - May 10, 2019 Of course he's going to say the politically correct thing. Personally, I wouldn't accept a job and then back out of the job. I think it speaks to poor character and find it to be a BS move regardless of how it's spun.
nucci Posted May 10, 2019 Posted May 10, 2019 13 minutes ago, krf139 said: It's not about how much money he was scheduled to make or the impact on the team. It's BS for a guy to make a commitment and then retire. If he wanted to retire, he should have done so before signing the contract. Perhaps we could have even looked at bringing another veteran in. There are always bad 3rd string veteran QBs to bring in
krf139 Posted May 10, 2019 Posted May 10, 2019 Just now, krf139 said: Of course he's going to say the politically correct thing. Personally, I wouldn't accept a job and then back out of the job. I think it speaks to poor character and find it to be a BS move regardless of how it's spun. The clowns on WGR spent days talking about how great it will be to have Anderson back too. How misleading. 1 minute ago, nucci said: There are always bad 3rd string veteran QBs to bring in But nobody McD knows from Carolina!!
OldTimeAFLGuy Posted May 10, 2019 Posted May 10, 2019 1 minute ago, krf139 said: Of course he's going to say the politically correct thing. Personally, I wouldn't accept a job and then back out of the job. I think it speaks to poor character and find it to be a BS move regardless of how it's spun. ...and of course you know this to be correct.........give it up while you're ahead....SMH.......... 1
Recommended Posts