BillsFan17 Posted April 22, 2019 Posted April 22, 2019 Depends how much people wanna read the tea leaves on what Murphy truly knows.
NickelCity Posted April 22, 2019 Posted April 22, 2019 He was dead on about Allen, for sure. I'd take Hock over Jonah, so I'll hope Murph is wrong here lol. 1
golfball323 Posted April 22, 2019 Posted April 22, 2019 Personally I think it's time for Murph to move on. Might just be me but I'm getting a "too big for his britches" feeling from listening to him lately... Maybe I'm just getting old
JM57 Posted April 22, 2019 Posted April 22, 2019 Disappointing to hear that coming from Bills State Radio.
C.Biscuit97 Posted April 22, 2019 Posted April 22, 2019 I don’t know a ton about TJ. However, IMo, it is a lot harder to find a game changing TE than a Jonah Williams. We neglect TE almost as much as QB. Would be nice to have a big mismatch who can help out with blocking for a change. 7
John from Riverside Posted April 22, 2019 Posted April 22, 2019 Might be pushing mis information so that Hock falls to us? 2 1 1
LABILLBACKER Posted April 22, 2019 Posted April 22, 2019 4 minutes ago, C.Biscuit97 said: I don’t know a ton about TJ. However, IMo, it is a lot harder to find a game changing TE than a Jonah Williams. We neglect TE almost as much as QB. Would be nice to have a big mismatch who can help out with blocking for a change. The Bills organization has NEVER had a dynamic TE in their history. I think it's time for that to change. 7
Reed83HOF Posted April 22, 2019 Author Posted April 22, 2019 1 minute ago, LABILLBACKER said: The Bills organization has NEVER had a dynamic TE in their history. I think it's time for that to change. Especially in this day and age. 1
C.Biscuit97 Posted April 22, 2019 Posted April 22, 2019 1 minute ago, LABILLBACKER said: The Bills organization has NEVER had a dynamic TE in their history. I think it's time for that to change. How dare you forget about the great Lee Smith? what I don’t get is why don’t bad teams copy what good teams do. The Pats constantly spend picks on TEs and sign FA TEs. That’s why I liked the Clay signing. It was at least an effort. When you have a young qb, you need a big target in the middle of field. I really like Beasley but he wasn’t as effective without Witten. 1
YoloinOhio Posted April 22, 2019 Posted April 22, 2019 (edited) 15 minutes ago, Reed83HOF said: I have to call BS on whoever it was that tweeted that. He was not talking up Allen last year at all. Tasker even less so. Btw he’s been all in on metcalf this year Edited April 22, 2019 by YoloinOhio 1
wppete Posted April 22, 2019 Posted April 22, 2019 Smoke Screens everywhere this week. Dont believe a thing anyone says. 1
Logic Posted April 22, 2019 Posted April 22, 2019 I like Hock a lot, but for what it's worth, Noah Fant had TWICE as many receiving touchdowns over the last two seasons as Hock. Hock -- 9. Fant -- 18 (!).
JM57 Posted April 22, 2019 Posted April 22, 2019 5 minutes ago, Logic said: I like Hock a lot, but for what it's worth, Noah Fant had TWICE as many receiving touchdowns over the last two seasons as Hock. Hock -- 9. Fant -- 18 (!). It's worth little other than knowing that the Iowa QB seemed to look Fant's way in the end zone. Other than TD their stats are very close. Fant: 78 for 1083 yards (13.9 average) and 19 TD when his limited freshman action is included Hock: 73 for 1080 (14.8 average) and 9 TD.
mrags Posted April 22, 2019 Posted April 22, 2019 24 minutes ago, golfball323 said: Personally I think it's time for Murph to move on. Might just be me but I'm getting a "too big for his britches" feeling from listening to him lately... Maybe I'm just getting old This. Not to mention he’s just a fat stupid idiot that has no idea what he’s talking about. He was right in the Allen thing. No crap. So we’re a million other idiots that generally don’t have a clue. But it’s not hard to figure out. 1
Buffalo716 Posted April 22, 2019 Posted April 22, 2019 I’m not taking any TE this year top 10... and it would be really hard to do unless he is 100% HoF worthy Hock isn’t Gronk or Gates so I just cant justify it that early 4 1
mrags Posted April 22, 2019 Posted April 22, 2019 (edited) 3 minutes ago, JM57 said: It's worth little other than knowing that the Iowa QB seemed to look Fant's way in the end zone. Other than TD their stats are very close. Fant: 78 for 1083 yards (13.9 average) and 19 TD when his limited freshman action is included Hock: 73 for 1080 (14.8 average) and 9 TD. Fwiw, I’d probably take Fant all day over Hock. Both will be good. Fant has the potential to be generational. Shockey, Gates, Gronk. Hock doesn’t have that. And the reason why Fant had more TDS is because he’s a bigger target. More physical. Which is exactly what we need. Edited April 22, 2019 by mrags 1
C.Biscuit97 Posted April 22, 2019 Posted April 22, 2019 7 minutes ago, Coach Tuesday said: Was Brian Bulaga worth a #9? That’s such a great question. I was on the Bulaga train before his draft. I think he’s a solid RT when he plays but he’s always hurt. But when you look back at that draft, there were so many bigger impact players than a solid RT. But you need to invest in your franchise qb. Great question. obviously, there are many factors at play but I would like a franchise changing player in the top 10 - Qb, pass rusher, play maker. 1
Logic Posted April 22, 2019 Posted April 22, 2019 3 minutes ago, JM57 said: It's worth little other than knowing that the Iowa QB seemed to look Fant's way in the end zone. Other than TD their stats are very close. Fant: 78 for 1083 yards (13.9 average) and 19 TD when his limited freshman action is included Hock: 73 for 1080 (14.8 average) and 9 TD. Agree to disagree. When one player at the same position, playing in the same offense has DOUBLE the touchdowns of the other player, I think it's significant. YOU say "the Iowa QB seemed to look Fant's way in the end zone". I could just easily say "the Iowa QB looked Fant's way in the end zone because Fant was better at getting open".
Recommended Posts