Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted (edited)
3 minutes ago, Joe in Winslow said:


Look, I love defense. I do. But this team needs OFFENSE more than anything else.

 

If they fail to come out of this draft with a quality WR, it's a fail, IMO.

 

 

No, the remainder of the draft can be great without a WR. It’s silly to think that the success or failure of an entire draft is dependent on one skill position. 

Edited by Jdragon2
  • Like (+1) 3
Posted
1 minute ago, GunnerBill said:

Bit earlier than I expected for Lawrence. Good pick though. 

I thought maybe he goes Lock, doubles down on QBs after all the grief he took last year for not taking one.....

Posted
1 minute ago, PromoTheRobot said:

 

I make mine from scratch.

 

Didn’t you drop a bunch of weight? I eat well, but good cookies are my kryptonite. 

Posted

Where’s the DK Metcalf Love right now. All in hiding apparently rn. Guess being jacked and running fast in a straight line isn’t the only evaluation 

  • Like (+1) 1
Posted

Snyder will undoubtedly insist that Haskins start immediately while Doug Williams and Gruden will probably want to break him in a bit behind McCoy and/or Keenum.  Snyder always likes to play with his new toys.  It will likely remain interesting in the House of Danny.

Posted
1 minute ago, Joe in Winslow said:


Look, I love defense. I do. But this team needs OFFENSE more than anything else.

 

If they fail to come out of this draft with a quality WR, it's a fail, IMO.

 

 

I think the DL was the biggest position of need going into the draft.  Still need an edge rusher.  After that, I'd like to see an OT and G.  I believe next year is loaded with WR, so Beane could be waiting for that.  

Posted
1 minute ago, Joe in Winslow said:

 

They picked up two grade-c WRs. They need a Grade-A target.

 

 

 

And there isn't one in this class. That does happen, you don't just force a pick because you need it.

  • Like (+1) 1
  • Thank you (+1) 1
Posted
1 minute ago, Jdragon2 said:

 

No, the remainder of the draft can be great without a WR. It’s silly to think that the success or failure of an entire draft is dependent on one skill position. 

 

I'll remind you of that if the offense flounders.

 

Posted
1 minute ago, Joe in Winslow said:

 

They picked up two grade-c WRs. They need a Grade-A target.

 

 

Maybe, but i don't think the Bills coaching staff feels this way.

They even said this offseason they don't feel the need for a #1 WR

Posted
17 minutes ago, hjnick said:

Want a WR, Metcalf would be cool.  Do not want TE if trade back in.  Get a TE in 3rd or 4th like ppl have said.  Texas A&M TE is good.

 

I would be happy if we got Fant

  • Like (+1) 1
Posted
5 minutes ago, Joe in Winslow said:

 

And just like that, the guy we shoulda taken will be gone.

 

Giants took Lawrence. Is he big enough for you? There's a reason DK is still not picked, he's not #9 worthy and I like him. Not at 9 though. 

Posted
Just now, Augie said:

 

Didn’t you drop a bunch of weight? I eat well, but good cookies are my kryptonite. 

 

I did. 110 calories each. I eat 1.

×
×
  • Create New...