GG Posted December 5, 2019 Posted December 5, 2019 2 minutes ago, DC Tom said: Nothing happened. It was all magic and special effects. The World Trade Center is still there. WAKE UP SHEEPLE!!!!! WTC7 was the first one to be rebuilt. Chew on that for a moment. If that doesn't scream conspiracy, nothing else will.
3rdnlng Posted December 5, 2019 Posted December 5, 2019 4 hours ago, John Adams said: What really happened on 9-11 and who was behind it? Dance for me, dance I say! Were you born a prick or did you have to work at it?
Foxx Posted December 5, 2019 Posted December 5, 2019 12 minutes ago, 3rdnlng said: Were you born a prick or did you have to work at it? it's his default go to when his paradigm is being threatened. 2
John Adams Posted December 5, 2019 Posted December 5, 2019 26 minutes ago, 3rdnlng said: Were you born a prick or did you have to work at it? Sorry pookie-bear. I'll be more gentle with you.
DC Tom Posted December 5, 2019 Posted December 5, 2019 7 minutes ago, John Adams said: Sorry pookie-bear. I'll be more gentle with you. Just tell him you worked at it. Show some pride in your accomplishments.
3rdnlng Posted December 5, 2019 Posted December 5, 2019 John Adams: Your posts here are muddled and confusing. Many posters here misunderstand you and when you get called out on them you have to explain what you meant. You also are a 2nd rate prick. You claim to be a lawyer and that may be true, but one thing for sure is that you are not a trial lawyer. Your MO is such that you would piss off both the judge and jury to the extent that you could never win a case. You must be shoved off in the corner and not allowed to associate with others at work. I bet you spent half of elementary school in the coat room. You are what is commonly called a fvcking jerk.
Deranged Rhino Posted December 5, 2019 Posted December 5, 2019 Hear that? That's the sound of an impending mental breakdown of one(several) posters. 4 1
Warren Zevon Posted December 5, 2019 Posted December 5, 2019 Just now, Deranged Rhino said: Hear that? That's the sound of an impending mental breakdown of one(several) posters. Brennan is toast - throw him in the slammer
Deranged Rhino Posted December 5, 2019 Posted December 5, 2019 https://oig.justice.gov/semiannual/1911.pdf 2
Buffalo_Gal Posted December 5, 2019 Posted December 5, 2019 16 minutes ago, Deranged Rhino said: Hear that? That's the sound of an impending mental breakdown of one(several) posters. This cannot be true!! The WSJ and the NYT told me nothing was going to happen! The upcoming OIG report is a big nothing-burger, or so I heard from "well placed sources." 2 2
Deranged Rhino Posted December 5, 2019 Posted December 5, 2019 Just now, Buffalo_Gal said: This cannot be true!! The WSJ and the NYT told me nothing was going to happen! The upcoming OIG report is a big nothing-burger, or so I heard from "well placed sources." I know! So strange. 1
B-Man Posted December 5, 2019 Posted December 5, 2019 WHY IT’S FAIR TO TALK ABOUT A “COUP:” ‘ The Interagency’ Isn’t Supposed to Rule: The Constitution gives the president, not a club of unelected officials, the power to set foreign policy. When the war on terror opened, with all the secret activity it required, professional cadres in the diplomatic corps, the military and the nation’s many intelligence agencies were able to transform interagency cooperative agreements that had existed since the Cold War into a de facto agency—a largely informal and virtual bureaucracy—with the assumed power, if need be, to determine and execute a foreign policy at odds with the intent of the president and Congress. Last month’s testimony before the Intelligence Committee shed light on this club whose members are a permanent shadow government credentialed by family histories, elite schools and unique career experiences. This common pedigree informs their perspective of how America should relate to the world. The dogmatists of the interagency seem to share a common discomfort with a president who probably couldn’t describe the doctrine of soft power, doesn’t desire to be the center of attention at Davos, and wouldn’t know that Francis Fukuyama once decided that history was over. The impeachment hearings will have served a useful purpose if all they do is demonstrate that a cabal of unelected officials are fashioning profound aspects of U.S. foreign policy on their own motion. No statutes anticipate that the president or Congress will delegate such authority to a secret working group formed largely at the initiation of entrepreneurial bureaucrats, notwithstanding that they may be area experts, experienced in diplomatic and military affairs, and motivated by what they see as the best interests of the country. Given their track record, all of those qualifications are open to doubt. But what’s really behind the Deep State outrage at Trump is captured by this blog comment: “This charade is being conducted for many reasons. One reason seems to be that we cannot allow the deplorables to elect a POTUS.” . 1 1
BillsFanNC Posted December 5, 2019 Posted December 5, 2019 1 hour ago, Deranged Rhino said: Hear that? That's the sound of an impending mental breakdown of one(several) posters. I hear shifting the drafting of articles of impeachment to light speed. 3
Deranged Rhino Posted December 5, 2019 Posted December 5, 2019 That's two referrals confirmed. More to come. 3 1
Deranged Rhino Posted December 5, 2019 Posted December 5, 2019 I missed the clip... looking for it. But if he said that... 3
Foxx Posted December 5, 2019 Posted December 5, 2019 22 minutes ago, Deranged Rhino said: I missed the clip... looking for it. But if he said that... https://twitter.com/DavidLeeMAGA/status/1202664539600424961 2 2
Buffalo_Gal Posted December 5, 2019 Posted December 5, 2019 22 minutes ago, Deranged Rhino said: I missed the clip... looking for it. But if he said that... Didyafindit? Didyafindit? If Clapper said that... wow weeeee. That's gonna deflate more than a few balloons. 1 minute ago, Foxx said: https://twitter.com/DavidLeeMAGA/status/1202664539600424961 Awwww that was not quite what I expected. 1
Foxx Posted December 5, 2019 Posted December 5, 2019 (edited) 9 minutes ago, Buffalo_Gal said: ... Awwww that was not quite what I expected. 'headlines' come from both sides in this warfare. Edited December 5, 2019 by Foxx 2
Foxx Posted December 5, 2019 Posted December 5, 2019 well, at least this news is only, 'DEVELOPING'... https://twitter.com/paulsperry_/status/1202690714494259215 3
Recommended Posts