Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

Assuming you don’t have a player you must take at 9 that’s available. 

 

In exchange for Bills #9

Raiders give 24, 35 and 2020 2nd round pick. 

 

 

  • Like (+1) 1
Posted

Yes.  #24 and #35 alone are almost worth #9.   The 2020 pick is gravy.

 

Then package something to get back into the top half of round one.

  • Like (+1) 7
Posted
37 minutes ago, maryland-bills-fan said:

No.  Beane and I want to see impact players from the top of the draft.  I would not move down lower than 16. (don't ask why 16).

That's kind of where I'm at right now.  We need impact players, especially on the DLine. We have enough picks to add quality later.

  • Like (+1) 3
Posted (edited)

I'd rather make this trade with the Raiders:  Bills #1 & #2 to Raiders for pick #4.  Then Beane will have a shot at at least one of the 3 that is left among Bosa, Williams, Allen.  

Why would we want the Raiders 1st round garbage when we can get the Raiders 1st round treasure?  

 

 

Edited by Albany,n.y.
  • Like (+1) 4
Posted
1 hour ago, Bakin said:

Assuming you don’t have a player you must take at 9 that’s available. 

 

In exchange for Bills #9

Raiders give 24, 35 and 2020 2nd round pick. 

 

 

Fiwi, people are already complaining we have too many draft picks...

Posted
1 minute ago, gobills1212 said:

Fiwi, people are already complaining we have too many draft picks...

 

We would then package them and picks in rounds 4-7 to get multiple picks in rounds 1-3

  • Like (+1) 1
Posted (edited)
3 hours ago, Bakin said:

Assuming you don’t have a player you must take at 9 that’s available. 

 

In exchange for Bills #9

Raiders give 24, 35 and 2020 2nd round pick. 

 

 

No. I'd make it if it was a 2020 first rounder and I dont mind giving a 4th rounder back from this year. Also a function of who is left at #9. I still would not do it if Ed Oliver (or Q,) were to be available.

Edited by IgotBILLStopay
Posted

No. That is too far.

Drop no further than 15 and make sure at least one of the following guys will be there at 15

Hockenson

Fant

Sweat

Oliver

Taylor

Metcalf

Another top OT

 

If more than 1 of the above is gone by 8 and the team swapping picks doesn't want a QB then sit tight at 9 and take Oliver, Hock, or Fant

Posted
4 hours ago, Virgil said:

 

We would then package them and picks in rounds 4-7 to get multiple picks in rounds 1-3

Youd hope, but this dream senerio certainly didnt seem to get that far..

Posted

Not for 24 and their 2nd rounder. But I’d do it for their 2 late round firsts. 24 and 27. I’d take a 3rd this year instead of a 2nd next year. And I would run up to the podium to announce the trade. 

Posted (edited)

No. Don’t care about point value being close.

The difference in players from 9 to 24 in this draft is great. If marginal you make that trade.

Its not marginal and not a good trade.

Edited by dlonce
  • Like (+1) 1
Posted
10 hours ago, Lurker said:

Yes.  #24 and #35 alone are almost worth #9.   The 2020 pick is gravy.

 

Then package something to get back into the top half of round one.

 

Worth it for the future but not for the present imo

 

i want the picks for this draft. It’s very deep in areas of need imo.

 

we need to come out of the first/2nd rounds with a TE WR and DT ideally.

 

 

×
×
  • Create New...