Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

That’s a no from me dawg.

 

lots of amazing options at 9

 

in a perfect world we package some of the day 2 and day 3 picks for anoth high 1st or low 2nd.

 

 

9 is a great spot this year imo

  • Like (+1) 1
Posted
1 minute ago, Gugny said:

 

What was JoPar_v1 like?

 

Don’t get salty with me for calling a spade a spade. I’m not the one who shut that stupid, unnecessary thread down. 

Posted

Unh uh!

 

No!

 

Beane has done a masterful job in free agency.  Stay at nine unless a team makes a drop dead, top of the heap, Wow I didn't see it coming offer.  Even then, hold out for more....

Posted
4 minutes ago, JoPar_v2 said:

 

Don’t get salty with me for calling a spade a spade. I’m not the one who shut that stupid, unnecessary thread down. 

 

I don't know what you're talking about.  I thought the v2 must mean there was a v1 and I'm wondering what changed.

Posted

No thanks.  It's tempting to be able to guarantee either Williams or Oliver but Dawkins is one of our  starting tackles.  Right now he is the LT but depending on how the draft goes he might be moved to RT.    Q.Williams, Oliver, Jonah Williams, Dilliard, Hockenson or trade down.  That's what I would do.  

Posted

Man we really need to get this draft over with.. so many “creative” ideas.. They are trying to develop and retain talent at this point not firesale it. There’s zero guarantees you hit on pick 5, definitely zero guarantees you’re getting a tackle of Dawkins caliber past round 1 regardless of what some may think. He may not be elite after last season but Dawkins is quite good and hasn’t peaked yet why get rid of him while he’s on a rookie contract? 

  • Like (+1) 2
  • Thank you (+1) 1
Posted

Idk how people come up with this stuff. Our Oline was one of the biggest issues last year & we've been working to upgrade it all offseason, because you know, we have a young QB & wish to protect him. So we take one of our brightest young tackles in Dawkins & trade him along with our #9 draft pick for a DT for which this draft class has lots of depth with.

It makes no sense. Trade 2 assets which are very valuable in Dawkins & #9, for a DT in which if we just picked the next BPA at DT we'd be getting a good player anyways.

This idea would seem to hurt the team more than help it imo.

Posted
47 minutes ago, Rc2catch said:

Man we really need to get this draft over with.. so many “creative” ideas.. They are trying to develop and retain talent at this point not firesale it. There’s zero guarantees you hit on pick 5, definitely zero guarantees you’re getting a tackle of Dawkins caliber past round 1 regardless of what some may think. He may not be elite after last season but Dawkins is quite good and hasn’t peaked yet why get rid of him while he’s on a rookie contract? 

When you say creative do you mean stupid?

Posted

 

Absolutely no.  If you’re moving up to 5th you’re obviously not drafting Jonah Williams, so all you achieve is creating a big hole in the O-line and dumping a promising young guy who makes $845K this season, who you already know, for an unknown rookie. In a draft rich with DT talent.

.

  • Like (+1) 1
×
×
  • Create New...