\GoBillsInDallas/ Posted April 15, 2019 Posted April 15, 2019 https://fox17online.com/2019/04/12/man-sues-parents-over-trashed-porn-collection/
bdutton Posted April 15, 2019 Posted April 15, 2019 Kid has a case. Porn is protected by the 1st amendment.
Koko78 Posted April 15, 2019 Posted April 15, 2019 Quote Charlie says his parents told him that they destroyed the entire collection. A collection that consisted of over 12 moving boxes full of movies. ... The Ottawa County Sheriff's Office was eventually called about the destroyed items. Charlie filed a police report estimating the value of his collection to be $28,940.72. Here's a picture of the guy:
Shamrock Posted April 16, 2019 Posted April 16, 2019 Hard to return comment when you’ve tied yourself up in a gimp suit and enjoying Mrs Palmers company. Wonder why his wife left, he seems completely normal? That said, there’s a guy who’s a friend of a mate of mine- actually their wife’s are, that collected Dr Who episodes. He has an original 1st recording that apparently not even the BBC had. Made some $ from it. is porn comparable to Dr. Who lost tapes? I suspect having met his wife, he’d trade some tapes with that other guy.
WhoTom Posted April 16, 2019 Posted April 16, 2019 23 hours ago, bdutton said: Kid has a case. Porn is protected by the 1st amendment. That just means you can't be arrested for owning porn. It doesn't mean your parents can't throw it away. 1
bdutton Posted April 16, 2019 Posted April 16, 2019 57 minutes ago, WhoTom said: That just means you can't be arrested for owning porn. It doesn't mean your parents can't throw it away. He was an adult at the time. He has a reasonable expectation that his property is his, regardless of his parent's inclinations.
KD in CA Posted April 16, 2019 Posted April 16, 2019 7 minutes ago, bdutton said: He was an adult at the time. He has a reasonable expectation that his property is his, regardless of his parent's inclinations. Property that he left in their house after he moved out?
RaoulDuke79 Posted April 16, 2019 Posted April 16, 2019 I thought movies went the way of the albatross once the internet perfected porn in 7 minute clips.
bdutton Posted April 16, 2019 Posted April 16, 2019 56 minutes ago, KD in CA said: Property that he left in their house after he moved out? The story implies that they had an agreement to move his property to his new place in Indiana.
KD in CA Posted April 16, 2019 Posted April 16, 2019 2 minutes ago, bdutton said: The story implies that they had an agreement to move his property to his new place in Indiana. An agreement?? Riiiight. I'm sure he was fully compensating them for storage and delivering his belongings, just like he had fully compensated them for staying in their house. The 'story' was nothing more than a recap of the loser's lawyer's laughably absurd accusations.
bdutton Posted April 16, 2019 Posted April 16, 2019 5 minutes ago, KD in CA said: An agreement?? Riiiight. I'm sure he was fully compensating them for storage and delivering his belongings, just like he had fully compensated them for staying in their house. The 'story' was nothing more than a recap of the loser's lawyer's laughably absurd accusations. It was his property. What if it was guns (secured and locked for argument sake). What if the parents were anti gun liberals and decided to turn the guns into the police instead of returning them to him when he moved as they had already agreed to.
Lurker Posted April 16, 2019 Posted April 16, 2019 On 4/15/2019 at 3:47 PM, Koko78 said: Here's a picture of the guy: More likely, he looks like this...
WhoTom Posted April 16, 2019 Posted April 16, 2019 (edited) 2 hours ago, bdutton said: The story implies that they had an agreement to move his property to his new place in Indiana. I was responding to the statement about the First Amendment. I just said that it's not a First Amendment issue. But if you want to bring up the agreement, this was also in the article: Quote Charlie's father said in one email that his son was allegedly kicked out of high school and college for selling porn to other students. Saying in the documents, "I also warned you at that time if I ever found pornography in my house again, I would destroy it." Edited April 16, 2019 by WhoTom
KD in CA Posted April 17, 2019 Posted April 17, 2019 23 hours ago, bdutton said: It was his property. What if it was guns (secured and locked for argument sake). What if the parents were anti gun liberals and decided to turn the guns into the police instead of returning them to him when he moved as they had already agreed to. And he abandoned his property. I’m not following your logic that a parent and/or landlord has an obligation to store someone’s crap after the person moves out. Quite obviously there was no ‘agreement’ to store this property. Doesn’t matter if it’s porn, guns or Cheetos.
Recommended Posts