Rc2catch Posted April 14, 2019 Posted April 14, 2019 1 hour ago, Joe in Winslow said: I stopped at PFF I agree there. People are putting too much stock into this stat recording
mjpbills Posted April 14, 2019 Posted April 14, 2019 3 hours ago, Dr.Sack said: Surprised not to see Nathan Peterman on that top 3. He completed a high % of his passes, very accurate & anticipation. I do not think it counts when he throws it to the other team
SoTier Posted April 15, 2019 Posted April 15, 2019 1 hour ago, IgotBILLStopay said: We did play weaker opposition (except the NE game) the last 7 games. That said, Wallace, Foster and JA did impress in those games. 1 hour ago, Bills2ref said: Well, they have to grade him on the games he played in, no? They can’t project him falling back down to earth and use that in the PFF grades for the games he’s actually played in. Their criteria/methodology is flawed plain and simple. How can they realistically evaluate rookies who have not played even 1 complete NFL season against + veterans who have 3 or 4 seasons of experience? Rookies shouldn't be included, plain and simply. The history of the NFL is littered with great looking rookies who crashed and burned in subsequent seasons as well as rookies who sucked in their first season and turned into All Stars -- or like Brady and Mahomes, barely played but had extraordinary success as sophomores.
PetermansRedemption Posted April 15, 2019 Posted April 15, 2019 26 minutes ago, SoTier said: Their criteria/methodology is flawed plain and simple. How can they realistically evaluate rookies who have not played even 1 complete NFL season against + veterans who have 3 or 4 seasons of experience? Rookies shouldn't be included, plain and simply. The history of the NFL is littered with great looking rookies who crashed and burned in subsequent seasons as well as rookies who sucked in their first season and turned into All Stars -- or like Brady and Mahomes, barely played but had extraordinary success as sophomores. But their method isn’t to project for you players who may play well in the future. They are there to evaluate players in games they have played. If a 3-4 year veteran outplays that rookie in the 8 games he played in that season then he will be ranked higher.
berg1029 Posted April 15, 2019 Posted April 15, 2019 well, at least we are good at picking cornerbacks. or maybe it is that we are good at training cornerbacks. either way. we are good at doing something with cornerbacks 1
MJS Posted April 15, 2019 Posted April 15, 2019 (edited) 21 minutes ago, berg1029 said: well, at least we are good at picking cornerbacks. or maybe it is that we are good at training cornerbacks. either way. we are good at doing something with cornerbacks Maybe PFF over grades them. I mean, Matt Milano has been an awesome draft pick. Why is he not graded higher than Shaq Lawson? Tough to believe that they grade all position groups on the exact same scale. Anybody know what Milano's grades have been? Edited April 15, 2019 by MJS 1
BillyWhiteShows Posted April 15, 2019 Author Posted April 15, 2019 7 hours ago, MJS said: Maybe PFF over grades them. I mean, Matt Milano has been an awesome draft pick. Why is he not graded higher than Shaq Lawson? Tough to believe that they grade all position groups on the exact same scale. Anybody know what Milano's grades have been? Because that graphic is showing the highest rated player from each draft class over the past 4 years. Milano’s ranking isn’t higher than White’s 80.6
MJS Posted April 15, 2019 Posted April 15, 2019 2 hours ago, BillyWhiteShows said: Because that graphic is showing the highest rated player from each draft class over the past 4 years. Milano’s ranking isn’t higher than White’s 80.6 Oh, they are only showing the highest graded from each draft class, not the highest rated 4 players. Ok.
Recommended Posts