FeelingOnYouboty Posted April 23, 2019 Posted April 23, 2019 Giving up a future 1st for a non QB <<<<<<
formerlyofCtown Posted April 23, 2019 Posted April 23, 2019 2 hours ago, stosh64 said: I love this idea, I'm curious what you guys think of it. NFL.com Too pricey. 1 hour ago, Putin said: This ^^^ there is NO way we are giving up 2 first round picks for a DT , especially nexts years we don’t know how this season will turn out injuries / anything can happen our first round pick could be in the top 5-10 , now if we had two first round picks this year and BOTH in the mid 20’s then it’s a different story, If it was just 2 first I might not cringe.
Alphadawg7 Posted April 23, 2019 Posted April 23, 2019 (edited) Funny, this would be one of the only ways I could stomach a trade up...where we keep our 2nd and 3rd this year. Im better trading next years 1st over this years 2nd personally. I think this its too important of a draft and too deep as positions we should be pursuing to gut it for one guy. That being said, I still think there is very little chance we trade up from 9 but instead trade up at other spots in the draft. I do think a trade down is quite possible from 9 still though, especially if Raiders surprise with a QB at 4 and makes the QB needy teams antsy behind us Edited April 23, 2019 by Alphadawg7 1 1
buffaloaggie Posted April 23, 2019 Posted April 23, 2019 Defensive Tackle probably has the most depth in this draft. A trade up for Williams would smell like trading up for Sammy Watkins, with Mike Evans, OBJ and Jarvis Landry still on the board. OBJ and Landry were available at our original spot. Plenty of DTs available. You do not trade up for one. 1 2
MacGyver Posted April 23, 2019 Posted April 23, 2019 I'm not cool at all with trading up, just stop it! 1 2
Bill from NYC Posted April 23, 2019 Posted April 23, 2019 2 hours ago, oldmanfan said: I do not see any circumstance where Beane gives up a first round pick in 2020. I sincerely hope that you are correct. That draft will be chock full of wide receivers. I have probably seen every play of Quinnen's career. The kid can play, and he is a seemingly wonderful kid. Do I think that he is a legit #2? He might be, but not for the Bills to give up a 1st in 2020. I would rather trade down and get another one for that matter. And btw, call me crazy but I think that there is a 10% or so chance that we can get him at #9. 1
Last Guy on the Bench Posted April 23, 2019 Posted April 23, 2019 Guess I'm in the minority, but I would do it. Love that guy. People put way too much stock in first rounders. Half of them aren't that great. (More than half of ours, historically.) I get the argument that you'd be trading two for one for a guy who also might not be that great, but if you believe in him, do it. We need a few superstars. Take a big swing now and then for the right guy. I think Williams might be that guy. And obviously if they made a trade like this they would agree. 3
IgotBILLStopay Posted April 23, 2019 Posted April 23, 2019 I have been sold on Q. WIlliams longer than most (since his LSU game) and think he is the best player in the draft - but even I wouldnt give up next year's first rounder to get him. 1 1
Figster Posted April 23, 2019 Posted April 23, 2019 (edited) I'm game If Mcbeane and company are game because my trust in the process has grown leaps and bounds. Buffalo's criteria for a move like this would be well thought out and the player deemed a good fit IMO. Like Cleveland I feel the Buffalo Bills are gearing to make a serious push for a championship. Edited April 23, 2019 by Figster 1
Bakin Posted April 23, 2019 Posted April 23, 2019 TERRIBLE idea... I like Q - he's a nice player....but I am NOT giving up any of next years' draft capital.
15k-#25 Posted April 23, 2019 Posted April 23, 2019 I really hope they wouldn’t consider moving next years first. Beane has put the Bills in a position to draft the BPA this season. Let the board fall you to you, he has stated how much he values building a team threw the draft. Fill your holes in free agency, get your franchise corner stones VIA draft. So many different possibilities at 9. Sit back and enjoy picks 1-8! 1
Figster Posted April 23, 2019 Posted April 23, 2019 15 minutes ago, Last Guy on the Bench said: Guess I'm in the minority, but I would do it. Love that guy. People put way too much stock in first rounders. Half of them aren't that great. (More than half of ours, historically.) I get the argument that you'd be trading two for one for a guy who also might not be that great, but if you believe in him, do it. We need a few superstars. Take a big swing now and then for the right guy. I think Williams might be that guy. And obviously if they made a trade like this they would agree. I like the way you think 2
foreboding Posted April 23, 2019 Posted April 23, 2019 Trade a future first for a non-qb?? I think that is a draft recipe for disaster. I pray this is soooo wrong.
NewEra Posted April 23, 2019 Posted April 23, 2019 He’s the #1 guy on my board, so I’d actually be ok with this based on talent and fit. My only fear would be his Alabama connections with Marcel. I’m quite sure Marcel would have nothing but negativity to say about our team. Could that affect Quinnens play and resigning him going forward? Kind of silly, but in today world, it’s something to think about....especially when giving up a future 1st
.thumb.jpg.d4ba76cf4232eba0241277bce346c401.jpg)
Recommended Posts